The efficacy of CBCT-based radiomics techniques in differentiating between conventional and unicystic ameloblastoma

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.010
Xiaoyan Sha MM , Chao Wang MS , Senrong Qi MD , Xiaohong Yuan MM , Hui Zhang PhD , Jigang Yang MD
{"title":"The efficacy of CBCT-based radiomics techniques in differentiating between conventional and unicystic ameloblastoma","authors":"Xiaoyan Sha MM ,&nbsp;Chao Wang MS ,&nbsp;Senrong Qi MD ,&nbsp;Xiaohong Yuan MM ,&nbsp;Hui Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Jigang Yang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to develop a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiomics-based model that differentiates between conventional and unicystic ameloblastoma (AB).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective study, CBCT images were collected from 100 patients who had ABs that were diagnosed histopathologically as conventional or unicystic AB after surgical treatment. The patients were randomly divided into training (70) and validation (30) cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from the images, and the optimal features were incorporated into 5 models: Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Random Forest, and XGBoost for prediction of tumor type. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 20 optimal radiomics features were incorporated into the Logistic Regression (LR) model, which exhibited the best overall performance with AUC = 0.936 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.877-0.996) for the training cohort and AUC = 0.929 (95% CI = 0.832-1.000) for the validation cohort. The nomogram combined the clinical features and the radiomics signature and resulted in the best predictive performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The LR model demonstrated the ability of radiomics and the nomogram to distinguish between the 2 types of AB and may have the potential to replace biopsies under noninvasive conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324003493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to develop a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiomics-based model that differentiates between conventional and unicystic ameloblastoma (AB).

Methods

In this retrospective study, CBCT images were collected from 100 patients who had ABs that were diagnosed histopathologically as conventional or unicystic AB after surgical treatment. The patients were randomly divided into training (70) and validation (30) cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from the images, and the optimal features were incorporated into 5 models: Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Random Forest, and XGBoost for prediction of tumor type. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The 20 optimal radiomics features were incorporated into the Logistic Regression (LR) model, which exhibited the best overall performance with AUC = 0.936 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.877-0.996) for the training cohort and AUC = 0.929 (95% CI = 0.832-1.000) for the validation cohort. The nomogram combined the clinical features and the radiomics signature and resulted in the best predictive performance.

Conclusions

The LR model demonstrated the ability of radiomics and the nomogram to distinguish between the 2 types of AB and may have the potential to replace biopsies under noninvasive conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 CBCT 的放射组学技术在区分传统釉母细胞瘤和单囊釉母细胞瘤方面的功效。
目的:本研究旨在开发一种基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的放射组学模型,以区分常规和单囊釉母细胞瘤(AB):本研究旨在开发一种基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)放射组学的模型,以区分传统型和单囊型母细胞瘤(AB):在这项回顾性研究中,研究人员收集了100名AB患者的CBCT图像,这些患者在手术治疗后经组织病理学诊断为传统型或单囊型AB。这些患者被随机分为训练组(70 人)和验证组(30 人)。从图像中提取放射组学特征,并将最佳特征纳入 5 个模型:逻辑回归模型、支持向量机模型、线性判别分析模型、随机森林模型和 XGBoost 模型用于预测肿瘤类型。使用接收者操作特征分析的曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性、准确性、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)对模型性能进行评估:训练队列的 AUC = 0.936(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 0.877-0.996),验证队列的 AUC = 0.929(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 0.832-1.000)。提名图结合了临床特征和放射组学特征,具有最佳预测效果:LR模型证明了放射组学和提名图区分2种类型AB的能力,并有可能在无创条件下取代活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1