Perioperative Regional Anesthesia on Persistent Opioid Use and Chronic Pain after Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000006947
Connor G Pepper, John S Mikhaeil, James S Khan
{"title":"Perioperative Regional Anesthesia on Persistent Opioid Use and Chronic Pain after Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Connor G Pepper, John S Mikhaeil, James S Khan","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000006947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether regional anesthesia impacts the development of chronic postsurgical pain is currently debateable, and few studies have evaluated an effect on prolonged opioid use. We sought to systematically review the effect of regional anesthesia for adults undergoing noncardiac elective surgery on these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINHAL for randomized controlled trials (from inception to April 2022) of adult patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgeries that evaluated any regional technique and included one of our primary outcomes: (1) prolonged opioid use after surgery (continued opioid use ≥2 months postsurgery) and (2) chronic postsurgical pain (pain ≥3 months postsurgery). We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis on the specified outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach to rate the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven studies were included in the review. Pooled estimates indicated that regional anesthesia had a significant effect on reducing prolonged opioid use (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% CI, 0.24-0.96, P = .04, I 2 0%, 5 trials, n = 348 patients, GRADE low quality). Pooled estimates for chronic pain also indicated a significant effect favoring regional anesthesia at 3 (RR, 0.74, 95% CI, 0.59-0.93, P = .01, I 2 77%, 15 trials, n = 1489 patients, GRADE moderate quality) and 6 months (RR, 0.72, 95% CI, 0.61-0.85, P < .001, I 2 54%, 19 trials, n = 3457 patients, GRADE moderate quality) after surgery. No effect was found in the pooled analysis at 12 months postsurgery (RR, 0.44, 95% CI, 0.16-1.17, P = .10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that regional anesthesia potentially reduces chronic postsurgical pain up to 6 months after surgery. Our findings also suggest a potential decrease in the development of persistent opioid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether regional anesthesia impacts the development of chronic postsurgical pain is currently debateable, and few studies have evaluated an effect on prolonged opioid use. We sought to systematically review the effect of regional anesthesia for adults undergoing noncardiac elective surgery on these outcomes.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINHAL for randomized controlled trials (from inception to April 2022) of adult patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgeries that evaluated any regional technique and included one of our primary outcomes: (1) prolonged opioid use after surgery (continued opioid use ≥2 months postsurgery) and (2) chronic postsurgical pain (pain ≥3 months postsurgery). We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis on the specified outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach to rate the quality of evidence.

Results: Thirty-seven studies were included in the review. Pooled estimates indicated that regional anesthesia had a significant effect on reducing prolonged opioid use (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% CI, 0.24-0.96, P = .04, I 2 0%, 5 trials, n = 348 patients, GRADE low quality). Pooled estimates for chronic pain also indicated a significant effect favoring regional anesthesia at 3 (RR, 0.74, 95% CI, 0.59-0.93, P = .01, I 2 77%, 15 trials, n = 1489 patients, GRADE moderate quality) and 6 months (RR, 0.72, 95% CI, 0.61-0.85, P < .001, I 2 54%, 19 trials, n = 3457 patients, GRADE moderate quality) after surgery. No effect was found in the pooled analysis at 12 months postsurgery (RR, 0.44, 95% CI, 0.16-1.17, P = .10).

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that regional anesthesia potentially reduces chronic postsurgical pain up to 6 months after surgery. Our findings also suggest a potential decrease in the development of persistent opioid use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围手术期区域麻醉对非心脏手术后阿片类药物持续使用和慢性疼痛的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
背景:区域麻醉是否会影响术后慢性疼痛的发展目前尚存争议,很少有研究评估区域麻醉对阿片类药物长期使用的影响。我们试图对接受非心脏择期手术的成人进行区域麻醉对这些结果的影响进行系统回顾:我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和 CINHAL 中进行了系统检索,以寻找针对接受择期非心脏手术的成人患者的随机对照试验(从开始到 2022 年 4 月),这些试验评估了任何区域麻醉技术,并包括我们的主要结果之一:(1) 术后阿片类药物的长期使用(术后持续使用阿片类药物≥2 个月)和 (2) 术后慢性疼痛(术后疼痛≥3 个月)。我们对特定结果进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)对证据质量进行评级:结果:37 项研究被纳入综述。汇总估算结果显示,区域麻醉对减少阿片类药物的长期使用有显著效果(相对风险 [RR] 0.48,95% CI,0.24-0.96,P = .04,I2 0%,5 项试验,n = 348 名患者,GRADE 低质量)。术后 3 个月(RR,0.74,95% CI,0.59-0.93,P = .01,I2 77%,15 项试验,n = 1489 名患者,GRADE 中度质量)和 6 个月(RR,0.72,95% CI,0.61-0.85,P < .001,I2 54%,19 项试验,n = 3457 名患者,GRADE 中度质量)的慢性疼痛汇总估计值也表明区域麻醉具有显著疗效。在术后12个月的汇总分析中未发现任何影响(RR,0.44,95% CI,0.16-1.17,P = .10):本研究结果表明,区域麻醉有可能减轻手术后 6 个月内的慢性疼痛。我们的研究结果还表明,持续使用阿片类药物的情况可能会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
期刊最新文献
A Little Blue Butterfly. A Paradigm for Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Anesthesia Practice for Children with Autism for the Generalist Clinician. Association Between Two Muscle-Related Parameters and Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Tumor Resection Surgery. Cannabinoids and General Anesthetics: Revisiting Molecular Mechanisms of Their Pharmacological Interactions. Consensus Statement on Pain Management for Pregnant Patients with Opioid-Use Disorder from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1