COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS INDUCED BY STANDARD AND MODIFIED LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY PERFORMANCE ON SHORT TERM AND DISTAL COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH 3RD DEGREE OF MORBID OBESITY.

Q4 Medicine Georgian medical news Pub Date : 2024-06-01
S Shahbazyan
{"title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS INDUCED BY STANDARD AND MODIFIED LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY PERFORMANCE ON SHORT TERM AND DISTAL COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH 3RD DEGREE OF MORBID OBESITY.","authors":"S Shahbazyan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effective techniques of surgical intervention that ensure the desired level of weight reduction outcomes (decreased level of obesity) not always improve QOL outcomes, explained by a range of post-surgery complications. There are the specific complications, strongly impacting the QOL of the patients after bariatric surgery and increasing postoperative comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this retrospective case control study was to evaluate the relative safety of primary LSG performed with standard and modified LSG techniques according to the Clavien-Dindo complication grading system and the rate of long-term complications in patients with BMI>40.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 497 cases of patients were divided into 2 groups in accordance with the type of LSG performed. The first group (n = 246) were the patients managed with the Standard protocol of LSG and the second group (n = 251) included the patients treated with the modified protocol of the LSG. The prevalence of specific post-bariatric complications and short-term (30-days) complications was calculated and compared in the groups. The long-term complications were assessed after 1-year օf post-operation period in both intervention groups. The relative risk ratio, p-value and CI95% were calculated for all complications. The short-term (30-days) complications assessment in both intervention groups was performed in accordance with Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The remarkable reduction of relative risks was registered for the minor and major complications rates. Similarly, the total rates for the minor and major complications demonstrated strong difference between group I and group II (p<0,05). Тhe intraoperative and early (first 72 hours) complications (acute bleeding, and leakage) rates in patients of group I were reliably lower compared to the patients of group II (p<0,05). The RR indicators were 0.123 and 0.121 respectively for acute bleeding and leakage. The indicator of acute obstruction was not essentially different while intergroup comparison was significantly divergent (p<.05). However, the RRR was calculated as 80%. The total rate of intraoperative and first 72 hours complications was 7.3% vs 1.2% in group II. The difference was reliable (p-value<.05) in Gall stone disease, GERD, thrombosis malnutrition and anemia. Comparison of the Renal lithiasis and depression didn't reveal any essential difference between clinical groups (p-value>.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results we received are direct confirmation of the comparatively higher effectiveness of the modified LSG evidenced by a significant reduction of the major and minor complications in patients with BMI>40.</p>","PeriodicalId":12610,"journal":{"name":"Georgian medical news","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgian medical news","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The effective techniques of surgical intervention that ensure the desired level of weight reduction outcomes (decreased level of obesity) not always improve QOL outcomes, explained by a range of post-surgery complications. There are the specific complications, strongly impacting the QOL of the patients after bariatric surgery and increasing postoperative comorbidity.

Aim: The aim of this retrospective case control study was to evaluate the relative safety of primary LSG performed with standard and modified LSG techniques according to the Clavien-Dindo complication grading system and the rate of long-term complications in patients with BMI>40.

Materials and methods: A total of 497 cases of patients were divided into 2 groups in accordance with the type of LSG performed. The first group (n = 246) were the patients managed with the Standard protocol of LSG and the second group (n = 251) included the patients treated with the modified protocol of the LSG. The prevalence of specific post-bariatric complications and short-term (30-days) complications was calculated and compared in the groups. The long-term complications were assessed after 1-year օf post-operation period in both intervention groups. The relative risk ratio, p-value and CI95% were calculated for all complications. The short-term (30-days) complications assessment in both intervention groups was performed in accordance with Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications.

Results: The remarkable reduction of relative risks was registered for the minor and major complications rates. Similarly, the total rates for the minor and major complications demonstrated strong difference between group I and group II (p<0,05). Тhe intraoperative and early (first 72 hours) complications (acute bleeding, and leakage) rates in patients of group I were reliably lower compared to the patients of group II (p<0,05). The RR indicators were 0.123 and 0.121 respectively for acute bleeding and leakage. The indicator of acute obstruction was not essentially different while intergroup comparison was significantly divergent (p<.05). However, the RRR was calculated as 80%. The total rate of intraoperative and first 72 hours complications was 7.3% vs 1.2% in group II. The difference was reliable (p-value<.05) in Gall stone disease, GERD, thrombosis malnutrition and anemia. Comparison of the Renal lithiasis and depression didn't reveal any essential difference between clinical groups (p-value>.05).

Conclusion: The results we received are direct confirmation of the comparatively higher effectiveness of the modified LSG evidenced by a significant reduction of the major and minor complications in patients with BMI>40.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准和改良腹腔镜袖状胃切除术对三度病态肥胖患者短期和远端并发症影响的比较分析。
导言:有效的外科干预技术可确保达到理想的减重效果(减少肥胖程度),但手术后的一系列并发症并不总能改善患者的生活质量。目的:这项回顾性病例对照研究旨在根据克拉维恩-丁多并发症分级系统,评估采用标准和改良LSG技术进行初治LSG的相对安全性,以及BMI>40患者的长期并发症发生率:根据LSG的类型将497例患者分为两组。第一组(n = 246)为采用标准腹壁成形术方案治疗的患者,第二组(n = 251)为采用改良腹壁成形术方案治疗的患者。计算并比较了两组患者在减肥后特定并发症和短期(30 天)并发症的发生率。长期并发症在两组患者术后一年后进行评估。计算了所有并发症的相对风险比、P 值和 CI95%。两组患者的短期(30 天)并发症评估均按照 Clavien-Dindo 手术并发症分类法进行:结果:轻微和严重并发症发生率的相对风险明显降低。结果:轻微和严重并发症发生率的相对风险显著降低,同样,轻微和严重并发症的总发生率在第一组和第二组之间也有明显差异(P.05):我们得到的结果直接证实了改良 LSG 的有效性相对较高,BMI>40 患者的主要和次要并发症明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Georgian medical news
Georgian medical news Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
207
期刊最新文献
UNCONTROLLED TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS MODULATED PLASMA LEVELS OF LIPID CATABOLIC PROTEINS. A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE VARIABLE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL AND NON-ALCOHOL-RELATED FATTY LIVER DISEASE ON METABOLIC AND INFLAMMATORY BIOMARKERS. ANALYSIS OF THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF USING THE CREATED COMBINED FIBRIN-BONE SCAFFOLD FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF BONE TISSUE DEFECTS OF THE JAWS. ASSESSMENT OF CIPROFLOXACIN EFFECTS ON SOME CHICKS' ORGANS: A COMPREHENSIVE BIOCHEMICAL AND HISTOLOGICAL STUDY. CHARACTERIZATION OF SERUM SERINE PROTEASE BIOCHEMICAL PROFILE IN PATIENTS WITH RENAL FAILURE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1