Quantifying exercise intensity with fractal correlation properties of heart rate variability: a study on incremental and constant-speed running.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05592-2
C R van Rassel, O O Ajayi, K M Sales, C A Clermont, M Rummel, M J MacInnis
{"title":"Quantifying exercise intensity with fractal correlation properties of heart rate variability: a study on incremental and constant-speed running.","authors":"C R van Rassel, O O Ajayi, K M Sales, C A Clermont, M Rummel, M J MacInnis","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05592-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The short-term scaling exponent of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFAα1) applied to interbeat intervals may provide a method to identify ventilatory thresholds and indicate systemic perturbation during prolonged exercise. The purposes of this study were to (i) identify the gas exchange threshold (GET) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) using DFAα1 values of 0.75 and 0.5 from incremental exercise, (ii) compare DFAα1 thresholds with DFAα1 measures during constant-speed running near the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS), and (iii) assess the repeatability of DFAα1 between MLSS trials. Twelve runners performed an incremental running test and constant-speed running 5% below, at, and 5% above the MLSS, plus a repeat trial at MLSS. During 30-min running trials near MLSS, DFAα1 responses were variable (i.e., 0.27-1.24) and affected by intensity (p = 0.031) and duration (p = 0.003). No difference in DFAα1 was detected between MLSS trials (p = 0.597). In the early phase (~ 8 min), DFAα1 measures at MLSS (0.71 [0.13]) remained higher than the DFAα1 identified at RCP from the incremental test (0.57 [0.13]; p = 0.024). In addition, following ~ 18 min of constant speed running at MLSS, DFAα1 measures (0.64 [0.14]) remained higher than 0.5 (p = 0.011)-the value thought to demarcate the boundaries between heavy and severe exercise intensities. Accordingly, using fixed DFAα1 values associated with the RCP from incremental exercise to guide constant-speed exercise training may produce a greater than expected exercise intensity, however; the dependency of DFAα1 on intensity and duration suggest its potential utility to quantify systemic perturbations imposed by continuous exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05592-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The short-term scaling exponent of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFAα1) applied to interbeat intervals may provide a method to identify ventilatory thresholds and indicate systemic perturbation during prolonged exercise. The purposes of this study were to (i) identify the gas exchange threshold (GET) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) using DFAα1 values of 0.75 and 0.5 from incremental exercise, (ii) compare DFAα1 thresholds with DFAα1 measures during constant-speed running near the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS), and (iii) assess the repeatability of DFAα1 between MLSS trials. Twelve runners performed an incremental running test and constant-speed running 5% below, at, and 5% above the MLSS, plus a repeat trial at MLSS. During 30-min running trials near MLSS, DFAα1 responses were variable (i.e., 0.27-1.24) and affected by intensity (p = 0.031) and duration (p = 0.003). No difference in DFAα1 was detected between MLSS trials (p = 0.597). In the early phase (~ 8 min), DFAα1 measures at MLSS (0.71 [0.13]) remained higher than the DFAα1 identified at RCP from the incremental test (0.57 [0.13]; p = 0.024). In addition, following ~ 18 min of constant speed running at MLSS, DFAα1 measures (0.64 [0.14]) remained higher than 0.5 (p = 0.011)-the value thought to demarcate the boundaries between heavy and severe exercise intensities. Accordingly, using fixed DFAα1 values associated with the RCP from incremental exercise to guide constant-speed exercise training may produce a greater than expected exercise intensity, however; the dependency of DFAα1 on intensity and duration suggest its potential utility to quantify systemic perturbations imposed by continuous exercise.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用心率变异性的分形相关特性量化运动强度:对增量跑和匀速跑的研究。
将去趋势波动分析(DFAα1)的短期缩放指数应用于心跳间期,可提供一种方法来识别通气阈值,并显示长时间运动时的系统干扰。本研究的目的是:(i) 利用增量运动中 0.75 和 0.5 的 DFAα1 值确定气体交换阈值 (GET) 和呼吸补偿点 (RCP);(ii) 将 DFAα1 阈值与最大乳酸稳态 (MLSS) 附近匀速跑过程中的 DFAα1 测量值进行比较;(iii) 评估 MLSS 试验之间 DFAα1 的可重复性。12 名跑步者进行了增量跑测试和低于、处于和高于 MLSS 5%的匀速跑,以及在 MLSS 状态下的重复测试。在接近 MLSS 的 30 分钟跑步试验中,DFAα1 反应不稳定(即 0.27-1.24),并受强度(p = 0.031)和持续时间(p = 0.003)的影响。在 MLSS 试验之间未发现 DFAα1 的差异(p = 0.597)。在早期阶段(约 8 分钟),MLSS 的 DFAα1 测量值(0.71 [0.13])仍然高于增量测试中 RCP 的 DFAα1 测量值(0.57 [0.13];p = 0.024)。此外,在 MLSS 下进行约 18 分钟的匀速跑后,DFAα1 测量值(0.64 [0.14])仍高于 0.5(p = 0.011)--该值被认为是大运动强度和剧烈运动强度的分界线。因此,使用与增量运动 RCP 相关的固定 DFAα1 值来指导匀速运动训练,可能会产生比预期更大的运动强度;DFAα1 对运动强度和持续时间的依赖性表明,它在量化持续运动造成的系统扰动方面具有潜在的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1