Efficacy and Safety of Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in Chinese Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension: The Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multi-Center Iberis-HTN Trial.

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy & Fuels Pub Date : 2024-11-12 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069215
Xiongjing Jiang, Felix Mahfoud, Wei Li, Hui Dong, Jing Yu, Shuhua Yu, Xiaoping Chen, Peijian Wang, Zhiqiang Li, Lucas Lauder, Zhifang Wang, Zheng Ji, Yifei Dong, Bing Han, Zhiming Zhu, Yulin Chen, Jianzhong Xu, Xingsheng Zhao, Weidong Fan, Wen Xie, Brad Hubbard, Xi Hu, Kazuomi Kario, Runlin Gao
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in Chinese Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension: The Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multi-Center Iberis-HTN Trial.","authors":"Xiongjing Jiang, Felix Mahfoud, Wei Li, Hui Dong, Jing Yu, Shuhua Yu, Xiaoping Chen, Peijian Wang, Zhiqiang Li, Lucas Lauder, Zhifang Wang, Zheng Ji, Yifei Dong, Bing Han, Zhiming Zhu, Yulin Chen, Jianzhong Xu, Xingsheng Zhao, Weidong Fan, Wen Xie, Brad Hubbard, Xi Hu, Kazuomi Kario, Runlin Gao","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal denervation (RDN) can lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension in both the presence and absence of medication. This is a sham-controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of RDN in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter, randomized, patient- and outcome-assessor-blinded, sham-controlled trial investigated radiofrequency RDN in patients with hypertension on standardized triple antihypertensive therapy. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo RDN using a multi-electrode radiofrequency catheter (Iberis; Shanghai Angiocare Medical Technology, Shanghai, China) or a sham procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was the between-group difference in baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from randomization to 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 217 randomized patients (mean age, 45.3±10.2 years; 21% female), 107 were randomized to RDN and 110 were randomized to sham control. At 6 months, there was a greater reduction in 24-hour systolic BP in the RDN (-13.0±12.1 mm Hg) compared with the sham control group (-3.0±13.0 mm Hg; baseline-adjusted between-group difference, -9.4 mm Hg [95% CI, -12.8 to -5.9]; <i>P</i><0.001). Compared with sham, 24-hour diastolic BP was lowered by -5.0 mm Hg ([95% CI, -7.5 to -2.4]; <i>P</i><0.001) 6 months after RDN, and office systolic and diastolic BP was lowered by -6.4 mm Hg ([95% CI, -10.5 to -2.3]; <i>P</i>=0.003) and -5.1 mm Hg ([95% CI, -8.2 to -2.0]; <i>P</i>=0.001), respectively. One patient in the RDN group experienced an access site complication (hematoma), which resolved without sequelae. No other major device- or procedure-related safety events occurred through follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this trial of Chinese patients with uncontrolled hypertension on a standardized triple pharmacotherapy, RDN was safe and reduced ambulatory and office BP at 6 months compared with sham.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02901704.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Renal denervation (RDN) can lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension in both the presence and absence of medication. This is a sham-controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of RDN in China.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, patient- and outcome-assessor-blinded, sham-controlled trial investigated radiofrequency RDN in patients with hypertension on standardized triple antihypertensive therapy. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo RDN using a multi-electrode radiofrequency catheter (Iberis; Shanghai Angiocare Medical Technology, Shanghai, China) or a sham procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was the between-group difference in baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from randomization to 6 months.

Results: Of 217 randomized patients (mean age, 45.3±10.2 years; 21% female), 107 were randomized to RDN and 110 were randomized to sham control. At 6 months, there was a greater reduction in 24-hour systolic BP in the RDN (-13.0±12.1 mm Hg) compared with the sham control group (-3.0±13.0 mm Hg; baseline-adjusted between-group difference, -9.4 mm Hg [95% CI, -12.8 to -5.9]; P<0.001). Compared with sham, 24-hour diastolic BP was lowered by -5.0 mm Hg ([95% CI, -7.5 to -2.4]; P<0.001) 6 months after RDN, and office systolic and diastolic BP was lowered by -6.4 mm Hg ([95% CI, -10.5 to -2.3]; P=0.003) and -5.1 mm Hg ([95% CI, -8.2 to -2.0]; P=0.001), respectively. One patient in the RDN group experienced an access site complication (hematoma), which resolved without sequelae. No other major device- or procedure-related safety events occurred through follow-up.

Conclusions: In this trial of Chinese patients with uncontrolled hypertension on a standardized triple pharmacotherapy, RDN was safe and reduced ambulatory and office BP at 6 months compared with sham.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02901704.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导管射频肾脏去神经治疗中国未控制高血压患者的有效性和安全性:随机、假对照、多中心 Iberis-HTN 试验。
背景:肾脏去神经支配(RDN)可在高血压患者服药或不服药的情况下降低血压。这是中国首次对肾脏去神经支配疗法的安全性和有效性进行假对照试验:这项前瞻性、多中心、随机、患者和结果评估者盲法假对照试验研究了射频降压网对接受标准化三联降压治疗的高血压患者的疗效。符合条件的患者按 1:1 随机分配到使用多电极射频导管(Iberis;AngioCare,中国上海)或假手术进行 RDN 治疗。主要疗效指标是随机分组至6个月期间,经基线调整后的24小时卧床平均收缩压变化的组间差异:在217名随机患者中(平均年龄为45.3±10.2岁;21%为女性),107人随机接受了RDN治疗,110人随机接受了假对照治疗。6个月时,RDN组(-13.0±12.1 mm Hg)与假对照组(-3.0±13.0 mm Hg;基线调整后组间差异为-9.4 mm Hg [95% CI, -12.8 to -5.9];PPP=0.003)和-5.1 mm Hg([95% CI, -8.2 to -2.0];P=0.001)相比,24小时收缩压降低幅度更大。RDN 组中有一名患者发生了入路部位并发症(血肿),但并无后遗症。随访期间未发生其他与器械或手术相关的重大安全事件:在这项针对接受标准化三联药物治疗的中国未控制高血压患者的试验中,RDN 是安全的,与假药相比,RDN 可在 6 个月内降低非卧床血压和诊室血压:URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02901704。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
期刊最新文献
A Tale of Two Maladies: Interplay of Mendelian Principles. Randomized Crossover Trial of 2-Week Ketone Ester Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition Contributes to Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome. Myocardial Ischemic Syndromes: A New Nomenclature to Harmonize Evolving International Clinical Practice Guidelines. Efficacy and Safety of Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in Chinese Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension: The Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multi-Center Iberis-HTN Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1