Child protection and developmental trajectories of children who entered care as infants

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse Review Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1002/car.2900
Fernando Lima, Stephanie Taplin, Miriam Maclean, Olivia Octoman, Mariko Grose, Melissa O'Donnell
{"title":"Child protection and developmental trajectories of children who entered care as infants","authors":"Fernando Lima,&nbsp;Stephanie Taplin,&nbsp;Miriam Maclean,&nbsp;Olivia Octoman,&nbsp;Mariko Grose,&nbsp;Melissa O'Donnell","doi":"10.1002/car.2900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infants have the highest rate of admission into out-of-home care in Australia, with rising rates of entry to care occurring around the world. Our previous research identified children who entered care as infants as having high levels of developmental vulnerability. The objective of this study was to determine the child protection and developmental trajectories of children who entered care as infants and whether meeting developmental needs through service provision improves trajectories and outcomes for these children. This is a prospective cohort study using three waves (2011–2016) of survey data from the New South Wales Pathways of Care Longitudinal Study which includes standardised assessments (Age and Stages Questionnaire, Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment and the Child Behaviour Checklist), as well as linked administrative child protection and health data. Our findings suggest that children who entered care as infants predominantly remained in the care system and had a high level of developmental vulnerability as infants. A large group had positive physical and cognitive developmental trajectories with service provision increasing over time; however, early service provision is needed. Another group was identified as having early social–emotional concerns and displaying worsening social–emotional trajectories. Intervention for this group is an important priority to reduce risk of ongoing poor mental health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47371,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse Review","volume":"33 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/car.2900","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.2900","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infants have the highest rate of admission into out-of-home care in Australia, with rising rates of entry to care occurring around the world. Our previous research identified children who entered care as infants as having high levels of developmental vulnerability. The objective of this study was to determine the child protection and developmental trajectories of children who entered care as infants and whether meeting developmental needs through service provision improves trajectories and outcomes for these children. This is a prospective cohort study using three waves (2011–2016) of survey data from the New South Wales Pathways of Care Longitudinal Study which includes standardised assessments (Age and Stages Questionnaire, Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment and the Child Behaviour Checklist), as well as linked administrative child protection and health data. Our findings suggest that children who entered care as infants predominantly remained in the care system and had a high level of developmental vulnerability as infants. A large group had positive physical and cognitive developmental trajectories with service provision increasing over time; however, early service provision is needed. Another group was identified as having early social–emotional concerns and displaying worsening social–emotional trajectories. Intervention for this group is an important priority to reduce risk of ongoing poor mental health outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童保护与婴儿期接受照料儿童的成长轨迹
在澳大利亚,婴儿接受家庭外照料的比率最高,而全世界接受照料的比率也在不断上升。我们之前的研究发现,婴儿期进入托养机构的儿童在发育方面具有高度脆弱性。本研究的目的是确定婴儿期进入托养机构的儿童的儿童保护和发展轨迹,以及通过提供服务满足发展需求是否能改善这些儿童的发展轨迹和结果。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,使用了新南威尔士州 "照料路径纵向研究"(Pathways of Care Longitudinal Study)的三波调查数据(2011-2016 年),其中包括标准化评估(年龄与阶段问卷、简明婴幼儿社会情感评估和儿童行为检查表)以及相关联的儿童保护和健康行政数据。我们的研究结果表明,婴儿时期进入保育系统的儿童主要留在保育系统中,他们在婴儿时期的发育非常脆弱。一大部分儿童的身体和认知发展轨迹良好,所提供的服务随着时间的推移不断增加;但是,需要尽早提供服务。另一个群体被确认为有早期社会情感问题,并显示出日益恶化的社会情感轨迹。对这一群体进行干预是减少持续不良心理健康后果风险的一个重要优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Abuse Review
Child Abuse Review Multiple-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Child Abuse Review provides a forum for all professionals working in the field of child protection, giving them access to the latest research findings, practice developments, training initiatives and policy issues. The Journal"s remit includes all forms of maltreatment, whether they occur inside or outside the family environment. Papers are written in a style appropriate for a multidisciplinary audience and those from outside Britain are welcomed. The Journal maintains a practice orientated focus and authors of research papers are encouraged to examine and discuss implications for practitioners.
期刊最新文献
An Investigation Into the Positive and Negative Outcomes for Clinicians Working With Child Survivors of Sexual Abuse Factors Related to Parents' Sensitivity to Violence Against Child in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study Issue Information Barnahus Is Coming: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of How Child Sexual Abuse Services at a Dublin Hospital Adapt and Respond Peer Victimization Among a Clinical Sample of Turkish Youth With Autism Spectrum Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1