Are very thin patients at a higher risk of complications when submitted to percutane-ous nephrolithotomy?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Braz J Urol Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0341
Priscila Kuriki Vieira Mota, Daniel Beltrame Ferreira, Rafael Felisberto Dias Florencio, David Jacques Cohen, Rodrigo Perrella, Carlos Alfredo Batagello, Claudio Bovolenta Murta, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro, Fabio C Vicentini
{"title":"Are very thin patients at a higher risk of complications when submitted to percutane-ous nephrolithotomy?","authors":"Priscila Kuriki Vieira Mota, Daniel Beltrame Ferreira, Rafael Felisberto Dias Florencio, David Jacques Cohen, Rodrigo Perrella, Carlos Alfredo Batagello, Claudio Bovolenta Murta, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro, Fabio C Vicentini","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of thinness on the outcome of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A matched case-control study was performed using a prospectively collected database of all patients who underwent PCNL between June 2011 and October 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to their phenotypic characteristics, arbitrarily defined according to their body mass index (BMI): <0kg/m2 (Group 1, very thin patients, G<20) and ≥25 kg/m2 (Group 2, non-thin patients, G≥25). Patients were randomly matched based on Guy's Stone Score (GSS) according to case complexity at a ratio of 1:3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 204 patients were enrolled in this study: 51 patients (G<20) and 153 controls (G≥25). Complications occurred in 15.2% of the patients, with 5.4% of these complications classified as major complications (Clavien grade ≥ 3). According to complications there were no significant differences between the groups. The overall complication rates were 17.6% in the G<20 and 14.4% in the G≥25 (p = 0.653). The major complication rates were 3.9% in the G<20 and 5.8% in the G≥25 (p=0.429). No differences in transfusion or urinary fistula rates were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, very thin patients were not at a higher risk of complications when submitted to PCNL than in those with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2. Apparently, this technique can be used in these patients, just as it is used in any other type of patient, independently of their BMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"50 6","pages":"746-753"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Braz J Urol","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of thinness on the outcome of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Materials and methods: A matched case-control study was performed using a prospectively collected database of all patients who underwent PCNL between June 2011 and October 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to their phenotypic characteristics, arbitrarily defined according to their body mass index (BMI): <0kg/m2 (Group 1, very thin patients, G<20) and ≥25 kg/m2 (Group 2, non-thin patients, G≥25). Patients were randomly matched based on Guy's Stone Score (GSS) according to case complexity at a ratio of 1:3.

Results: A total of 204 patients were enrolled in this study: 51 patients (G<20) and 153 controls (G≥25). Complications occurred in 15.2% of the patients, with 5.4% of these complications classified as major complications (Clavien grade ≥ 3). According to complications there were no significant differences between the groups. The overall complication rates were 17.6% in the G<20 and 14.4% in the G≥25 (p = 0.653). The major complication rates were 3.9% in the G<20 and 5.8% in the G≥25 (p=0.429). No differences in transfusion or urinary fistula rates were found.

Conclusions: In this study, very thin patients were not at a higher risk of complications when submitted to PCNL than in those with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2. Apparently, this technique can be used in these patients, just as it is used in any other type of patient, independently of their BMI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非常瘦弱的患者在接受经皮肾镜碎石术时发生并发症的风险是否更高?
目的:评估消瘦对经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)结果的影响:利用前瞻性收集的数据库,对 2011 年 6 月至 2021 年 10 月间接受 PCNL 的所有患者进行了匹配病例对照研究。根据表型特征将患者分为两组,并根据体重指数(BMI)进行任意定义:结果:共有 204 名患者参与了这项研究:51名患者(G结论:在这项研究中,与体重指数≥25 kg/m2 的患者相比,非常瘦的患者在接受 PCNL 时并没有更高的并发症风险。显然,这种技术可以用于这些病人,就像用于其他类型的病人一样,与他们的体重指数无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Braz J Urol
International Braz J Urol UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
21.60%
发文量
246
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Gleason 7 (3+4) and (4+3) Prostatic Adenocarcinomas with Prognostic Criteria and Immunohistochemical Profiles of AMACR, PSA and Ki-67. Effects of Chronic Stress and Comfort Food in Testicular Morphology in Adult Wistar Rats. The Management of Children and Adolescents with Overactive Bladder Refractory to Treatment with Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. 2025: The year in which the International Brazilian Journal of Urology will be able to consolidate itself as one of the most important in urology. Advancing Telesurgery Connectivity Between North and South America: the first Remote Surgery Conducted Between Orlando and São Paulo in Animal Models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1