Li Xian Simon Du, Gail Emily Edwards, Zohal Rashidzada, Harvey Newnham, Steve McGloughlin, Judit Orosz, Erica Y Tong
{"title":"Evaluation of Sepsis-Related Medical Emergency Team (MET) Calls with Pharmacist Involvement and Time to Antimicrobial Administration.","authors":"Li Xian Simon Du, Gail Emily Edwards, Zohal Rashidzada, Harvey Newnham, Steve McGloughlin, Judit Orosz, Erica Y Tong","doi":"10.1177/08850666241277507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the difference in proportion of patients receiving antimicrobials within one hour of sepsis recognition at sepsis-related Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls, without or with a sepsis-credentialed pharmacist. <b>Design:</b> Retrospective pre and post-intervention study. <b>Setting:</b> Single centre tertiary referral hospital. <b>Participants:</b> Patients admitted to the General Medicine Unit who had a sepsis-related MET call 24 hrs per day, and all other units from 17:00-08:00 hrs from August 2019 to Jan 2020 in the pre-intervention cohort and Aug 2020 to Jan 2021 for the post-intervention cohort. <b>Interventions:</b> Pharmacists attended MET calls to assist selection of antimicrobials, collaboratively prescribe with the medical officers, ensure supply, provide advice on dosing calculations, reconstitution, and administration. The pre-intervention cohort (Aug 2019-Jan 2020) did not have credentialed pharmacists' involvement at MET calls. <b>Outcome Measures:</b> Proportion of patients who received antimicrobials within one hours of MET call. <b>Results:</b> There were 97 sepsis-related MET calls in the pre-intervention cohort and 110 sepsis-related MET calls in the post-intervention cohort. A significantly higher proportion of patients received antimicrobials within one hour with pharmacist involvement, compared to control (81.3% vs 59.7%, <i>P</i> = .0006). A reduction in median time to antimicrobial administration (43 min vs 54 min, <i>P</i> = .017) was observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> Sepsis-related MET calls with pharmacist involvement experienced a greater proportion of patients receiving antimicrobials within one hour of sepsis recognition, and a reduction in median time to antimicrobial administration. These results provide support for routine pharmacist involvement at MET calls to assist patients receiving medications in a timely and efficient manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241277507"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241277507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the difference in proportion of patients receiving antimicrobials within one hour of sepsis recognition at sepsis-related Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls, without or with a sepsis-credentialed pharmacist. Design: Retrospective pre and post-intervention study. Setting: Single centre tertiary referral hospital. Participants: Patients admitted to the General Medicine Unit who had a sepsis-related MET call 24 hrs per day, and all other units from 17:00-08:00 hrs from August 2019 to Jan 2020 in the pre-intervention cohort and Aug 2020 to Jan 2021 for the post-intervention cohort. Interventions: Pharmacists attended MET calls to assist selection of antimicrobials, collaboratively prescribe with the medical officers, ensure supply, provide advice on dosing calculations, reconstitution, and administration. The pre-intervention cohort (Aug 2019-Jan 2020) did not have credentialed pharmacists' involvement at MET calls. Outcome Measures: Proportion of patients who received antimicrobials within one hours of MET call. Results: There were 97 sepsis-related MET calls in the pre-intervention cohort and 110 sepsis-related MET calls in the post-intervention cohort. A significantly higher proportion of patients received antimicrobials within one hour with pharmacist involvement, compared to control (81.3% vs 59.7%, P = .0006). A reduction in median time to antimicrobial administration (43 min vs 54 min, P = .017) was observed. Conclusion: Sepsis-related MET calls with pharmacist involvement experienced a greater proportion of patients receiving antimicrobials within one hour of sepsis recognition, and a reduction in median time to antimicrobial administration. These results provide support for routine pharmacist involvement at MET calls to assist patients receiving medications in a timely and efficient manner.
目的评估在没有脓毒症认证药剂师或有脓毒症认证药剂师的情况下,脓毒症相关医疗急救小组 (MET) 在确认脓毒症后一小时内接受抗菌药物治疗的患者比例差异。设计:干预前后的回顾性研究。地点:单中心三级转诊医院单中心三级转诊医院。参与者:2019年8月至2020年1月干预前队列和2020年8月至2021年1月干预后队列中每天24小时有脓毒症相关MET呼叫的普通内科病房住院患者,以及17:00-08:00期间所有其他病房的住院患者。干预措施:药剂师参加 MET 电话会议,协助选择抗菌药物,与医务人员合作开具处方,确保供应,并就剂量计算、复方和给药提供建议。干预前队列(2019 年 8 月至 2020 年 1 月)中没有经过认证的药剂师参与 MET 电话会议。结果测量:在 MET 呼叫后一小时内获得抗菌药物的患者比例。结果干预前队列中有 97 次与败血症相关的 MET 呼叫,干预后队列中有 110 次与败血症相关的 MET 呼叫。与对照组相比,有药剂师参与的患者在一小时内获得抗菌药物的比例明显更高(81.3% vs 59.7%,P = .0006)。抗菌药物给药的中位时间也有所缩短(43 分钟 vs 54 分钟,P = .017)。结论:在有药剂师参与的脓毒症相关 MET 呼叫中,脓毒症识别后一小时内接受抗菌药物治疗的患者比例更高,抗菌药物治疗的中位时间也有所缩短。这些结果支持药剂师在 MET 呼叫中的常规参与,以帮助患者及时、高效地接受药物治疗。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.