Incidence of hordeola and chalazia during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of mask wear.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Optometry Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1080/08164622.2024.2388125
Raman Bhakhri, Rebecca Zoltoski, Moheera Athar, Shaadan Hasan
{"title":"Incidence of hordeola and chalazia during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of mask wear.","authors":"Raman Bhakhri, Rebecca Zoltoski, Moheera Athar, Shaadan Hasan","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2024.2388125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Understanding the associations between mask wear and hordeola and chalazia formation are important for eyecare physicians as they may be overlooked as a direct cause. The literature on these possible relationships is limited.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The intention of this study was to determine if there was an increased incidence of internal/external hordeola and chalazia secondary to the implementation of mask wear due to the COVID-19 pandemic in an academic clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of electronic medical records at the Illinois Eye Institute was conducted. Cases were categorised into two groups: pre-COVID/pre- mask wear (December 2018-February 2020) and during the pandemic/mask wear (May 2020-July 2022). Demographic data were also compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 163 cases of hordeola and chalazia were reported pre-COVID, with an increase to 225 during the pandemic/mask wear period. Due to the reduction in patient visits because of COVID restrictions, an incidence analysis was conducted to determine occurrence rates per 1000 visits. The pre-COVID period showed a total incidence rate of 3.06 cases per 1000 patients (hordeola 1.6/chalazia 1.57) while during the mask wearing period the incidence rate increased to 6.32 cases per 1000 patients (hordeola 2.5/chalazions 3.82). A total incidence rate ratio was calculated to be 2.1 (hordeola 1.6/chalazia 2.6) correlating to a greater chance of developing the conditions during mask wear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An increase in the incidence of chalazia and hordeola were noted in the mask wear/pandemic group when compared to the pre-mask wear group. Increased mask wear may be a principal cause of hordeola and chalazia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"561-565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2024.2388125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical relevance: Understanding the associations between mask wear and hordeola and chalazia formation are important for eyecare physicians as they may be overlooked as a direct cause. The literature on these possible relationships is limited.

Background: The intention of this study was to determine if there was an increased incidence of internal/external hordeola and chalazia secondary to the implementation of mask wear due to the COVID-19 pandemic in an academic clinical setting.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of electronic medical records at the Illinois Eye Institute was conducted. Cases were categorised into two groups: pre-COVID/pre- mask wear (December 2018-February 2020) and during the pandemic/mask wear (May 2020-July 2022). Demographic data were also compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 163 cases of hordeola and chalazia were reported pre-COVID, with an increase to 225 during the pandemic/mask wear period. Due to the reduction in patient visits because of COVID restrictions, an incidence analysis was conducted to determine occurrence rates per 1000 visits. The pre-COVID period showed a total incidence rate of 3.06 cases per 1000 patients (hordeola 1.6/chalazia 1.57) while during the mask wearing period the incidence rate increased to 6.32 cases per 1000 patients (hordeola 2.5/chalazions 3.82). A total incidence rate ratio was calculated to be 2.1 (hordeola 1.6/chalazia 2.6) correlating to a greater chance of developing the conditions during mask wear.

Conclusions: An increase in the incidence of chalazia and hordeola were noted in the mask wear/pandemic group when compared to the pre-mask wear group. Increased mask wear may be a principal cause of hordeola and chalazia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间霍尔多拉病和查拉齐病的发病率:佩戴口罩的作用。
临床意义:了解戴口罩与角膜疣和霰粒肿形成之间的关系对眼科医生来说非常重要,因为它们可能被忽视为直接原因。有关这些可能关系的文献十分有限:本研究的目的是确定在学术临床环境中,由于 COVID-19 大流行而实施的口罩佩戴是否会导致内/外麦粒肿和霰粒肿的发病率增加:方法:对伊利诺伊眼科研究所的电子病历进行了回顾性病历审查。病例分为两组:COVID 前/佩戴口罩前(2018 年 12 月至 2020 年 2 月)和大流行期间/佩戴口罩(2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 7 月)。两组的人口统计学数据也进行了比较:COVID前共报告了163例霍乱和霰粒肿病例,在大流行/佩戴口罩期间增加到225例。由于 COVID 限制导致患者就诊次数减少,因此进行了发病率分析,以确定每 1000 次就诊的发病率。COVID 前的总发病率为每 1000 名患者 3.06 例(疱疹 1.6/皲裂 1.57),而在佩戴口罩期间,发病率增至每 1000 名患者 6.32 例(疱疹 2.5/皲裂 3.82)。计算得出的总发病率比为 2.1(霍尔多拉 1.6/霰粒肿 2.6),这与佩戴口罩期间发病几率更大有关:结论:与佩戴口罩前的组别相比,佩戴口罩/大流行组的霰粒肿和角化病发病率有所增加。口罩佩戴时间的增加可能是导致角化病和霰粒肿的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.
期刊最新文献
Translational changes: evidence around efficacy of red-light therapy in myopia management. Saccadic eye movements in amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Normative visual performance standards in male professional football players: a comprehensive assessment of visual acuity, binocular function, and visuo-cognitive abilities. Comparing conventional and 3D semi-automated lighting slit lamps for anterior segment examinations in a remote eye care setting. Improving eye care access for autistic people: applying the autistic SPACE framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1