Utilizing Relative Autonomy Index Scores to Evaluate the Impact of Age on Motivation to Exercise in Black Women.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s40615-024-02154-2
Amber Perrier, Aishwarya Kakar, Natasha R Brown, La'Marcus T Wingate
{"title":"Utilizing Relative Autonomy Index Scores to Evaluate the Impact of Age on Motivation to Exercise in Black Women.","authors":"Amber Perrier, Aishwarya Kakar, Natasha R Brown, La'Marcus T Wingate","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02154-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black women are disproportionately affected by overweight and obesity. One theory that may have utility in increasing the amount of exercise among Black women is self-determination theory, a psychology-based theory commonly used to investigate motivation in the context of exercise. The objective of this study was to determine whether motivation towards exercise behavior differs between younger and older Black women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted by administering a survey to Black women in the Midwestern United States to elicit factors which may impact their motivation to exercise. The survey consisted of questions to gather sociodemographic information as well as responses to the Behavioral Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2). Responses on the BREQ-2 were utilized to derive the Relative Autonomy Index (RAI) which is a direct measure of self-determination that provides insight into the extent of an individual's motivation to exercise. Multiple linear regression was utilized to determine if age was predictive of relative RAI scores after adjusting for marital status and receipt of a memorable message regarding health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean RAI scores among respondents at least 40 years old were significantly higher in comparison to the RAI among respondents younger than 40. When adjusting for marital status and receipt of a memorable message regarding health, women at least 40 had a mean RAI score approximately 4.2 points higher than those under age 40. Women at least 40 years of age also had significantly higher scores on the identified regulation and intrinsic regulation subscales of the BREQ-2 questionnaire when compared to women younger than 40 after adjusting for marital status and recalling a memorable message related to health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that exercise motivations differ among age groups of Black women. Additionally, these results highlight the importance of understanding exercise motivations to further improve health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02154-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black women are disproportionately affected by overweight and obesity. One theory that may have utility in increasing the amount of exercise among Black women is self-determination theory, a psychology-based theory commonly used to investigate motivation in the context of exercise. The objective of this study was to determine whether motivation towards exercise behavior differs between younger and older Black women.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by administering a survey to Black women in the Midwestern United States to elicit factors which may impact their motivation to exercise. The survey consisted of questions to gather sociodemographic information as well as responses to the Behavioral Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2). Responses on the BREQ-2 were utilized to derive the Relative Autonomy Index (RAI) which is a direct measure of self-determination that provides insight into the extent of an individual's motivation to exercise. Multiple linear regression was utilized to determine if age was predictive of relative RAI scores after adjusting for marital status and receipt of a memorable message regarding health.

Results: Mean RAI scores among respondents at least 40 years old were significantly higher in comparison to the RAI among respondents younger than 40. When adjusting for marital status and receipt of a memorable message regarding health, women at least 40 had a mean RAI score approximately 4.2 points higher than those under age 40. Women at least 40 years of age also had significantly higher scores on the identified regulation and intrinsic regulation subscales of the BREQ-2 questionnaire when compared to women younger than 40 after adjusting for marital status and recalling a memorable message related to health.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that exercise motivations differ among age groups of Black women. Additionally, these results highlight the importance of understanding exercise motivations to further improve health outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用相对自主指数得分评估年龄对黑人女性锻炼动机的影响。
背景:黑人妇女受超重和肥胖的影响尤为严重。自我决定理论是一种以心理学为基础的理论,常用于研究运动动机,它可能对增加黑人妇女的运动量有用。本研究的目的是确定年轻和年长黑人妇女的运动动机是否有所不同:方法:我们对美国中西部的黑人妇女进行了一项横断面研究调查,以了解可能影响她们锻炼动机的因素。调查包括收集社会人口信息的问题以及对运动行为规范问卷(BREQ-2)的回答。根据 BREQ-2 的回答得出相对自主指数 (RAI),该指数是对自我决定的直接测量,可深入了解个人锻炼的动机程度。在对婚姻状况和收到的有关健康的难忘信息进行调整后,利用多元线性回归来确定年龄是否能预测相对 RAI 分数:结果:40 岁以上受访者的 RAI 平均得分明显高于 40 岁以下受访者的 RAI 平均得分。在对婚姻状况和收到的有关健康的难忘信息进行调整后,40 岁以上女性的 RAI 平均得分比 40 岁以下女性高出约 4.2 分。在对婚姻状况和回想与健康有关的难忘信息进行调整后,40 岁以上女性在 BREQ-2 问卷的识别调节和内在调节分量表上的得分也明显高于 40 岁以下的女性:这些研究结果表明,不同年龄段的黑人女性的运动动机有所不同。此外,这些结果还强调了了解运动动机对进一步改善健康状况的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
A Mixed Methods Analysis of Long COVID Symptoms in Black Americans: Examining Physical and Mental Health Outcomes. Racial and Ethnic Disparities and the National Burden of COVID-19 on Inpatient Hospitalizations: A Retrospective Study in the United States in the Year 2020. Unveiling Disparities: Analyzing Hispanic Inclusion in Liver Cancer Research Databases in the United States. Correction to: Multilevel Resilience and HIV Virologic Suppression Among African American/Black Adults in the Southeastern United States. The Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Diabetes in Adult African Americans and Whites: An NHANES Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1