Shangge Jiang, Dalia Othman, Laura Kathleen Langer, Mark Bayley, Christian Fortin, Amanda Mayo, Jordan Pelc, Lawrence R Robinson, Christine Soong, Meiqi Guo
{"title":"The Incidence and Nature of Adverse Events During Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Case Series.","authors":"Shangge Jiang, Dalia Othman, Laura Kathleen Langer, Mark Bayley, Christian Fortin, Amanda Mayo, Jordan Pelc, Lawrence R Robinson, Christine Soong, Meiqi Guo","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe and compare adverse event (AE) incidence, type, severity, and preventability in the Canadian inpatient rehabilitation setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this retrospective case series, AEs were identified through chart reviews from two Canadian academic tertiary post-acute care hospitals. AEs were characterized through descriptive statistics and compared using the Mantel-Haenszel and Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, one site (n = 120) had 28 AEs and an incidence of 9.7 (95% CI 6.1-13.3) per 1000 patient days, and the other (n = 48) had 15 AEs and an incidence of 13.9 (95% CI 6.9-21) per 1000 patient days (p = 0.82). The two sites differed significantly in AE type (p = 0.033) and preventability (p = 0.002) but not severity. The most common AE type was medication/intravenous fluids-related (16/28, 57%) at one site and patient incidents (e.g., falls, pressure ulcers) at the other. Four percent (1/28) of AEs were preventable at one site, and 53% (8/15) at another. Most AEs at both sites were mild in severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AEs significantly differed in type and preventability between the two sites. These results suggest the importance of context and the need for an organization-specific and tailored approach when addressing patient safety in inpatient rehabilitation settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To describe and compare adverse event (AE) incidence, type, severity, and preventability in the Canadian inpatient rehabilitation setting.
Design: In this retrospective case series, AEs were identified through chart reviews from two Canadian academic tertiary post-acute care hospitals. AEs were characterized through descriptive statistics and compared using the Mantel-Haenszel and Fisher's exact tests.
Results: During the study period, one site (n = 120) had 28 AEs and an incidence of 9.7 (95% CI 6.1-13.3) per 1000 patient days, and the other (n = 48) had 15 AEs and an incidence of 13.9 (95% CI 6.9-21) per 1000 patient days (p = 0.82). The two sites differed significantly in AE type (p = 0.033) and preventability (p = 0.002) but not severity. The most common AE type was medication/intravenous fluids-related (16/28, 57%) at one site and patient incidents (e.g., falls, pressure ulcers) at the other. Four percent (1/28) of AEs were preventable at one site, and 53% (8/15) at another. Most AEs at both sites were mild in severity.
Conclusions: AEs significantly differed in type and preventability between the two sites. These results suggest the importance of context and the need for an organization-specific and tailored approach when addressing patient safety in inpatient rehabilitation settings.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).