Navigating the temporal commitments of entrepreneurial hype: Insights from entrepreneur and backer interactions in crowdfunded ventures

IF 7.7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Venturing Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106437
Matthew S. Wood , Sean M. Dwyer , David J. Scheaf
{"title":"Navigating the temporal commitments of entrepreneurial hype: Insights from entrepreneur and backer interactions in crowdfunded ventures","authors":"Matthew S. Wood ,&nbsp;Sean M. Dwyer ,&nbsp;David J. Scheaf","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines how entrepreneurs manage temporal commitments associated with hyped audience expectations. We examine hype in the crowdfunding context, conducting an inductive study of 155 entrepreneur project updates from five new ventures that mobilized significant funding on Kickstarter. Entrepreneur updates were matched with 17,807 backer comments, creating call and response pairs. Using LIWC sentiment analysis, we tracked changes in backer negative tone over time and observed spikes and dips corresponding with temporal events. The pattern suggested that entrepreneurs have techniques to tamp down negative sentiment from backers as they delay product shipments. Through inductive examination of entrepreneur and backer interactions, we uncover entrepreneurs' use of four narrative practices to manage the temporal constraints of hyped audience expectations: frequent communication, evidence of progress, proximal temporal reach, and time-quality trade-off. While initially effective, these practices have diminishing returns over time, eventually triggering backer outrage as continual delays frustrate backers. We additionally find that the effectiveness of the narrative practices is influenced by external temporal pacers, with entrepreneurs using pacers to amplify narrative practice effectiveness, while backers use them as reasons to reject delays.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"39 6","pages":"Article 106437"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902624000594/pdfft?md5=5e65bd538f6d434e89a76d20d07eaba9&pid=1-s2.0-S0883902624000594-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902624000594","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines how entrepreneurs manage temporal commitments associated with hyped audience expectations. We examine hype in the crowdfunding context, conducting an inductive study of 155 entrepreneur project updates from five new ventures that mobilized significant funding on Kickstarter. Entrepreneur updates were matched with 17,807 backer comments, creating call and response pairs. Using LIWC sentiment analysis, we tracked changes in backer negative tone over time and observed spikes and dips corresponding with temporal events. The pattern suggested that entrepreneurs have techniques to tamp down negative sentiment from backers as they delay product shipments. Through inductive examination of entrepreneur and backer interactions, we uncover entrepreneurs' use of four narrative practices to manage the temporal constraints of hyped audience expectations: frequent communication, evidence of progress, proximal temporal reach, and time-quality trade-off. While initially effective, these practices have diminishing returns over time, eventually triggering backer outrage as continual delays frustrate backers. We additionally find that the effectiveness of the narrative practices is influenced by external temporal pacers, with entrepreneurs using pacers to amplify narrative practice effectiveness, while backers use them as reasons to reject delays.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驾驭创业炒作的时间承诺:从众筹企业中创业者与支持者的互动中窥见一斑
本文探讨了创业者如何管理与受众过高期望相关的时间承诺。我们研究了众筹背景下的炒作,对来自五个在 Kickstarter 上筹集到大量资金的新企业的 155 个企业家项目更新进行了归纳研究。创业者更新与 17807 条支持者评论相匹配,形成呼叫和响应对。利用 LIWC 情感分析,我们跟踪了支持者负面语气随时间的变化,并观察到了与时间事件相对应的峰值和谷值。这种模式表明,创业者在推迟产品发货的同时,还掌握了抑制支持者负面情绪的技巧。通过对创业者和支持者互动的归纳研究,我们发现创业者使用了四种叙事方法来管理受众过高期望的时间限制:频繁沟通、进展证据、近距离时间接触和时间质量权衡。虽然这些做法最初很有效,但随着时间的推移,其收益会逐渐减少,最终会引发支持者的愤怒,因为持续的延迟会让支持者感到沮丧。我们还发现,叙述性实践的有效性受到外部时间性起搏器的影响,创业者利用起搏器来扩大叙述性实践的有效性,而支持者则利用起搏器作为拒绝延迟的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
59
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Venturing: Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Finance, Innovation and Regional Development serves as a scholarly platform for the exchange of valuable insights, theories, narratives, and interpretations related to entrepreneurship and its implications. With a focus on enriching the understanding of entrepreneurship in its various manifestations, the journal seeks to publish papers that (1) draw from the experiences of entrepreneurs, innovators, and their ecosystem; and (2) tackle issues relevant to scholars, educators, facilitators, and practitioners involved in entrepreneurship. Embracing diversity in approach, methodology, and disciplinary perspective, the journal encourages contributions that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in entrepreneurship and its associated domains.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking entrepreneurship in causally entangled crises: A poly-crisis perspective Amplifying angels: Evidence from the INVEST program False signaling by platform team members and post-campaign venture outcomes: Evidence from an equity crowdfunding platform Funding-source-induced bias: How social ties influence entrepreneurs' anticipated guilt and risk-taking preferences Effect of venture capital investment horizon on new product development: Evidence from the medical device sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1