Unraveling the complexity and instability of negative emotional eating: A latent transition analysis

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107657
{"title":"Unraveling the complexity and instability of negative emotional eating: A latent transition analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The manifestations of emotional eating are complicated, encompassing both over- and under-eating. However, little is understood about how emotional over- and under-eating constitute individuals' eating patterns and how these patterns change over time. Employing latent transition analysis, a longitudinal and person-centered approach, this study examined the patterns and stability of emotional eating. Over six months, 755 participants completed two waves of self-reported questionnaires. Results revealed four distinct latent profiles: <em>Low Emotional Eaters</em> (11.5–15.8%), <em>Emotional Eating-Undereaters</em> (31.1–40.5%), <em>Emotional Eating-Overeaters</em> (15.9–18.3%), and <em>Combined-Emotional Eaters</em> (29.7–37.2%). Approximately 50% of participants in each profile maintained their behavioral patterns over time, with transitions often shifting towards <em>Combined-Emotional Eaters</em>. Individuals in the profile of <em>Emotional Eating-Overeaters</em> exhibited the highest level of anxiety, depression, stress, and disordered eating. Gender, self-esteem level, and self-esteem instability were associated with profile membership and transition probabilities. These findings highlight the presence of distinct and relatively unstable patterns of negative emotional eating, indicating the potential distinction between trait and state emotional eating. Recognizing these inherent characteristics is crucial for future studies and intervention programs addressing negative emotional eating.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324004604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The manifestations of emotional eating are complicated, encompassing both over- and under-eating. However, little is understood about how emotional over- and under-eating constitute individuals' eating patterns and how these patterns change over time. Employing latent transition analysis, a longitudinal and person-centered approach, this study examined the patterns and stability of emotional eating. Over six months, 755 participants completed two waves of self-reported questionnaires. Results revealed four distinct latent profiles: Low Emotional Eaters (11.5–15.8%), Emotional Eating-Undereaters (31.1–40.5%), Emotional Eating-Overeaters (15.9–18.3%), and Combined-Emotional Eaters (29.7–37.2%). Approximately 50% of participants in each profile maintained their behavioral patterns over time, with transitions often shifting towards Combined-Emotional Eaters. Individuals in the profile of Emotional Eating-Overeaters exhibited the highest level of anxiety, depression, stress, and disordered eating. Gender, self-esteem level, and self-esteem instability were associated with profile membership and transition probabilities. These findings highlight the presence of distinct and relatively unstable patterns of negative emotional eating, indicating the potential distinction between trait and state emotional eating. Recognizing these inherent characteristics is crucial for future studies and intervention programs addressing negative emotional eating.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示消极情绪饮食的复杂性和不稳定性:潜在转变分析
情绪化进食的表现很复杂,既包括进食过量,也包括进食不足。然而,人们对情绪化过度进食和进食不足如何构成个人进食模式以及这些模式如何随时间变化知之甚少。本研究采用纵向和以人为本的方法--潜伏转变分析,对情绪化饮食的模式和稳定性进行了研究。在六个月的时间里,755 名参与者完成了两波自我报告问卷。结果显示了四种不同的潜在特征:低情绪进食者(11.5%-15.8%)、情绪进食-不进食者(31.1%-40.5%)、情绪进食-暴食者(15.9%-18.3%)和综合情绪进食者(29.7%-37.2%)。在每种特征中,约有 50%的参与者在一段时间内保持其行为模式,但往往会向综合情感型进食者过渡。情绪化进食-暴食者的焦虑、抑郁、压力和饮食紊乱程度最高。性别、自尊水平和自尊不稳定性与特征成员资格和过渡概率相关。这些发现凸显了消极情绪饮食的独特和相对不稳定的模式,表明了特质和状态情绪饮食之间的潜在区别。认识到这些固有特征对于未来针对消极情绪饮食的研究和干预计划至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A novel appetite loss in older adults with and without cognitive impairment (ALOC) screening scale. Beyond the family's cooking frequency: The Influence of Cooking Techniques on Vegetable and Fruit Consumption among the U.S. population. Sizzling steaks and manly molds: Exploring the meanings of meat and masculinities in young men's lives. The role of child nutrition counselling, gender dynamics, and intra-household feeding decision-making on child dietary diversity in semi-arid northern Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1