Factors affecting the survival of prediabetic patients: comparison of Cox proportional hazards model and random survival forest method.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02648-3
Mehdi Sharafi, Mohammad Ali Mohsenpour, Sima Afrashteh, Mohammad Hassan Eftekhari, Azizallah Dehghan, Akram Farhadi, Aboubakr Jafarnezhad, Abdoljabbar Zakeri, Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha
{"title":"Factors affecting the survival of prediabetic patients: comparison of Cox proportional hazards model and random survival forest method.","authors":"Mehdi Sharafi, Mohammad Ali Mohsenpour, Sima Afrashteh, Mohammad Hassan Eftekhari, Azizallah Dehghan, Akram Farhadi, Aboubakr Jafarnezhad, Abdoljabbar Zakeri, Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02648-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults is experiencing a rapid increase. This study aimed to identify the factors affecting the survival of prediabetic patients using a comparison of the Cox proportional hazards model (CPH) and the Random survival forest (RSF).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective cohort study was performed on 746 prediabetics in southwest Iran. The demographic, lifestyle, and clinical data of the participants were recorded. The CPH and RSF models were used to determine the patients' survival. Furthermore, the concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were employed to compare the performance of the Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model and the random survival forest (RSF) model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year cumulative T2DM incidence was 12.73%. Based on the results of the CPH model, NAFLD (HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.85), FBS (HR = 1.008, 95% CI: 1.005, 1.012) and increased abdominal fat (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.04) were directly associated with diabetes occurrence in prediabetic patients. The RSF model suggests that factors including FBS, waist circumference, depression, NAFLD, afternoon sleep, and female gender are the most important variables that predict diabetes. The C-index indicated that the RSF model has a higher percentage of agreement than the CPH model, and in the weighted Brier Score index, the RSF model had less error than the Kaplan-Meier and CPH model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show that the incidence of diabetes was alarmingly high in Iran. The results suggested that several demographic and clinical factors are associated with diabetes occurrence in prediabetic patients. The high-risk population needs special measures for screening and care programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"24 1","pages":"246"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02648-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults is experiencing a rapid increase. This study aimed to identify the factors affecting the survival of prediabetic patients using a comparison of the Cox proportional hazards model (CPH) and the Random survival forest (RSF).

Method: This prospective cohort study was performed on 746 prediabetics in southwest Iran. The demographic, lifestyle, and clinical data of the participants were recorded. The CPH and RSF models were used to determine the patients' survival. Furthermore, the concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were employed to compare the performance of the Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model and the random survival forest (RSF) model.

Results: The 5-year cumulative T2DM incidence was 12.73%. Based on the results of the CPH model, NAFLD (HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.85), FBS (HR = 1.008, 95% CI: 1.005, 1.012) and increased abdominal fat (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.04) were directly associated with diabetes occurrence in prediabetic patients. The RSF model suggests that factors including FBS, waist circumference, depression, NAFLD, afternoon sleep, and female gender are the most important variables that predict diabetes. The C-index indicated that the RSF model has a higher percentage of agreement than the CPH model, and in the weighted Brier Score index, the RSF model had less error than the Kaplan-Meier and CPH model.

Conclusion: Our findings show that the incidence of diabetes was alarmingly high in Iran. The results suggested that several demographic and clinical factors are associated with diabetes occurrence in prediabetic patients. The high-risk population needs special measures for screening and care programs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响糖尿病前期患者生存的因素:Cox 比例危险模型与随机生存森林法的比较。
背景:全球成人 2 型糖尿病的发病率正在迅速上升。本研究旨在通过比较考克斯比例危险模型(CPH)和随机生存森林(RSF),确定影响糖尿病前期患者生存的因素:这项前瞻性队列研究的对象是伊朗西南部的 746 名糖尿病前期患者。研究记录了参与者的人口统计学、生活方式和临床数据。CPH 和 RSF 模型用于确定患者的存活率。此外,还采用了一致性指数(C-index)和时间依赖性接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)来比较考克斯比例危险(CPH)模型和随机生存森林(RSF)模型的性能:结果:5 年 T2DM 累计发病率为 12.73%。根据 CPH 模型的结果,非酒精性脂肪肝(HR = 1.74,95% CI:1.06, 2.85)、FBS(HR = 1.008,95% CI:1.005, 1.012)和腹部脂肪增加(HR = 1.02,95% CI:1.01, 1.04)与糖尿病前期患者的糖尿病发生直接相关。RSF 模型表明,包括 FBS、腰围、抑郁、非酒精性脂肪肝、下午睡眠和女性性别在内的因素是预测糖尿病的最重要变量。C指数表明,RSF模型的一致率高于CPH模型,在加权布赖尔评分指数中,RSF模型的误差小于Kaplan-Meier模型和CPH模型:我们的研究结果表明,伊朗的糖尿病发病率高得惊人。结果表明,一些人口和临床因素与糖尿病前期患者的糖尿病发生率有关。高危人群需要采取特别措施进行筛查和护理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
期刊最新文献
GBC-AST: a cluster-based oversampling method for heart failure prediction in imbalanced medical data sets. Performance fairness of neural network models in early risk assessment of inpatients with varying severity: a retrospective study. Healthcare professionals' perspectives on decision-making about lung cancer screening participation: a cross-sectional study in Flanders. Development of a machine-learning based diagnosis procedure to distinguish aortic dissection from non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Estimation of future occurrence of hemoglobin-A1c elevation with and without differential privacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1