Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Patients with Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors at a High-Volume Sarcoma Center.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16123-w
Heather G Lyu, Russell G Witt, Nikita Rajkot, Emily Z Keung, Keila E Torres, Kelly K Hunt, Neeta Somaiah, Alexander J Lazar, Christina L Roland, Christopher P Scally
{"title":"Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Patients with Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors at a High-Volume Sarcoma Center.","authors":"Heather G Lyu, Russell G Witt, Nikita Rajkot, Emily Z Keung, Keila E Torres, Kelly K Hunt, Neeta Somaiah, Alexander J Lazar, Christina L Roland, Christopher P Scally","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16123-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The course of subclinical gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is variable. The management of small GISTs is not well-defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of patients presenting with small GISTs with documented follow-up appointment at our institution between 2016 and 2022 were identified and reviewed. Comparative univariate analysis to compare patient and tumor characteristics and outcomes was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six patients were followed for a median of 3.7 years (range 0.1-20 years). The median size at presentation was 1.7 (range 0.1-2.5) cm. A total of 51.2% (n = 44) underwent surgery before or immediately after initial presentation for pain (18.2%), bleeding (15.9%), or patient preference (6.8%). Another 17.4% (n = 15) had delayed surgery for tumor growth (40%), patient preference (2.7%), bleeding (6.7%), or pain (6.7%). The remaining 31.4% (n = 27) of patients never underwent surgery for reasons that included no growth/stability (44.4%), concomitant cancer diagnosis/treatment (29.6%), comorbidities (14.8%), and patient preference (3.7%). Patients who underwent surveillance without intervention compared with those who had delayed surgery were older (71.1 vs. 60.8 years, p < 0.001) with multiple comorbidities or a concurrent cancer diagnosis (70.3% vs. 20%, p = 0.005). There were no differences in survival or rate of distant metastases. Average time to surgery in the delayed group was 2 (range 0.1-10.3) years, and 86% of these patients underwent surgery by 5.5 years after diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older patients with comorbidities or concurrent cancer diagnoses, opting out of surgery does not affect survival. Conversely, younger patients, free from significant comorbidities or other diagnoses, may consider surgery or active surveillance for up to 5 years, with comparable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"9258-9264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16123-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The course of subclinical gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is variable. The management of small GISTs is not well-defined.

Methods: Records of patients presenting with small GISTs with documented follow-up appointment at our institution between 2016 and 2022 were identified and reviewed. Comparative univariate analysis to compare patient and tumor characteristics and outcomes was performed.

Results: Eighty-six patients were followed for a median of 3.7 years (range 0.1-20 years). The median size at presentation was 1.7 (range 0.1-2.5) cm. A total of 51.2% (n = 44) underwent surgery before or immediately after initial presentation for pain (18.2%), bleeding (15.9%), or patient preference (6.8%). Another 17.4% (n = 15) had delayed surgery for tumor growth (40%), patient preference (2.7%), bleeding (6.7%), or pain (6.7%). The remaining 31.4% (n = 27) of patients never underwent surgery for reasons that included no growth/stability (44.4%), concomitant cancer diagnosis/treatment (29.6%), comorbidities (14.8%), and patient preference (3.7%). Patients who underwent surveillance without intervention compared with those who had delayed surgery were older (71.1 vs. 60.8 years, p < 0.001) with multiple comorbidities or a concurrent cancer diagnosis (70.3% vs. 20%, p = 0.005). There were no differences in survival or rate of distant metastases. Average time to surgery in the delayed group was 2 (range 0.1-10.3) years, and 86% of these patients underwent surgery by 5.5 years after diagnosis.

Conclusions: In older patients with comorbidities or concurrent cancer diagnoses, opting out of surgery does not affect survival. Conversely, younger patients, free from significant comorbidities or other diagnoses, may consider surgery or active surveillance for up to 5 years, with comparable outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高容量肉瘤中心对小胃肠道间质瘤患者的治疗模式和结果。
背景:亚临床胃肠道间质瘤(GISTs)的病程多变。小型胃肠道间质瘤的治疗方法尚不明确:方法:对2016年至2022年期间在我院就诊并有随访记录的小型GIST患者的病历进行鉴定和审查。对患者和肿瘤特征及预后进行了单变量比较分析:86名患者的随访时间中位数为3.7年(0.1-20年不等)。发病时肿瘤大小的中位数为 1.7 厘米(0.1-2.5 厘米)。共有 51.2% 的患者(44 人)在初次就诊前或就诊后因疼痛(18.2%)、出血(15.9%)或患者偏好(6.8%)立即接受了手术治疗。另有 17.4%(n = 15)的患者因肿瘤生长(40%)、患者偏好(2.7%)、出血(6.7%)或疼痛(6.7%)而延迟手术。其余 31.4% 的患者(n = 27)从未接受过手术,原因包括肿瘤没有生长/稳定(44.4%)、合并癌症诊断/治疗(29.6%)、合并症(14.8%)和患者偏好(3.7%)。与推迟手术的患者相比,接受监测而不进行干预的患者年龄更大(71.1 岁对 60.8 岁,P < 0.001),有多种并发症或并发癌症诊断(70.3% 对 20%,P = 0.005)。生存率和远处转移率没有差异。延迟组患者的平均手术时间为2年(0.1-10.3年不等),其中86%的患者在确诊后5.5年接受了手术:结论:对于有合并症或并发癌症的老年患者来说,选择放弃手术不会影响生存。相反,对于无严重并发症或其他诊断的年轻患者,可考虑手术或进行长达 5 年的积极监测,结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
期刊最新文献
Correction: The Top Ten Annals of Surgical Oncology Original Articles on Twitter/X: 2020-2023. Correction: ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Surgery, Three-Dimensional (3D) Reconstruction and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence: The Perfect Combo to Enter the Era of Intraoperative Liver Navigation. Correction: Patient-Reported Outcomes 10 Years After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. ASO Visual Abstract: Evaluating the Efficacy of Different Treatment Intensities in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Nationwide Cancer Registry-Based Study. ASO Visual Abstract: Cost-Analysis of Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Malignancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1