Use of ECT in patients with organic catatonia

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Asian journal of psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104206
Sandeeep Grover, Kanika Sethi, Subho Chakrabarti
{"title":"Use of ECT in patients with organic catatonia","authors":"Sandeeep Grover,&nbsp;Kanika Sethi,&nbsp;Subho Chakrabarti","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is considered to be a treatment of choice in patients with catatonia, who do not respond to lorazepam, irrespective of the underlying aetiology. Although, significant data is available for successful use of ECT in patients with catatonia secondary to affective and psychotic disorders, little information is available for use of ECT in organic catatonia.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess demographic and clinical profile of patients with organic catatonia receiving ECT.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Using a retrospective study design, ECT register of the department was reviewed for the period of 2019–2023 to identify the patients with organic catatonia, who received ECT. The treatment records of these patients were reviewed to extract the demographic and clinical profile.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, out of the 926 patients who received ECT, 12 (1.3 %) patients diagnosed with organic catatonia received ECT. The mean age of study sample was 41.67 (SD- 20.68) years and mean number of ECTs given in a course of ECT were 8 (SD- 4.3). In majority of the patients, ECT was considered after the failure of lorazepam challenge test. Majority (75 %) of the patients showed good response to ECT and only 16.67 % of the patients experienced complications during the course of ECT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ECT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for organic catatonia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 104206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201824002995","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is considered to be a treatment of choice in patients with catatonia, who do not respond to lorazepam, irrespective of the underlying aetiology. Although, significant data is available for successful use of ECT in patients with catatonia secondary to affective and psychotic disorders, little information is available for use of ECT in organic catatonia.

Aim

To assess demographic and clinical profile of patients with organic catatonia receiving ECT.

Methodology

Using a retrospective study design, ECT register of the department was reviewed for the period of 2019–2023 to identify the patients with organic catatonia, who received ECT. The treatment records of these patients were reviewed to extract the demographic and clinical profile.

Results

During the study period, out of the 926 patients who received ECT, 12 (1.3 %) patients diagnosed with organic catatonia received ECT. The mean age of study sample was 41.67 (SD- 20.68) years and mean number of ECTs given in a course of ECT were 8 (SD- 4.3). In majority of the patients, ECT was considered after the failure of lorazepam challenge test. Majority (75 %) of the patients showed good response to ECT and only 16.67 % of the patients experienced complications during the course of ECT.

Conclusion

ECT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for organic catatonia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对器质性紧张症患者使用电痉挛疗法。
背景:电休克疗法(ECT)被认为是对劳拉西泮无效的紧张性精神障碍患者的首选治疗方法,无论其潜在病因如何。尽管有大量数据表明,对继发于情感障碍和精神障碍的紧张症患者成功使用了电痉挛疗法,但对器质性紧张症患者使用电痉挛疗法的资料却很少:采用回顾性研究设计,对该部门 2019-2023 年期间的电痉挛疗法登记册进行审查,以确定接受电痉挛疗法的器质性紧张症患者。对这些患者的治疗记录进行审查,以提取人口统计学和临床概况:研究期间,在接受电痉挛疗法的 926 名患者中,有 12 名(1.3%)被诊断为器质性紧张症的患者接受了电痉挛疗法。研究样本的平均年龄为 41.67 岁(SD- 20.68),一个疗程中接受电痉挛疗法的平均次数为 8 次(SD- 4.3)。大多数患者都是在劳拉西泮挑战试验失败后才考虑接受电痉挛疗法。大多数患者(75%)对电痉挛疗法反应良好,只有16.67%的患者在电痉挛疗法过程中出现了并发症:结论:电痉挛疗法是治疗器质性紧张症的一种有效且耐受性良好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with catatonia associated with another mental disorder: A systematic review. Enduring conflict: The effects of war trauma on the well-being of Palestinian children. Modulating neuroplasticity through synergistic ketamine and accelerated sequential theta burst stimulation (TBS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) – A case report Altered resting-state brain activity of the superior parietal cortex and striatum in major depressive disorder and schizophrenia Reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS-TR)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1