Acceptability of Teleconsultation Services for HIV Care in Nigeria: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0196
Bilkisu Z Iliyasu, Zubairu Iliyasu, Aminatu A Kwaku, Abdullahi Sani, Nafisa S Nass, Taiwo G Amole, Hadiza M Abdullahi, Amina U Abdullahi, Fatimah I Tsiga-Ahmed, Abubakar M Jibo, Humayra A Bashir MBBCh, Hamisu M Salihu, Muktar H Aliyu
{"title":"Acceptability of Teleconsultation Services for HIV Care in Nigeria: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Bilkisu Z Iliyasu, Zubairu Iliyasu, Aminatu A Kwaku, Abdullahi Sani, Nafisa S Nass, Taiwo G Amole, Hadiza M Abdullahi, Amina U Abdullahi, Fatimah I Tsiga-Ahmed, Abubakar M Jibo, Humayra A Bashir MBBCh, Hamisu M Salihu, Muktar H Aliyu","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Access to HIV care remains challenging, especially for patients living in remote areas, despite advances in antiretroviral treatment. The acceptability of teleconsultations for routine HIV care post-COVID is not well-explored. We explored factors influencing teleconsultation acceptability among people living with HIV (PLWH) and attending a tertiary care center in Kano, Nigeria. <b>Methods:</b> We used a cross-sectional mixed methods study design. Structured questionnaires were administered to 415 PLWH, supplemented by in-depth interviews with a subsample (<i>n</i> = 20). Logistic regression models and thematic analysis were used for data analyses. <b>Results:</b> Of 415 respondents, 55.7% (<i>n</i> = 231) expressed willingness for teleconsultations. Primary motivations included convenience/efficiency (46.7%, <i>n</i> = 194), elimination of travel expenses (31.8%, <i>n</i> = 132), and remote access to specialist care (17.3%, <i>n</i> = 72). Reasons for reluctance included distrust of technology (61.9%, <i>n</i> = 260) and privacy concerns (37.1%, <i>n</i> = 156). Acceptance was higher among males (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12-3.72), participants with at least secondary education (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.27-4.97), monthly income ≥30,000 Naira (aOR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.21-7.31), currently married (aOR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.16-5.65), and participants without comorbidities (aOR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.18-4.24). PLWH who self-assessed as being in good health (aOR = 3.77, 95% CI = 1.44-9.94), used the internet regularly (aOR = 3.12, 95% CI = 2.17-5.37), or were aware of telemedicine (aOR = 3.24, 95% CI = 2.45-7.68) were also more accepting of telehealth services. Themes highlighted the need to offer teleconsultation as an optional service. <b>Conclusion:</b> Teleconsultation acceptance among PLWH was influenced by sociodemographic, clinical, and technology-related factors. Successful integration of teleconsultation services for PLWH in similar settings necessitates targeted educational interventions and assessment of organizational readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Access to HIV care remains challenging, especially for patients living in remote areas, despite advances in antiretroviral treatment. The acceptability of teleconsultations for routine HIV care post-COVID is not well-explored. We explored factors influencing teleconsultation acceptability among people living with HIV (PLWH) and attending a tertiary care center in Kano, Nigeria. Methods: We used a cross-sectional mixed methods study design. Structured questionnaires were administered to 415 PLWH, supplemented by in-depth interviews with a subsample (n = 20). Logistic regression models and thematic analysis were used for data analyses. Results: Of 415 respondents, 55.7% (n = 231) expressed willingness for teleconsultations. Primary motivations included convenience/efficiency (46.7%, n = 194), elimination of travel expenses (31.8%, n = 132), and remote access to specialist care (17.3%, n = 72). Reasons for reluctance included distrust of technology (61.9%, n = 260) and privacy concerns (37.1%, n = 156). Acceptance was higher among males (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12-3.72), participants with at least secondary education (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.27-4.97), monthly income ≥30,000 Naira (aOR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.21-7.31), currently married (aOR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.16-5.65), and participants without comorbidities (aOR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.18-4.24). PLWH who self-assessed as being in good health (aOR = 3.77, 95% CI = 1.44-9.94), used the internet regularly (aOR = 3.12, 95% CI = 2.17-5.37), or were aware of telemedicine (aOR = 3.24, 95% CI = 2.45-7.68) were also more accepting of telehealth services. Themes highlighted the need to offer teleconsultation as an optional service. Conclusion: Teleconsultation acceptance among PLWH was influenced by sociodemographic, clinical, and technology-related factors. Successful integration of teleconsultation services for PLWH in similar settings necessitates targeted educational interventions and assessment of organizational readiness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚艾滋病毒护理远程咨询服务的可接受性:混合方法研究。
导言:尽管抗逆转录病毒治疗取得了进展,但获得艾滋病护理仍然是一项挑战,尤其是对于生活在偏远地区的患者而言。目前还没有很好地探讨 COVID 后常规 HIV 护理中远程会诊的可接受性。我们探讨了影响在尼日利亚卡诺的一家三级医疗中心就诊的 HIV 感染者(PLWH)接受远程会诊的因素。研究方法我们采用了横断面混合方法研究设计。对 415 名艾滋病病毒感染者进行了结构化问卷调查,并对部分样本(n = 20)进行了深入访谈。数据分析采用逻辑回归模型和主题分析法。结果:在 415 名受访者中,55.7%(n = 231)表示愿意接受远程会诊。主要动机包括方便/高效(46.7%,n = 194)、省去差旅费(31.8%,n = 132)和远程获得专家护理(17.3%,n = 72)。不情愿的原因包括对技术的不信任(61.9%,n = 260)和对隐私的担忧(37.1%,n = 156)。男性(调整后的几率比(aOR)=1.58,95% 置信区间(CI)=1.12-3.72)、至少接受过中等教育(aOR = 1.47,95% CI = 1.27-4.97)、月收入≥30 万元(n = 260)的参与者对该技术的接受度更高。97)、月收入≥30,000 奈拉(aOR = 2.16,95% CI = 1.21-7.31)、目前已婚(aOR = 3.26,95% CI = 1.16-5.65)、无合并症(aOR = 2.03,95% CI = 1.18-4.24)。自我评估健康状况良好(aOR = 3.77,95% CI = 1.44-9.94)、经常使用互联网(aOR = 3.12,95% CI = 2.17-5.37)或了解远程医疗(aOR = 3.24,95% CI = 2.45-7.68)的 PLWH 也更容易接受远程保健服务。相关主题强调了将远程会诊作为一种可选服务的必要性。结论PLWH 对远程会诊的接受程度受社会人口、临床和技术相关因素的影响。要在类似环境中成功整合针对 PLWH 的远程会诊服务,就必须采取有针对性的教育干预措施,并对机构的准备情况进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Telehealth in the United States: Are There Racial/Ethnic Differences? Disparities in Telehealth Offer and Use among U.S. Adults: 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth Services in Primary Care. Examination of Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Clinic Experience During COVID-19 in MNGHA, Saudi Arabia. Practical Experience with the Use of Electronic Headache Diaries and Video Consultations in Migraine Care from a Longitudinal Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1