Evaluation of anatomical landmark consistency in the external auditory meatus using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging

Fernanda Sanders-Mello, Julius de Schwartz, Jan Harm Koolstra
{"title":"Evaluation of anatomical landmark consistency in the external auditory meatus using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging","authors":"Fernanda Sanders-Mello,&nbsp;Julius de Schwartz,&nbsp;Jan Harm Koolstra","doi":"10.1016/j.tria.2024.100340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The present study evaluated the consistency and reliability of five anatomical landmarks in the external auditory meatus using CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) scans. The goal was to determine if these landmarks could reliably replace the commonly used point Porion for superimposing CBCT scans in clinical practice. Consistent anatomical features in the external auditory meatus are essential for accurate cranial assessments in dentistry and medicine. Despite their importance, these features have been underexplored, making this study a valuable contribution to improving clinical evaluation accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>22 CBCT scans were analyzed using ITK-Snap software. The shape of the External Auditory Meatus had been rendered by segmentation. These segmentations were used as a basis to locate the landmarks. The spread in location of the suggested landmarks concerning a reference coordinate system was treated as a measure for consistency. For that purpose, the absolute mean distance from all registered landmarks to the center of the location cloud was calculated for each dataset.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The smallest spread in locations was measured for the so-called Epitympanic Notch, with 4.3 mm on average (SD 1.7). However, recognizing this landmark in the segmented images appeared to be relatively difficult. The landmark with the second smallest spread in locations (4.4 mm (SD 2.2)) and an easier recognition in the segmented image was the most superior point of the external auditory meatus. The most inferior point appeared to be the least reliable of all five landmarks.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on the present study, a consistently reliable landmark in the External Auditory Meatus to replace point Porion could not be identified. The hypothesis that any landmark could suffice for superimposing CBCT scans was not confirmed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37913,"journal":{"name":"Translational Research in Anatomy","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000645/pdfft?md5=28b5d12c4b212649f8bf296276e2b331&pid=1-s2.0-S2214854X24000645-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Research in Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The present study evaluated the consistency and reliability of five anatomical landmarks in the external auditory meatus using CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) scans. The goal was to determine if these landmarks could reliably replace the commonly used point Porion for superimposing CBCT scans in clinical practice. Consistent anatomical features in the external auditory meatus are essential for accurate cranial assessments in dentistry and medicine. Despite their importance, these features have been underexplored, making this study a valuable contribution to improving clinical evaluation accuracy.

Materials and methods

22 CBCT scans were analyzed using ITK-Snap software. The shape of the External Auditory Meatus had been rendered by segmentation. These segmentations were used as a basis to locate the landmarks. The spread in location of the suggested landmarks concerning a reference coordinate system was treated as a measure for consistency. For that purpose, the absolute mean distance from all registered landmarks to the center of the location cloud was calculated for each dataset.

Results

The smallest spread in locations was measured for the so-called Epitympanic Notch, with 4.3 mm on average (SD 1.7). However, recognizing this landmark in the segmented images appeared to be relatively difficult. The landmark with the second smallest spread in locations (4.4 mm (SD 2.2)) and an easier recognition in the segmented image was the most superior point of the external auditory meatus. The most inferior point appeared to be the least reliable of all five landmarks.

Conclusion

Based on the present study, a consistently reliable landmark in the External Auditory Meatus to replace point Porion could not be identified. The hypothesis that any landmark could suffice for superimposing CBCT scans was not confirmed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用锥束计算机断层扫描 (CBCT) 成像评估外耳道解剖标志的一致性
导言:本研究使用 CBCT(锥束计算机断层扫描)扫描评估了外耳道五个解剖地标的一致性和可靠性。目的是确定这些地标能否可靠地取代临床实践中常用的点 Porion,用于叠加 CBCT 扫描。外耳道一致的解剖特征对于牙科和医学中准确的头颅评估至关重要。尽管这些特征非常重要,但却没有得到充分的研究,因此本研究对提高临床评估的准确性做出了宝贵的贡献。材料和方法22 使用 ITK-Snap 软件对 CBCT 扫描进行分析。外耳道的形状已通过分割得到。这些分割结果被用作定位地标的基础。建议的地标位置与参考坐标系之间的差异被视为一致性的衡量标准。为此,我们计算了每个数据集中所有注册地标到定位云中心的绝对平均距离。然而,在分割图像中识别这一地标似乎相对困难。位置分布第二小(4.4 毫米(标准差 2.2))且在分割图像中较容易识别的地标是外耳道的最上点。结论根据本研究,外耳道内无法找到一个始终可靠的地标来替代 Porion 点。任何地标都能满足叠加 CBCT 扫描的假设并未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Translational Research in Anatomy is an international peer-reviewed and open access journal that publishes high-quality original papers. Focusing on translational research, the journal aims to disseminate the knowledge that is gained in the basic science of anatomy and to apply it to the diagnosis and treatment of human pathology in order to improve individual patient well-being. Topics published in Translational Research in Anatomy include anatomy in all of its aspects, especially those that have application to other scientific disciplines including the health sciences: • gross anatomy • neuroanatomy • histology • immunohistochemistry • comparative anatomy • embryology • molecular biology • microscopic anatomy • forensics • imaging/radiology • medical education Priority will be given to studies that clearly articulate their relevance to the broader aspects of anatomy and how they can impact patient care.Strengthening the ties between morphological research and medicine will foster collaboration between anatomists and physicians. Therefore, Translational Research in Anatomy will serve as a platform for communication and understanding between the disciplines of anatomy and medicine and will aid in the dissemination of anatomical research. The journal accepts the following article types: 1. Review articles 2. Original research papers 3. New state-of-the-art methods of research in the field of anatomy including imaging, dissection methods, medical devices and quantitation 4. Education papers (teaching technologies/methods in medical education in anatomy) 5. Commentaries 6. Letters to the Editor 7. Selected conference papers 8. Case Reports
期刊最新文献
Median nerve piercing the humeral head of pronator teres muscle: An anatomical case report of atypical median nerve formation and course Sex and stature estimations from dry femurs of Northeastern Thais: Using a logistic and linear regression approach Variations of the ulnar nerve within the ulnar tunnel and palm in a select South African population Exploring the bone tissue: Instrumental methods for characterization and biomedical research application Effect of metformin on the neuronal morphology of frontal cortex and hippocampal regions in lipopolysaccharide induced neuroinflammation in male Wistar rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1