CLINICAL AND IMAGING OUTCOMES OF XLIF SURGERY FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS.

Q4 Medicine Georgian medical news Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Tan Hoang, Hung Kieu, Vu Nguyen, Trung Tran, Tan Ngee, Ha Duong
{"title":"CLINICAL AND IMAGING OUTCOMES OF XLIF SURGERY FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS.","authors":"Tan Hoang, Hung Kieu, Vu Nguyen, Trung Tran, Tan Ngee, Ha Duong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the treatment outcomes of lateral interbody bone graft surgery and posterior percutaneous screws for lumbar spinal stenosis Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. There were 27 patients with 30 segments of surgery diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis that were surgically treated with the XLIF method. Clinical outcomes measured included VAS scores for lower back pain and leg pain, ODI, and JOA scores. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine after surgery was used to evaluate indirect decompression. X-ray or CT scan to evaluate bone fusion after 6 months of surgery. Differences were determined by independent T-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 27 patients with 30 segments of surgery. They were 12 males and 15 females with an average age of 58.81±8.1. There was significant improvement in VAS for lower back pain from 7.11±1.31 to 3.67±1.3, VAS for leg pain from 6.81±2.19 to 1.59±1.89, ODI from 26.41±8.95 to 13.69±8.34, and JOA score from 7.63±2.87 to 13.5±1.73. A-P diameter increased 134%, lateral diameter increased 120%, lateral recess depth increased 166%, disc height increased 126%, foraminal height increased 124%, spinal canal area increased 30%. The p-values were all <0.001. The average hospital stay was 6.79±3.01 days. Complications included 1 pedicle screw malformation, 1 ALL avulsion fracture, 1 abdominal herniation, 1 venous damage, 1 failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>XLIF surgery presents a favorable option for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. This is a minimally invasive surgical method that reduces pain, reduces bleeding, and is effective in indirectly decompressing the spinal canal both clinal and imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":12610,"journal":{"name":"Georgian medical news","volume":" 351","pages":"6-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgian medical news","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of lateral interbody bone graft surgery and posterior percutaneous screws for lumbar spinal stenosis Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. There were 27 patients with 30 segments of surgery diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis that were surgically treated with the XLIF method. Clinical outcomes measured included VAS scores for lower back pain and leg pain, ODI, and JOA scores. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine after surgery was used to evaluate indirect decompression. X-ray or CT scan to evaluate bone fusion after 6 months of surgery. Differences were determined by independent T-test.

Results: There were 27 patients with 30 segments of surgery. They were 12 males and 15 females with an average age of 58.81±8.1. There was significant improvement in VAS for lower back pain from 7.11±1.31 to 3.67±1.3, VAS for leg pain from 6.81±2.19 to 1.59±1.89, ODI from 26.41±8.95 to 13.69±8.34, and JOA score from 7.63±2.87 to 13.5±1.73. A-P diameter increased 134%, lateral diameter increased 120%, lateral recess depth increased 166%, disc height increased 126%, foraminal height increased 124%, spinal canal area increased 30%. The p-values were all <0.001. The average hospital stay was 6.79±3.01 days. Complications included 1 pedicle screw malformation, 1 ALL avulsion fracture, 1 abdominal herniation, 1 venous damage, 1 failure.

Conclusion: XLIF surgery presents a favorable option for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. This is a minimally invasive surgical method that reduces pain, reduces bleeding, and is effective in indirectly decompressing the spinal canal both clinal and imaging.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
XLIF手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床和成像结果。
背景:评估腰椎管狭窄症的侧方椎间植骨手术和后路经皮螺钉治疗效果评估腰椎管狭窄症侧椎体间植骨手术和后路经皮螺钉的治疗效果 方法:这是一项横断面描述性研究:这是一项横断面描述性研究。共有 27 名患者的 30 个手术节段被诊断为腰椎管狭窄症,并接受了 XLIF 方法的手术治疗。测量的临床结果包括腰痛和腿痛的 VAS 评分、ODI 和 JOA 评分。术后腰椎的磁共振成像用于评估间接减压。手术 6 个月后,采用 X 光或 CT 扫描评估骨融合情况。差异采用独立 T 检验:共有 27 名患者接受了 30 节段的手术。结果:共有 27 名患者接受了 30 节手术,其中男性 12 人,女性 15 人,平均年龄(58.81±8.1)岁。下背痛 VAS 从 7.11±1.31 显著改善至 3.67±1.3,腿痛 VAS 从 6.81±2.19显著改善至 1.59±1.89,ODI 从 26.41±8.95显著改善至 13.69±8.34,JOA 评分从 7.63±2.87显著改善至 13.5±1.73。A-P径增加了134%,侧径增加了120%,侧凹深度增加了166%,椎间盘高度增加了126%,椎孔高度增加了124%,椎管面积增加了30%。P值均为结论:XLIF 手术为腰椎管狭窄症患者提供了一个有利的选择。这是一种微创手术方法,可减轻疼痛、减少出血,并能有效地对椎管进行间接减压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Georgian medical news
Georgian medical news Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
207
期刊最新文献
ALOPECIA AREATA PROFILING SHOWS LNCRNAS REGULATE THE SUPPRESSED EXPRESSION OF KERATIN. ANALYSIS OF BLOOD PARAMETERS IN TYUMEN RESIDENTS WITH COVID-19 IN CATAMNESIS AND/OR VACCINATED AGAINST A NEW CORONAVIRUS INFECTION. ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES IN HEART RATE VARIABILITY INDICES OF STUDENTS AFTER COVID-19 LOCKDOWN: A COHORT STUDY. CHRONIC HEART FAILURE WITH PRESERVED LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION (HFPEF) AND RIGHT VENTRICLE INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL SINUS RHYTHM AND ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; A SMALL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY: RELEVANCE OF THE PROBLEM, DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH, ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF RIGHT VENTRICLE. CLINICAL MANIFESTATION AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF LEPTOSPIROSIS AT THE MODERN STAGE IN GEORGIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1