Racial Differences in Nicotine Reduction: Pooled Results from Two Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s40615-024-02155-1
Wenxue Lin, Nicolle M Krebs, Junjia Zhu, Kimberly Horn, Jonathan Foulds, A Eden Evins, Joshua E Muscat
{"title":"Racial Differences in Nicotine Reduction: Pooled Results from Two Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Wenxue Lin, Nicolle M Krebs, Junjia Zhu, Kimberly Horn, Jonathan Foulds, A Eden Evins, Joshua E Muscat","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02155-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco regulatory policies are generally intended to apply to all segments of the population and to be equitable. Results from clinical trials on switching from commercial cigarettes to reduced nicotine cigarettes have included black populations but race-specific findings are not widely reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were pooled from two parallel randomized controlled trials of gradually reduced nicotine in cigarettes from 11.6 mg per cigarette down to 0.2 mg nicotine (very low nicotine content; VLNC) vs. usual nicotine content (UNC) cigarettes (11.6 mg) over an 18-week period in smokers with low socioeconomic status (SES) and mental health conditions, respectively. We used linear regression to determine the potential effects of cigarettes and biomarker reductions (blood cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide) when using VLNC study cigarettes. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included all randomized participants regardless of adherence to the protocol. A secondary compliance analysis compared control subjects (11.6 mg cigarettes) only to those switched to low nicotine cigarettes who were biochemically determined to be compliant to exclusively using VLNC cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both Black and White VLNC smokers had significantly lower plasma cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide compared to those randomized to UNC cigarettes. The treatment × race interaction term was not significant for the outcome measures in both the ITT and secondary compliance analyses, except for cotinine in the ITT analysis (Whites: - 190 ng/mL vs. Blacks: - 118 ng/mL; p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A reduced nicotine regulation for cigarettes would result in substantial reduction in exposure to nicotine and toxicants in Black and White smokers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02155-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco regulatory policies are generally intended to apply to all segments of the population and to be equitable. Results from clinical trials on switching from commercial cigarettes to reduced nicotine cigarettes have included black populations but race-specific findings are not widely reported.

Methods: Data were pooled from two parallel randomized controlled trials of gradually reduced nicotine in cigarettes from 11.6 mg per cigarette down to 0.2 mg nicotine (very low nicotine content; VLNC) vs. usual nicotine content (UNC) cigarettes (11.6 mg) over an 18-week period in smokers with low socioeconomic status (SES) and mental health conditions, respectively. We used linear regression to determine the potential effects of cigarettes and biomarker reductions (blood cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide) when using VLNC study cigarettes. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included all randomized participants regardless of adherence to the protocol. A secondary compliance analysis compared control subjects (11.6 mg cigarettes) only to those switched to low nicotine cigarettes who were biochemically determined to be compliant to exclusively using VLNC cigarettes.

Results: Both Black and White VLNC smokers had significantly lower plasma cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide compared to those randomized to UNC cigarettes. The treatment × race interaction term was not significant for the outcome measures in both the ITT and secondary compliance analyses, except for cotinine in the ITT analysis (Whites: - 190 ng/mL vs. Blacks: - 118 ng/mL; p = 0.05).

Conclusions: A reduced nicotine regulation for cigarettes would result in substantial reduction in exposure to nicotine and toxicants in Black and White smokers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少尼古丁的种族差异:两项双盲随机对照试验的汇总结果。
导言:烟草监管政策一般旨在适用于所有人群并做到公平。从商业卷烟转向尼古丁含量降低的卷烟的临床试验结果中包括了黑人群体,但针对特定种族的研究结果并未得到广泛报道:我们对两项平行随机对照试验的数据进行了汇总,这两项试验分别针对社会经济地位(SES)较低和精神健康状况较差的吸烟者,在为期18周的时间内将香烟中的尼古丁含量从每支11.6毫克逐渐降低到0.2毫克尼古丁(尼古丁含量极低;VLNC)与尼古丁含量一般(UNC)香烟(11.6毫克)进行了对比。我们使用线性回归法确定了使用 VLNC 研究香烟时香烟和生物标志物(血液中的可替宁和呼出的一氧化碳)减少的潜在影响。意向治疗(ITT)分析包括所有随机参与者,无论其是否遵守方案。一项次要的依从性分析将对照组(11.6 毫克卷烟)与那些改用低尼古丁卷烟的人进行了比较,后者经生化鉴定符合只使用 VLNC 卷烟的要求:结果:黑人和白人 VLNC 吸烟者的血浆中可替宁含量和呼出的一氧化碳含量都明显低于随机使用 UNC 香烟的吸烟者。在 ITT 分析和次要符合性分析中,治疗 × 种族交互项对结果测量均无显著影响,但 ITT 分析中的可替宁除外(白人:- 190 ng/mL vs. 黑人:- 118 ng/mL;p = 0.05):结论:降低对香烟尼古丁的规定将大幅减少黑人和白人吸烟者接触尼古丁和有毒物质的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
A Mixed Methods Analysis of Long COVID Symptoms in Black Americans: Examining Physical and Mental Health Outcomes. Racial and Ethnic Disparities and the National Burden of COVID-19 on Inpatient Hospitalizations: A Retrospective Study in the United States in the Year 2020. Unveiling Disparities: Analyzing Hispanic Inclusion in Liver Cancer Research Databases in the United States. Correction to: Multilevel Resilience and HIV Virologic Suppression Among African American/Black Adults in the Southeastern United States. The Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Diabetes in Adult African Americans and Whites: An NHANES Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1