Population-based estimates of major forms of housing insecurity among community-living older Americans.

Lucero G Paredes, Yi Wang, Danya E Keene, Thomas Gill, Robert D Becher
{"title":"Population-based estimates of major forms of housing insecurity among community-living older Americans.","authors":"Lucero G Paredes, Yi Wang, Danya E Keene, Thomas Gill, Robert D Becher","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The number of older adults struggling to maintain adequate housing is growing. Prior studies have used various criteria to measure housing insecurity; however, no standardized definition exists to date. Using a multidimensional approach, our study sought to calculate population-based estimates of various forms of housing insecurity among community-living older Americans and determine how these estimates differ across key characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized data from the 2011 round of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a prospective longitudinal study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older. Three key forms of housing insecurity were operationalized: poor housing affordability (PHA), poor housing quality (PHQ), and poor neighborhood quality (PNQ). Population-based estimates of these forms of housing insecurity were calculated using analytic sampling weights and stratified by age, gender, race and ethnicity, frailty status, and dementia status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 6466 participants were included in the analysis, representing 29,848,119 community-living older Americans. The mean (standard deviation) age was 77.3 (7.7) years; by weighted percentages, 56.0% identified as female, 81.3% as White, 8.2% Black, and 7.1% Hispanic. At least one form of housing insecurity was identified in 38.5% of older Americans. Individually, the prevalence of PHA was 14.8%, PHQ 24%, and PNQ 12.5%. The prevalence of at least one form of housing insecurity was higher among persons of color (62.9% Black and 66% Hispanic vs White; p < 0.001), those with frailty (40.9% pre-frail and 49.4% frail vs robust; p < 0.001), and those with cognitive impairment (48.1% possible and 51% probable dementia vs no dementia; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Nearly one in three community-living older Americans experience at least one form of housing insecurity. This was most common among vulnerable subgroups. Our multidimensional approach to defining various forms of housing insecurity can be used for future studies focused on improving social determinants of health among high-risk older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The number of older adults struggling to maintain adequate housing is growing. Prior studies have used various criteria to measure housing insecurity; however, no standardized definition exists to date. Using a multidimensional approach, our study sought to calculate population-based estimates of various forms of housing insecurity among community-living older Americans and determine how these estimates differ across key characteristics.

Methods: This study utilized data from the 2011 round of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a prospective longitudinal study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older. Three key forms of housing insecurity were operationalized: poor housing affordability (PHA), poor housing quality (PHQ), and poor neighborhood quality (PNQ). Population-based estimates of these forms of housing insecurity were calculated using analytic sampling weights and stratified by age, gender, race and ethnicity, frailty status, and dementia status.

Results: Totally 6466 participants were included in the analysis, representing 29,848,119 community-living older Americans. The mean (standard deviation) age was 77.3 (7.7) years; by weighted percentages, 56.0% identified as female, 81.3% as White, 8.2% Black, and 7.1% Hispanic. At least one form of housing insecurity was identified in 38.5% of older Americans. Individually, the prevalence of PHA was 14.8%, PHQ 24%, and PNQ 12.5%. The prevalence of at least one form of housing insecurity was higher among persons of color (62.9% Black and 66% Hispanic vs White; p < 0.001), those with frailty (40.9% pre-frail and 49.4% frail vs robust; p < 0.001), and those with cognitive impairment (48.1% possible and 51% probable dementia vs no dementia; p < 0.001).

Discussion: Nearly one in three community-living older Americans experience at least one form of housing insecurity. This was most common among vulnerable subgroups. Our multidimensional approach to defining various forms of housing insecurity can be used for future studies focused on improving social determinants of health among high-risk older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以人口为基础估算在社区生活的美国老年人主要的住房不安全形式。
目标:为维持适当住房而挣扎的老年人越来越多。之前的研究使用了各种标准来衡量住房不安全状况;但是,迄今为止还没有一个标准化的定义。我们的研究采用了一种多维方法,试图计算以人口为基础的、在社区生活的美国老年人各种形式的住房不安全估计值,并确定这些估计值在不同的关键特征下有何差异:这项研究利用了 2011 年 "全国健康与老龄化趋势研究"(NHATS)的数据,这是一项针对 65 岁或以上医疗保险受益人的前瞻性纵向研究。住房不安全的三种主要形式是:住房负担能力差 (PHA)、住房质量差 (PHQ) 和邻里质量差 (PNQ)。这些住房不安全形式的人口估计值采用分析抽样加权法进行计算,并按年龄、性别、种族和民族、虚弱状态和痴呆状态进行分层:共有 6466 名参与者参与了分析,代表了 29848119 名在社区生活的美国老年人。平均年龄(标准差)为 77.3(7.7)岁;按加权百分比计算,56.0% 为女性,81.3% 为白人,8.2% 为黑人,7.1% 为西班牙裔。38.5%的美国老年人至少存在一种住房不安全状况。个别而言,PHA 的流行率为 14.8%,PHQ 为 24%,PNQ 为 12.5%。有色人种中至少有一种住房无保障的比例更高(黑人为 62.9%,西班牙裔与白人相比为 66%;P 讨论):近三分之一在社区生活的美国老年人至少经历过一种形式的住房不安全。这种情况在弱势亚群体中最为常见。我们采用多维方法来定义各种形式的住房不安全问题,可用于今后重点改善高风险老年人健康社会决定因素的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Caring for dementia caregivers: How well does social risk screening reflect unmet needs? End-of-life emergency department use and healthcare expenditures among older adults: A nationally representative study. Antipsychotics for nursing home residents with dementia: Chemical restraints or essential therapeutic intervention? Identifying and quantifying potentially problematic prescribing cascades in clinical practice: A mixed-methods study. Clinical momentum in the care of older adults with advanced dementia: What evidence is there in the medical record?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1