Fernanda Sanders-Mello, Julius de Schwartz, Jan Harm Koolstra
{"title":"Evaluation of anatomical landmark consistency in the external auditory meatus using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging","authors":"Fernanda Sanders-Mello, Julius de Schwartz, Jan Harm Koolstra","doi":"10.1016/j.tria.2024.100340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The present study evaluated the consistency and reliability of five anatomical landmarks in the external auditory meatus using CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) scans. The goal was to determine if these landmarks could reliably replace the commonly used point Porion for superimposing CBCT scans in clinical practice. Consistent anatomical features in the external auditory meatus are essential for accurate cranial assessments in dentistry and medicine. Despite their importance, these features have been underexplored, making this study a valuable contribution to improving clinical evaluation accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>22 CBCT scans were analyzed using ITK-Snap software. The shape of the External Auditory Meatus had been rendered by segmentation. These segmentations were used as a basis to locate the landmarks. The spread in location of the suggested landmarks concerning a reference coordinate system was treated as a measure for consistency. For that purpose, the absolute mean distance from all registered landmarks to the center of the location cloud was calculated for each dataset.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The smallest spread in locations was measured for the so-called Epitympanic Notch, with 4.3 mm on average (SD 1.7). However, recognizing this landmark in the segmented images appeared to be relatively difficult. The landmark with the second smallest spread in locations (4.4 mm (SD 2.2)) and an easier recognition in the segmented image was the most superior point of the external auditory meatus. The most inferior point appeared to be the least reliable of all five landmarks.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on the present study, a consistently reliable landmark in the External Auditory Meatus to replace point Porion could not be identified. The hypothesis that any landmark could suffice for superimposing CBCT scans was not confirmed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37913,"journal":{"name":"Translational Research in Anatomy","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000645/pdfft?md5=28b5d12c4b212649f8bf296276e2b331&pid=1-s2.0-S2214854X24000645-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Research in Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The present study evaluated the consistency and reliability of five anatomical landmarks in the external auditory meatus using CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) scans. The goal was to determine if these landmarks could reliably replace the commonly used point Porion for superimposing CBCT scans in clinical practice. Consistent anatomical features in the external auditory meatus are essential for accurate cranial assessments in dentistry and medicine. Despite their importance, these features have been underexplored, making this study a valuable contribution to improving clinical evaluation accuracy.
Materials and methods
22 CBCT scans were analyzed using ITK-Snap software. The shape of the External Auditory Meatus had been rendered by segmentation. These segmentations were used as a basis to locate the landmarks. The spread in location of the suggested landmarks concerning a reference coordinate system was treated as a measure for consistency. For that purpose, the absolute mean distance from all registered landmarks to the center of the location cloud was calculated for each dataset.
Results
The smallest spread in locations was measured for the so-called Epitympanic Notch, with 4.3 mm on average (SD 1.7). However, recognizing this landmark in the segmented images appeared to be relatively difficult. The landmark with the second smallest spread in locations (4.4 mm (SD 2.2)) and an easier recognition in the segmented image was the most superior point of the external auditory meatus. The most inferior point appeared to be the least reliable of all five landmarks.
Conclusion
Based on the present study, a consistently reliable landmark in the External Auditory Meatus to replace point Porion could not be identified. The hypothesis that any landmark could suffice for superimposing CBCT scans was not confirmed.
期刊介绍:
Translational Research in Anatomy is an international peer-reviewed and open access journal that publishes high-quality original papers. Focusing on translational research, the journal aims to disseminate the knowledge that is gained in the basic science of anatomy and to apply it to the diagnosis and treatment of human pathology in order to improve individual patient well-being. Topics published in Translational Research in Anatomy include anatomy in all of its aspects, especially those that have application to other scientific disciplines including the health sciences: • gross anatomy • neuroanatomy • histology • immunohistochemistry • comparative anatomy • embryology • molecular biology • microscopic anatomy • forensics • imaging/radiology • medical education Priority will be given to studies that clearly articulate their relevance to the broader aspects of anatomy and how they can impact patient care.Strengthening the ties between morphological research and medicine will foster collaboration between anatomists and physicians. Therefore, Translational Research in Anatomy will serve as a platform for communication and understanding between the disciplines of anatomy and medicine and will aid in the dissemination of anatomical research. The journal accepts the following article types: 1. Review articles 2. Original research papers 3. New state-of-the-art methods of research in the field of anatomy including imaging, dissection methods, medical devices and quantitation 4. Education papers (teaching technologies/methods in medical education in anatomy) 5. Commentaries 6. Letters to the Editor 7. Selected conference papers 8. Case Reports