Bead-by-bead normalization of single antigen assays: A necessary step for accurate detection of weak anti-HLA antibodies

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY European Journal of Immunology Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1002/eji.202451181
Cédric Usureau, Romain Lhotte, Magali Devriese, Jérémy Siemowski, Lionel Gabet, Véronique Letort, Jean-Luc Taupin
{"title":"Bead-by-bead normalization of single antigen assays: A necessary step for accurate detection of weak anti-HLA antibodies","authors":"Cédric Usureau,&nbsp;Romain Lhotte,&nbsp;Magali Devriese,&nbsp;Jérémy Siemowski,&nbsp;Lionel Gabet,&nbsp;Véronique Letort,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Taupin","doi":"10.1002/eji.202451181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ascertaining the presence of weakly positive anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in organ transplantation with multiplex single antigen beads assays may be challenging despite their high sensitivity due to technical variability issues. Through extensive datasets of Next-Generation Sequencing HLA typings and single antigen analyses, we reassessed the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) positivity threshold of the assay to enhance accuracy. By showing that some beads were more prone to false positivity than others, we propose a nuanced approach that accounts for nonspecific intrinsic reactivities at the HLA antigen level, that is, on a bead-by-bead basis, as it enhances assay precision and reliability. This is substantiated by a comprehensive statistical analysis of MFI values and the implementation of the determination of a “Quantile Adjusted Threshold 500” (QAT500) value for each bead. Applied to DSA detection during patients’ follow-up, this approach discriminated better and earlier low-strength DSA that would later raise their MFI above the clinically relevant threshold of 3000. Moving from a subjective interpretation to a more objective and precise methodology allows for standardizing HLA antibody and DSA detection. The study emphasizes the need for further research with real clinical data to validate and refine this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":165,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Immunology","volume":"54 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eji.202451181","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eji.202451181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ascertaining the presence of weakly positive anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in organ transplantation with multiplex single antigen beads assays may be challenging despite their high sensitivity due to technical variability issues. Through extensive datasets of Next-Generation Sequencing HLA typings and single antigen analyses, we reassessed the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) positivity threshold of the assay to enhance accuracy. By showing that some beads were more prone to false positivity than others, we propose a nuanced approach that accounts for nonspecific intrinsic reactivities at the HLA antigen level, that is, on a bead-by-bead basis, as it enhances assay precision and reliability. This is substantiated by a comprehensive statistical analysis of MFI values and the implementation of the determination of a “Quantile Adjusted Threshold 500” (QAT500) value for each bead. Applied to DSA detection during patients’ follow-up, this approach discriminated better and earlier low-strength DSA that would later raise their MFI above the clinically relevant threshold of 3000. Moving from a subjective interpretation to a more objective and precise methodology allows for standardizing HLA antibody and DSA detection. The study emphasizes the need for further research with real clinical data to validate and refine this approach.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单抗原检测的逐珠归一化:准确检测弱抗 HLA 抗体的必要步骤。
在器官移植中使用多重单抗原珠检测法确定抗-HLA供体特异性抗体(DSA)是否呈弱阳性,尽管其灵敏度很高,但由于技术变异性问题,这可能具有挑战性。通过大量的下一代测序 HLA 分型和单抗原分析数据集,我们重新评估了测定的平均荧光强度(MFI)阳性阈值,以提高准确性。通过证明某些珠子比其他珠子更容易出现假阳性,我们提出了一种细微的方法,即在HLA抗原水平上考虑非特异性的内在反应性,也就是逐珠考虑,因为它能提高检测的准确性和可靠性。通过对 MFI 值进行综合统计分析,并为每个微珠确定 "定量调整阈值 500"(QAT500)值,证明了这一点。这种方法适用于患者随访期间的 DSA 检测,能更好、更早地分辨低强度 DSA,这些低强度 DSA 随后会将其 MFI 提高到临床相关阈值 3000 以上。从主观解释到更客观、更精确的方法,可以实现 HLA 抗体和 DSA 检测的标准化。该研究强调,有必要利用真实的临床数据开展进一步研究,以验证和完善这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
224
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Immunology (EJI) is an official journal of EFIS. Established in 1971, EJI continues to serve the needs of the global immunology community covering basic, translational and clinical research, ranging from adaptive and innate immunity through to vaccines and immunotherapy, cancer, autoimmunity, allergy and more. Mechanistic insights and thought-provoking immunological findings are of interest, as are studies using the latest omics technologies. We offer fast track review for competitive situations, including recently scooped papers, format free submission, transparent and fair peer review and more as detailed in our policies.
期刊最新文献
Memory Phenotype Tfh Cells Develop Without Overt Infection and Support Germinal Center Formation and B Cell Responses to Viral Infection. Metabolic Reprogramming of Fibroblastic Reticular Cells in Immunity and Tolerance. Cytokine Autoantibodies Alter Gene Expression Profiles of Healthy Donors. Neural Crest-Derived Mesenchymal Cells Support Thymic Reconstitution After Lethal Irradiation. The Microbiome Modifies Manifestations of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Perforin-Deficient Mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1