Linking the inner and outer mental representations of the body to social cognition skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108989
Silvia Canino , Valentina Torchia , Mariachiara Gaita , Simona Raimo , Liana Palermo
{"title":"Linking the inner and outer mental representations of the body to social cognition skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Silvia Canino ,&nbsp;Valentina Torchia ,&nbsp;Mariachiara Gaita ,&nbsp;Simona Raimo ,&nbsp;Liana Palermo","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An interesting interpretation of embodiment highlights the critical role of mental body representations (BR), including motor, somatosensory, and interoceptive formats, for social cognition. However, the nature of this relationship is still debated at the empirical level, with various studies arriving at different conclusions. Here, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize data from 3466 participants in 21 studies to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between inner and outer BR and social cognition. We focused on two core social cognition aspects: empathy and Theory of Mind (ToM). Concerning the inner BR, our meta-analytic findings reveal a significant correlation between specific interoceptive dimensions (i.e., interoceptive sensibility and accuracy) and social cognition, which was stronger for empathy than ToM. Conversely, although further research is needed, functional BR that mainly involve the outer body processing (i.e., nonaction-oriented BR) may show positive links with ToM. These findings point to specific interactions between BR and social cognition skills, supporting multi-faceted and embodied social cognition models. However, we also identified critical knowledge gaps and highlighted the need for further investigation to deepen our theoretical understanding of these relationships and their implications for clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 108989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224002045/pdfft?md5=2f34a0321305aa06710d21ec295d674e&pid=1-s2.0-S0028393224002045-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224002045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An interesting interpretation of embodiment highlights the critical role of mental body representations (BR), including motor, somatosensory, and interoceptive formats, for social cognition. However, the nature of this relationship is still debated at the empirical level, with various studies arriving at different conclusions. Here, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize data from 3466 participants in 21 studies to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between inner and outer BR and social cognition. We focused on two core social cognition aspects: empathy and Theory of Mind (ToM). Concerning the inner BR, our meta-analytic findings reveal a significant correlation between specific interoceptive dimensions (i.e., interoceptive sensibility and accuracy) and social cognition, which was stronger for empathy than ToM. Conversely, although further research is needed, functional BR that mainly involve the outer body processing (i.e., nonaction-oriented BR) may show positive links with ToM. These findings point to specific interactions between BR and social cognition skills, supporting multi-faceted and embodied social cognition models. However, we also identified critical knowledge gaps and highlighted the need for further investigation to deepen our theoretical understanding of these relationships and their implications for clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将身体的内在和外在心理表征与社会认知技能联系起来:系统回顾和元分析。
对 "体现"(embodiment)的一种有趣解释强调了心理身体表征(BR)对社会认知的关键作用,包括运动、躯体感觉和内感知形式。然而,这种关系的性质在实证层面仍存在争议,不同的研究得出了不同的结论。在此,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,旨在总结 21 项研究中 3466 名参与者的数据,从而更全面地了解内外部 BR 与社会认知之间的关系。我们重点研究了社会认知的两个核心方面:移情和心智理论(ToM)。关于内在 BR,我们的元分析结果显示,特定的内感知维度(即内感知的敏感性和准确性)与社会认知之间存在显著的相关性,其中移情的相关性强于心智理论。相反,虽然还需要进一步研究,但主要涉及身体外部处理的功能性 BR(即非行动导向 BR)可能与 ToM 有积极的联系。这些研究结果表明了BR与社会认知技能之间的特定互动关系,支持多方面的具身社会认知模型。不过,我们也发现了一些关键的知识空白,并强调了进一步研究的必要性,以加深我们对这些关系及其对临床实践的影响的理论理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal Correlates of Emotional Conflict Processing in Typically Developing Adolescents using Magnetoencephalography. Primary manipulation knowledge of objects is associated with the functional coupling of pMTG and aIPS Temporal dynamics of implicit moral evaluation: From empathy for pain to mentalizing processes Neuroimaging and perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A narrative review of research and future directions Working memory load increases movement-related alpha and beta desynchronization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1