Evaluation of Pars Plana Vitrectomy With and Without Supplemental Scleral Buckle for the Repair of Rhegmatogenous Detachment Due to Inferior Retinal Breaks: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.3928/23258160-20240801-02
Eleanor R Lena, Nikhil S Patil, Marko M Popovic, Arshia Eshtiaghi, Arjan S Dhoot, Rajeev H Muni, Peter J Kertes
{"title":"Evaluation of Pars Plana Vitrectomy With and Without Supplemental Scleral Buckle for the Repair of Rhegmatogenous Detachment Due to Inferior Retinal Breaks: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Eleanor R Lena, Nikhil S Patil, Marko M Popovic, Arshia Eshtiaghi, Arjan S Dhoot, Rajeev H Muni, Peter J Kertes","doi":"10.3928/23258160-20240801-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this systematic review, the efficacy of scleral buckle (SB) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was compared to PPV alone in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) due to inferior retinal breaks (IRB). Measured outcomes included final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomic success, and complication rates in randomized controlled trials and observational studies from 2000 to 2022. Among four studies (696 eyes), three studies demonstrated no significant difference between PPV and PPV/SB for final BCVA, whereas one study reported better BCVA with added SB. PPV/SB yielded comparable single-surgery anatomical success (SSAS) and final anatomical success (FAS) in three studies relative to PPV alone (<i>P</i> < 0.05); however, one study reported better SSAS with added SB. Stratifying by lens status revealed a SSAS benefit with PPV/SB in phakic eyes (<i>P</i> = 0.046). No significant difference was seen in complication rates. In conclusion, PPV and PPV/SB were associated with similar functional outcomes and risk profile, whereas SSAS may be improved with PPV/SB in phakic eyes with RRD due to IRB. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2025;56:37-45.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":19679,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","volume":" ","pages":"37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240801-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this systematic review, the efficacy of scleral buckle (SB) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was compared to PPV alone in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) due to inferior retinal breaks (IRB). Measured outcomes included final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomic success, and complication rates in randomized controlled trials and observational studies from 2000 to 2022. Among four studies (696 eyes), three studies demonstrated no significant difference between PPV and PPV/SB for final BCVA, whereas one study reported better BCVA with added SB. PPV/SB yielded comparable single-surgery anatomical success (SSAS) and final anatomical success (FAS) in three studies relative to PPV alone (P < 0.05); however, one study reported better SSAS with added SB. Stratifying by lens status revealed a SSAS benefit with PPV/SB in phakic eyes (P = 0.046). No significant difference was seen in complication rates. In conclusion, PPV and PPV/SB were associated with similar functional outcomes and risk profile, whereas SSAS may be improved with PPV/SB in phakic eyes with RRD due to IRB. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2025;56:37-45.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估有无辅助巩膜扣带的玻璃体旁切除术,以修复因视网膜下部破损导致的风湿性脱离:系统回顾。
在这篇系统性综述中,我们比较了巩膜扣带术(SB)与单纯玻璃体旁切除术(PPV)对因视网膜下断裂(IRB)导致流变性视网膜脱离(RRD)的疗效。测量结果包括2000年至2022年随机对照试验和观察性研究中的最终最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、解剖成功率和并发症发生率。在四项研究(696 只眼)中,三项研究表明 PPV 和 PPV/SB 在最终 BCVA 方面没有显著差异,而一项研究报告称,增加 SB 后 BCVA 更好。在三项研究中,PPV/SB 的单次手术解剖成功率(SSAS)和最终解剖成功率(FAS)与单纯 PPV 相当(P < 0.05);但有一项研究报告称,添加 SB 后,单次手术解剖成功率(SSAS)更高。根据晶状体状态进行分层后发现,PPV/SB 在法晶体眼中具有 SSAS 优势(P = 0.046)。并发症发生率无明显差异。总之,PPV和PPV/SB具有相似的功能结果和风险特征,而对于因IRB导致RRD的法眼,PPV/SB可改善SSAS。[眼科手术激光成像视网膜2024;55:XX-XX]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: OSLI Retina focuses exclusively on retinal diseases, surgery and pharmacotherapy. OSLI Retina will offer an expedited submission to publication effort of peer-reviewed clinical science and case report articles. The front of the journal offers practical clinical and practice management features and columns specific to retina specialists. In sum, readers will find important peer-reviewed retina articles and the latest findings in techniques and science, as well as informative business and practice management features in one journal.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Metrics Between Eyes With Adult Onset Vitelliform Dystrophy, Age-related Macular Degeneration, and Healthy Controls. Long-term Outcomes of Faricimab in Previously Treated Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Macular, Choroidal, and Peripapillary Perfusion Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Angiography. Novel Management of a Vitreous Cyst Using Nd:YAG Ultra-Q Reflex Laser: A Case Report. Prognostic Value of Multimodal Imaging in Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Prospective Study from a North African Tertiary Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1