Active crocodiles are less sociable.

IF 5.4 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-21 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1098/rstb.2022.0528
Cameron J Baker, Barbara Class, Ross G Dwyer, Craig E Franklin, Hamish A Campbell, Terri R Irwin, Céline H Frère
{"title":"Active crocodiles are less sociable.","authors":"Cameron J Baker, Barbara Class, Ross G Dwyer, Craig E Franklin, Hamish A Campbell, Terri R Irwin, Céline H Frère","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2022.0528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How animals move and associate with conspecifics is rarely random, with a population's spatial structure forming the foundation on which the social behaviours of individuals form. Studies examining the spatial-social interface typically measure averaged behavioural differences between individuals; however, this neglects the inherent variation present within individuals and how it may impact the spatial-social interface. Here, we investigated differences in among-individual (co)variance in sociability, activity and site fidelity in a population of wild estuarine crocodiles, <i>Crocodylus porosus,</i> across a 10-year period. By monitoring 118 crocodiles using coded acoustic transmitters and an array of fixed underwater receivers, we discovered that not only did individual crocodiles repeatably differ (among-individual variation) in each behaviour measured but also in how consistently they expressed these behaviours through time (within-individual variation). As expected, crocodile activity and sociability formed a behavioural syndrome, with more active individuals being less sociable. Interestingly, we also found that individuals that were either more sociable or displayed greater site fidelity were also more specialized (lower within-individual variation) in these behaviours. Together, our results provide important empirical evidence for the interplay between spatial, temporal and social individual-level behavioural variation and how these contribute to forming behavioural niches. This article is part of the theme issue 'The spatial-social interface: a theoretical and empirical integration'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19872,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How animals move and associate with conspecifics is rarely random, with a population's spatial structure forming the foundation on which the social behaviours of individuals form. Studies examining the spatial-social interface typically measure averaged behavioural differences between individuals; however, this neglects the inherent variation present within individuals and how it may impact the spatial-social interface. Here, we investigated differences in among-individual (co)variance in sociability, activity and site fidelity in a population of wild estuarine crocodiles, Crocodylus porosus, across a 10-year period. By monitoring 118 crocodiles using coded acoustic transmitters and an array of fixed underwater receivers, we discovered that not only did individual crocodiles repeatably differ (among-individual variation) in each behaviour measured but also in how consistently they expressed these behaviours through time (within-individual variation). As expected, crocodile activity and sociability formed a behavioural syndrome, with more active individuals being less sociable. Interestingly, we also found that individuals that were either more sociable or displayed greater site fidelity were also more specialized (lower within-individual variation) in these behaviours. Together, our results provide important empirical evidence for the interplay between spatial, temporal and social individual-level behavioural variation and how these contribute to forming behavioural niches. This article is part of the theme issue 'The spatial-social interface: a theoretical and empirical integration'.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
好动的鳄鱼不太合群。
动物的移动和与同类的联系很少是随机的,种群的空间结构是个体社会行为形成的基础。对空间-社会界面的研究通常是测量个体间的平均行为差异;然而,这忽略了个体内部存在的固有差异,以及这种差异会如何影响空间-社会界面。在这里,我们研究了野生河口鳄(Crocodylus porosus)种群中个体间在社会性、活动和地点忠诚度方面的(共同)差异,时间跨度长达 10 年。通过使用编码声学发射器和固定水下接收器阵列对 118 条鳄鱼进行监测,我们发现鳄鱼个体不仅在所测量的每种行为上存在重复性差异(个体间差异),而且它们在不同时间段内表现这些行为的一致性也存在差异(个体内差异)。正如预期的那样,鳄鱼的活动性和社会性形成了一种行为综合征,活动性越强的个体社会性越差。有趣的是,我们还发现那些更善于交际或表现出更高地点忠诚度的个体在这些行为上也更专一(个体内变异较小)。总之,我们的研究结果为空间、时间和社会个体水平的行为变异之间的相互作用以及这些变异如何促成行为壁龛的形成提供了重要的经验证据。本文是主题 "空间-社会界面:理论与经验的整合 "的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes topics across the life sciences. As long as the core subject lies within the biological sciences, some issues may also include content crossing into other areas such as the physical sciences, social sciences, biophysics, policy, economics etc. Issues generally sit within four broad areas (although many issues sit across these areas): Organismal, environmental and evolutionary biology Neuroscience and cognition Cellular, molecular and developmental biology Health and disease.
期刊最新文献
Social ageing can protect against infectious disease in a group-living primate. The concept of critical age group for density dependence: bridging the gap between demographers, evolutionary biologists and behavioural ecologists. The ecology of ageing in wild societies: linking age structure and social behaviour. The life history of harvester ant colonies. Understanding age and society using natural populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1