Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING NeuroImage Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120831
{"title":"Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One driving factor for attention deployment towards a stimulus is its associated value due to previous experience and learning history. Previous visual search studies found that when looking for a target, distractors associated with higher reward produce more interference (e.g., longer response times). The present study investigated the neural mechanism of such value-driven attention deployment. Specifically, we were interested in which of the three attention sub-processes are responsible for the interference that was repeatedly observed behaviorally: enhancement of relevant information, attentional capture by irrelevant information, or suppression of irrelevant information. We replicated earlier findings showing longer response times and lower accuracy when a target competed with a high-reward compared to a low-reward distractor. We also found a spatial gradient of interference: behavioral performance dropped with increasing proximity to the target. This gradient was steeper for high- than low-reward distractors. Event-related potentials of the EEG signal showed the reason for the reward-induced attentional bias: High-reward distractors required more suppression than low-reward distractors as evident in larger Pd components. This effect was only found for distractors near targets, showing the additional filtering needs required for competing stimuli in close proximity. As a result, fewer attentional resources can be distributed to the target when it competes with a high-reward distractor, as evident in a smaller target-N2pc amplitude. The distractor-N2pc, indicative of attentional capture, was neither affected by distance nor reward, showing that attentional capture alone cannot explain interference by stimuli of high value. In sum our results show that the higher need for suppression of high-value stimuli contributes to reward-modulated attention deployment and increased suppression can prevent attentional capture of high-value stimuli.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811924003288/pdfft?md5=7bf93c288a88641c608d919ea257d5e5&pid=1-s2.0-S1053811924003288-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811924003288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One driving factor for attention deployment towards a stimulus is its associated value due to previous experience and learning history. Previous visual search studies found that when looking for a target, distractors associated with higher reward produce more interference (e.g., longer response times). The present study investigated the neural mechanism of such value-driven attention deployment. Specifically, we were interested in which of the three attention sub-processes are responsible for the interference that was repeatedly observed behaviorally: enhancement of relevant information, attentional capture by irrelevant information, or suppression of irrelevant information. We replicated earlier findings showing longer response times and lower accuracy when a target competed with a high-reward compared to a low-reward distractor. We also found a spatial gradient of interference: behavioral performance dropped with increasing proximity to the target. This gradient was steeper for high- than low-reward distractors. Event-related potentials of the EEG signal showed the reason for the reward-induced attentional bias: High-reward distractors required more suppression than low-reward distractors as evident in larger Pd components. This effect was only found for distractors near targets, showing the additional filtering needs required for competing stimuli in close proximity. As a result, fewer attentional resources can be distributed to the target when it competes with a high-reward distractor, as evident in a smaller target-N2pc amplitude. The distractor-N2pc, indicative of attentional capture, was neither affected by distance nor reward, showing that attentional capture alone cannot explain interference by stimuli of high value. In sum our results show that the higher need for suppression of high-value stimuli contributes to reward-modulated attention deployment and increased suppression can prevent attentional capture of high-value stimuli.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奖赏调节的注意力调配是由抑制而非注意力捕捉驱动的。
注意力向刺激物转移的一个驱动因素是刺激物因先前的经验和学习历史而产生的相关价值。以往的视觉搜索研究发现,在寻找目标时,与高回报相关的分心物会产生更多干扰(如反应时间更长)。本研究调查了这种由价值驱动的注意力调配的神经机制。具体来说,我们感兴趣的是,在行为学上反复观察到的干扰是由三种注意子过程中的哪一种引起的:相关信息的增强、无关信息的注意捕获或无关信息的抑制。我们重复了之前的研究结果,发现当目标与高回报的干扰物竞争时,反应时间更长,准确率更低,而与低回报的干扰物竞争时,反应时间更短,准确率更低。我们还发现了干扰的空间梯度:行为表现随目标距离的增加而下降。高回报干扰物的梯度比低回报干扰物的梯度更大。脑电信号的事件相关电位显示了奖赏引起的注意偏差的原因:高奖赏分心物比低奖赏分心物需要更多的抑制,这在较大的 Pd 分量中很明显。这种效应只出现在目标附近的分心物上,这表明对于近距离的竞争刺激需要额外的过滤。因此,当目标与高回报的分心物竞争时,分配给目标的注意资源就会减少,这表现在目标-N2pc 振幅较小。表明注意力捕获的分心物-N2pc 既不受距离影响,也不受奖励影响,这表明仅靠注意力捕获无法解释高价值刺激的干扰。总之,我们的研究结果表明,高价值刺激对抑制的需求较高,这有助于受奖励调节的注意调配,而抑制的增加可以防止对高价值刺激的注意捕获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing the role of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in cerebral small vessel disease: an integrative multi‑omics study. Sleep-spindles as a marker of attention and intelligence in dogs. Cerebral blood flow and arterial transit time responses to exercise training in older adults. Decoding Cortical Chronotopy - Comparing the Influence of Different Cortical Organizational Schemes. Neurophysiological dynamics of metacontrol states: EEG insights into conflict regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1