Please don't gayify!: an autoethnographic account of medicalised relationality for LGBTQI+ safe affirming medical health education and clinical practice.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1438906
Mark Vicars, Mickey Deppeler
{"title":"Please don't gayify!: an autoethnographic account of medicalised relationality for LGBTQI+ safe affirming medical health education and clinical practice.","authors":"Mark Vicars, Mickey Deppeler","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1438906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, the authors, a cis-gender gay man and an Indigenous non-binary, two-spirit person, narrate their past encounters with health professionals and their experiences pursuing allied health care training as students. Taking an autoethnographic approach, the first author re-narrates how medical practitioners and students engage (or fail to engage) with the LGBTQIA+ community. They draw on gray documentation derived from an interaction with a consulting physician that highlighted a telling lack of knowledge about the LGBTQ+ community, including those with diverse sex characteristics and sexualities/manifesting as unconscious bias. This interaction provided the impetus to speak back to the experience of being reduced to a medical prognosis. The second author questions the hegemonic practices underpinning encounters with the medical model of response in tertiary education. Our remit in this paper is to question how adequately the specific needs of the LGBTQI+ population are being addressed by the medical model and to what extent aspiring clinicians understand how their actions can contribute to gender- and sexuality-based discrimination and stigmatization.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1438906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, the authors, a cis-gender gay man and an Indigenous non-binary, two-spirit person, narrate their past encounters with health professionals and their experiences pursuing allied health care training as students. Taking an autoethnographic approach, the first author re-narrates how medical practitioners and students engage (or fail to engage) with the LGBTQIA+ community. They draw on gray documentation derived from an interaction with a consulting physician that highlighted a telling lack of knowledge about the LGBTQ+ community, including those with diverse sex characteristics and sexualities/manifesting as unconscious bias. This interaction provided the impetus to speak back to the experience of being reduced to a medical prognosis. The second author questions the hegemonic practices underpinning encounters with the medical model of response in tertiary education. Our remit in this paper is to question how adequately the specific needs of the LGBTQI+ population are being addressed by the medical model and to what extent aspiring clinicians understand how their actions can contribute to gender- and sexuality-based discrimination and stigmatization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
请不要同性恋化!:关于 LGBTQI+ 安全平权医学健康教育和临床实践的医疗化关系的自述。
在这篇文章中,作者--一名顺性别同性恋者和一名土著非二元双灵者--讲述了他们过去与医疗专业人员的接触,以及他们作为学生接受联合医疗培训的经历。第一位作者采用自述方法,重新叙述了医疗从业者和学生如何与 LGBTQIA+ 群体接触(或未能接触)。他们从与一名咨询医生的互动中获得了灰色文献,该互动凸显了他们对 LGBTQ+ 群体(包括具有不同性特征和性取向的群体)缺乏了解/表现为无意识的偏见。这次交流为我们提供了动力,让我们回过头来谈谈被简化为医学预后的经历。第二位作者对在高等教育中以医学模式应对的霸权做法提出了质疑。我们在本文中的职责是质疑医学模式在多大程度上满足了 LGBTQI+ 群体的特殊需求,以及有抱负的临床医生在多大程度上了解他们的行为会助长基于性别和性取向的歧视与污名化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating policies and regulations used to control corruption among accounting officers in the public sector of South Africa: a systematic literature review. Who is the next leader? Understanding women leadership development and succession planning in Saudi Arabian higher educational institutions. Communicating international politics narratives of security, democracy and human rights in contemporary society: indexing and analysis using online monitoring data. On the brink of social resistance: local community perceptions of mining company operating permits in East Luwu, Indonesia. COVID-19, social media, algorithms and the rise of indigenous movements in Southern Africa: perspectives from activists, audiences and policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1