Introducing simulation-based education to Genitourinary Medicine specialty training in the North West of England: A quality improvement project exploring trainee perspectives and impact.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY International Journal of STD & AIDS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1177/09564624241280329
Izuchukwu Williams Ezeh
{"title":"Introducing simulation-based education to Genitourinary Medicine specialty training in the North West of England: A quality improvement project exploring trainee perspectives and impact.","authors":"Izuchukwu Williams Ezeh","doi":"10.1177/09564624241280329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation-based education (SBE) provides enactive experiences for learners. This project explores the utility of SBE in GUM training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase 1 was a qualitative survey of GUM trainees across the UK exploring their views on SBE. Phase 2 involved roll-out of SBE to new GUM trainees. Feedback was subsequently obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three participants were surveyed in phase 1. When asked to rate the relevance of SBE to curriculum competencies on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = not relevant, 5 = highly relevant), the highest ratings (score ≥4) were for proctoscopy (4.1), IUD insertion (4.1), SDI removal (4.1), SDI insertion (4.0), and punch biopsy (4.0). All curriculum items scored ≥3. Eighty-three percent (<i>n</i> = 19) felt SBE will improve clinician confidence and competence. Following introduction of SBE, participants fed back on the relevance of the session. All 5 respondents rated the session ≥4 for addressing their clinical and curriculum goals. All respondents rated the session ≥4 for improving clinician confidence and competence. The session received an overall rating of 5, and respondents similarly rated 5 for more sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trainees recognise the value of simulated learning experiences and its role in improving procedural competence and addressing bespoke human factor skills relevant to GUM.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624241280329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation-based education (SBE) provides enactive experiences for learners. This project explores the utility of SBE in GUM training.

Methods: Phase 1 was a qualitative survey of GUM trainees across the UK exploring their views on SBE. Phase 2 involved roll-out of SBE to new GUM trainees. Feedback was subsequently obtained.

Results: Twenty-three participants were surveyed in phase 1. When asked to rate the relevance of SBE to curriculum competencies on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = not relevant, 5 = highly relevant), the highest ratings (score ≥4) were for proctoscopy (4.1), IUD insertion (4.1), SDI removal (4.1), SDI insertion (4.0), and punch biopsy (4.0). All curriculum items scored ≥3. Eighty-three percent (n = 19) felt SBE will improve clinician confidence and competence. Following introduction of SBE, participants fed back on the relevance of the session. All 5 respondents rated the session ≥4 for addressing their clinical and curriculum goals. All respondents rated the session ≥4 for improving clinician confidence and competence. The session received an overall rating of 5, and respondents similarly rated 5 for more sessions.

Conclusion: Trainees recognise the value of simulated learning experiences and its role in improving procedural competence and addressing bespoke human factor skills relevant to GUM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英格兰西北部的泌尿生殖医学专业培训中引入模拟教学:探索学员观点和影响的质量改进项目。
介绍:模拟教育(SBE)为学习者提供了积极主动的体验。本项目探讨了 SBE 在 GUM 培训中的实用性:第一阶段是对英国各地的 GUM 培训学员进行定性调查,以了解他们对 SBE 的看法。第二阶段是向新的 GUM 学员推广 SBE。随后获得反馈意见:第 1 阶段对 23 名学员进行了调查。当被要求以 1 到 5 分(1 = 不相关,5 = 高度相关)对 SBE 与课程能力的相关性进行评分时,评分最高(得分≥4)的项目是直肠镜检查(4.1)、宫内节育器插入(4.1)、SDI 取出(4.1)、SDI 插入(4.0)和穿刺活检(4.0)。所有课程项目得分均≥3。83%的学员(n = 19)认为《职业教育准则》将提高临床医师的信心和能力。在介绍了《职业教育》之后,学员们反馈了课程的相关性。所有 5 位受访者都将该课程与临床和课程目标的相关性评为≥4 分。在提高临床医生的信心和能力方面,所有受访者的评分均≥4 分。该课程的总体评分为 5 分,受访者对更多课程的评分同样为 5 分:受训人员认识到模拟学习体验的价值及其在提高程序能力和解决与 GUM 相关的特定人为因素技能方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection in severely immunocompromised people living with HIV: Findings from a five-year cohort. Association among therapeutic adherence, health literacy, and engagement in care: How to increase health-conscious management of HIV disease. HIV risk perception and PrEP uptake among black MSM in Mississippi. Improving sustainability in sexual health: A pilot project reintroducing reusable stainless steel vaginal specula at a sexual health clinic. Therapeutic drug monitoring of tenofovir disoproxil and emtricitabine in oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users who have undergone gastrointestinal surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1