Evidence that intergenerational income mobility is the strongest predictor of drug overdose deaths in U. S. Midwest counties

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104558
Gene M. Heyman, Ehri Ryu, Hiram Brownell
{"title":"Evidence that intergenerational income mobility is the strongest predictor of drug overdose deaths in U. S. Midwest counties","authors":"Gene M. Heyman,&nbsp;Ehri Ryu,&nbsp;Hiram Brownell","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Our goal in this report was to quantify the degree to which opioid prescription rates and socioeconomic correlates of income inequality predicted overdose deaths in the 1055 U.S. Midwest counties. The study follows up a state-level analysis which reported that opioid prescription rates, social capital and unemployment explained much of the variance in opioid overdose death rates (Heyman, McVicar, &amp; Brownell, 2019).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We created a data set that included drug overdose death rates, opioid prescription rates, and correlates of income inequality. Given that the variables of interest varied at the state and county level, multilevel regression was our statistical approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2006 to 2021, Midwest overdose drug deaths increased according to an exponential equation that closely approximated the equation that describes the increases in overdose deaths for the entire U.S. from 1978 to 2016 (e.g., Jalal et al., 2018). Retail opioid prescription sales increased from 2006 to 2012, but then declined so that by 2017 they were lower than in 2006. The regression analyses revealed that intergenerational income mobility was the strongest predictor of overdose deaths. The other consistently statistically significant predictors were opioid prescription rates, social capital, and unemployment rates. Together these predictors, plus pupil teacher ratios, single parent families, and attending college accounted for approximately 47 % of the variance in overdose death rates each year. In keeping with the decline in opioid prescription rates, the explanatory power of opioid prescription rates weakened over the course of the study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overdose deaths increased at a constant exponential rate for the years that it was possible to apply our regression model. This occurred even though access to legal opioids decreased. What remained invariant was the predictive strength of intergenerational income mobility; each year it was the predictor that explained the most variance in overdose deaths.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104558"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Our goal in this report was to quantify the degree to which opioid prescription rates and socioeconomic correlates of income inequality predicted overdose deaths in the 1055 U.S. Midwest counties. The study follows up a state-level analysis which reported that opioid prescription rates, social capital and unemployment explained much of the variance in opioid overdose death rates (Heyman, McVicar, & Brownell, 2019).

Methods

We created a data set that included drug overdose death rates, opioid prescription rates, and correlates of income inequality. Given that the variables of interest varied at the state and county level, multilevel regression was our statistical approach.

Results

From 2006 to 2021, Midwest overdose drug deaths increased according to an exponential equation that closely approximated the equation that describes the increases in overdose deaths for the entire U.S. from 1978 to 2016 (e.g., Jalal et al., 2018). Retail opioid prescription sales increased from 2006 to 2012, but then declined so that by 2017 they were lower than in 2006. The regression analyses revealed that intergenerational income mobility was the strongest predictor of overdose deaths. The other consistently statistically significant predictors were opioid prescription rates, social capital, and unemployment rates. Together these predictors, plus pupil teacher ratios, single parent families, and attending college accounted for approximately 47 % of the variance in overdose death rates each year. In keeping with the decline in opioid prescription rates, the explanatory power of opioid prescription rates weakened over the course of the study.

Conclusions

Overdose deaths increased at a constant exponential rate for the years that it was possible to apply our regression model. This occurred even though access to legal opioids decreased. What remained invariant was the predictive strength of intergenerational income mobility; each year it was the predictor that explained the most variance in overdose deaths.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有证据表明,代际收入流动性是预测美国中西部地区吸毒过量死亡的最有力因素。
背景:本报告的目标是量化阿片类药物处方率和收入不平等的社会经济相关因素对美国中西部 1055 个县药物过量死亡的预测程度。这项研究是对一项州级分析的跟进,该分析报告称,阿片类药物处方率、社会资本和失业率在很大程度上解释了阿片类药物过量致死率的差异(Heyman, McVicar, & Brownell, 2019):我们创建了一个数据集,其中包括吸毒过量死亡率、阿片类药物处方率以及收入不平等的相关因素。鉴于相关变量在州和县一级存在差异,我们采用了多层次回归的统计方法:从 2006 年到 2021 年,中西部吸毒过量死亡人数的增长与 1978 年到 2016 年全美吸毒过量死亡人数增长的指数方程非常接近(例如,Jalal 等人,2018 年)。阿片类处方药的零售额在 2006 年至 2012 年期间有所增加,但随后有所下降,到 2017 年已低于 2006 年的水平。回归分析表明,代际收入流动性是吸毒过量死亡的最强预测因素。其他持续具有统计意义的预测因素包括阿片类药物处方率、社会资本和失业率。这些预测因素加上师生比、单亲家庭和上大学等因素,每年约占吸毒过量死亡率差异的 47%。随着阿片类药物处方率的下降,阿片类药物处方率的解释力在研究过程中逐渐减弱:结论:在可以应用我们的回归模型的年份里,过量死亡人数以恒定的指数速度增长。尽管获得合法阿片类药物的机会减少了,但这一现象依然存在。保持不变的是代际收入流动性的预测强度;每年,它都是解释过量死亡差异最大的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022 Suboptimal uptake and placement of a mandatory alcohol pregnancy warning label in Australia Increases in employment over six months following Khanya: A secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial of a peer-delivered behavioral intervention for substance use and HIV medication adherence in Cape Town, South Africa The criminal careers of Australian drug traffickers Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cannabis cultivation and use in 18 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1