Atomistic understanding of ductile-to-brittle transition in single crystal Si and GaAs under nanoscratch

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Mechanical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109689
{"title":"Atomistic understanding of ductile-to-brittle transition in single crystal Si and GaAs under nanoscratch","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ensuring ductile removal in a grinding process is crucial for achieving the desired finish on a hard and brittle single crystal. This study provides new insights into the material removal processes in Si and GaAs single crystals, exploring their deformation behaviour using Berkovich and Conical tips to replicate contact from a fixed abrasive grit. Experimental observations are compared with Molecular Dynamic (MD) simulations to uncover the atomistic deformation mechanisms during the ductile-to-brittle transition (DBT). Notable plastic deformation and minimal cracking were consistently observed in Si, irrespective of the tips used. MD simulations supported this observation, revealing pronounced chip formation indicative of ductile material removal. The resistance to cracking in Si was attributed to amorphization induced by localized high contact stresses. In contrast, GaAs showed a propensity for cracking, with MD simulations revealing dislocation and slip band formation, and cracks emerging in the areas of substantial plastic deformation. These findings address phenomena not previously discernible in experimental studies due to the challenge of real-time observation. Moreover, the tip geometry was shown to significantly influence stress distribution, impacting deformation and crack formation in GaAs. This study also reveals limitations in predicting the critical depth for DBT in both Si and GaAs throught the amended Bifano, Dow, and Scattergood (aBDS) models and MD simulation, offering nuanced insights into these challenges that have not been extensively explored. It was found that the experimental results exceeded predictions by an order of magnitude. These discrepancies underscore the aBDS model's disregard for essential material properties and tip geometry, while the disparities between MD simulation and experiment are primarily attributed to the inherent limitations in the simulated length scales and challenges in detecting initial subsurface cracks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020740324007306/pdfft?md5=85671af12052b03c49741058e63a7489&pid=1-s2.0-S0020740324007306-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020740324007306","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring ductile removal in a grinding process is crucial for achieving the desired finish on a hard and brittle single crystal. This study provides new insights into the material removal processes in Si and GaAs single crystals, exploring their deformation behaviour using Berkovich and Conical tips to replicate contact from a fixed abrasive grit. Experimental observations are compared with Molecular Dynamic (MD) simulations to uncover the atomistic deformation mechanisms during the ductile-to-brittle transition (DBT). Notable plastic deformation and minimal cracking were consistently observed in Si, irrespective of the tips used. MD simulations supported this observation, revealing pronounced chip formation indicative of ductile material removal. The resistance to cracking in Si was attributed to amorphization induced by localized high contact stresses. In contrast, GaAs showed a propensity for cracking, with MD simulations revealing dislocation and slip band formation, and cracks emerging in the areas of substantial plastic deformation. These findings address phenomena not previously discernible in experimental studies due to the challenge of real-time observation. Moreover, the tip geometry was shown to significantly influence stress distribution, impacting deformation and crack formation in GaAs. This study also reveals limitations in predicting the critical depth for DBT in both Si and GaAs throught the amended Bifano, Dow, and Scattergood (aBDS) models and MD simulation, offering nuanced insights into these challenges that have not been extensively explored. It was found that the experimental results exceeded predictions by an order of magnitude. These discrepancies underscore the aBDS model's disregard for essential material properties and tip geometry, while the disparities between MD simulation and experiment are primarily attributed to the inherent limitations in the simulated length scales and challenges in detecting initial subsurface cracks.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从原子角度理解硅和砷化镓单晶在纳米划痕作用下的韧性到脆性转变
要在硬脆单晶上获得理想的光洁度,确保研磨过程中的韧性去除至关重要。本研究对硅和砷化镓单晶的材料去除过程提供了新的见解,使用 Berkovich 和锥形针尖复制固定磨粒的接触,探索其变形行为。实验观察结果与分子动力学(MD)模拟结果相比较,揭示了韧性到脆性转变(DBT)过程中的原子变形机制。无论使用哪种磨头,在硅中都能持续观察到显著的塑性变形和最小的裂纹。MD 模拟支持了这一观察结果,显示出明显的切屑形成,表明材料的韧性去除。硅的抗开裂性归因于局部高接触应力引起的非晶化。与此相反,砷化镓则显示出开裂倾向,MD 模拟显示出位错和滑移带的形成,以及大量塑性变形区域出现的裂纹。由于实时观测的挑战性,这些发现解决了以前在实验研究中无法辨别的现象。此外,研究还表明,针尖的几何形状会显著影响应力分布,进而影响砷化镓的变形和裂纹形成。这项研究还揭示了通过修正的 Bifano、Dow 和 Scattergood(aBDS)模型和 MD 仿真预测硅和砷化镓中 DBT 临界深度的局限性,为这些尚未广泛探讨的挑战提供了细致入微的见解。研究发现,实验结果比预测结果超出了一个数量级。这些差异凸显了 aBDS 模型对基本材料属性和尖端几何形状的忽视,而 MD 模拟和实验之间的差异主要归因于模拟长度尺度的固有限制和检测初始次表面裂纹的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
17.80%
发文量
769
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mechanical Sciences (IJMS) serves as a global platform for the publication and dissemination of original research that contributes to a deeper scientific understanding of the fundamental disciplines within mechanical, civil, and material engineering. The primary focus of IJMS is to showcase innovative and ground-breaking work that utilizes analytical and computational modeling techniques, such as Finite Element Method (FEM), Boundary Element Method (BEM), and mesh-free methods, among others. These modeling methods are applied to diverse fields including rigid-body mechanics (e.g., dynamics, vibration, stability), structural mechanics, metal forming, advanced materials (e.g., metals, composites, cellular, smart) behavior and applications, impact mechanics, strain localization, and other nonlinear effects (e.g., large deflections, plasticity, fracture). Additionally, IJMS covers the realms of fluid mechanics (both external and internal flows), tribology, thermodynamics, and materials processing. These subjects collectively form the core of the journal's content. In summary, IJMS provides a prestigious platform for researchers to present their original contributions, shedding light on analytical and computational modeling methods in various areas of mechanical engineering, as well as exploring the behavior and application of advanced materials, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and materials processing.
期刊最新文献
Nonlinear dynamic behavior of a rotor-bearing system considering time-varying misalignment Energy absorption of the kirigami-inspired pyramid foldcore sandwich structures under low-velocity impact Modeling the coupled bubble-arc-droplet evolution in underwater flux-cored arc welding A GAN-based stepwise full-field mechanical prediction model for architected metamaterials Backward motion suppression in space-constrained piezoelectric pipeline robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1