A longitudinal examination of the psychometric properties of the English perceived stress scale- four (PSS-4) in mental health counsellors using item response theory.

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Stress and Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1002/smi.3468
Ryan M Cook, Stefanie A Wind, Heather J Fye
{"title":"A longitudinal examination of the psychometric properties of the English perceived stress scale- four (PSS-4) in mental health counsellors using item response theory.","authors":"Ryan M Cook, Stefanie A Wind, Heather J Fye","doi":"10.1002/smi.3468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the longitudinal psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale - 4 items version (PSS-4) using item response theory with a sample of 361 mental health counsellors. Participants completed the PSS-4 at three timepoints at six-month intervals in a one-year period. There were 290 participants who (80.3%) identified as female, 51 (14.1%) identified as male, eight (2.2%) identified as gender variant/non-conforming, seven (1.9%) wrote in their own gender identity (e.g., genderqueer, gender expansive), three (0.8%) identified as Transgender male, and two (0.6%) did not respond to the item. The racial and ethnic backgrounds were as follows: White (87.3%), Multiracial (5.5%), Latino or Hispanic or Spanish (2.8%), Black or African American (1.4%), Asian (0.8%), Middle Eastern (0.8%), and five did not respond to the item (1.4%). We found unidimensionality evidence of the PSS-4 across all three timepoints and response categories were monotonically ordered. We also found that across all timepoints, the average person location was lower than the average item location, suggesting that the PSS-4 may not be well-targeted for this sample of mental health counsellors. We observed no significant interactions between timepoints, hours worked per week, and length of employment. Implications of the findings, including a discussion of the utility of the PSS-4 as a global measure of stress and with mental health counsellors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":" ","pages":"e3468"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined the longitudinal psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale - 4 items version (PSS-4) using item response theory with a sample of 361 mental health counsellors. Participants completed the PSS-4 at three timepoints at six-month intervals in a one-year period. There were 290 participants who (80.3%) identified as female, 51 (14.1%) identified as male, eight (2.2%) identified as gender variant/non-conforming, seven (1.9%) wrote in their own gender identity (e.g., genderqueer, gender expansive), three (0.8%) identified as Transgender male, and two (0.6%) did not respond to the item. The racial and ethnic backgrounds were as follows: White (87.3%), Multiracial (5.5%), Latino or Hispanic or Spanish (2.8%), Black or African American (1.4%), Asian (0.8%), Middle Eastern (0.8%), and five did not respond to the item (1.4%). We found unidimensionality evidence of the PSS-4 across all three timepoints and response categories were monotonically ordered. We also found that across all timepoints, the average person location was lower than the average item location, suggesting that the PSS-4 may not be well-targeted for this sample of mental health counsellors. We observed no significant interactions between timepoints, hours worked per week, and length of employment. Implications of the findings, including a discussion of the utility of the PSS-4 as a global measure of stress and with mental health counsellors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用项目反应理论对心理健康顾问的英语压力感量表四(PSS-4)的心理测量特性进行纵向研究。
我们以 361 名心理健康辅导员为样本,采用项目反应理论研究了感知压力量表--4 个项目版(PSS-4)的纵向心理测量特性。参与者在一年时间内,每隔六个月在三个时间点完成了 PSS-4。有 290 名参与者(80.3%)被认定为女性,51 名(14.1%)被认定为男性,8 名(2.2%)被认定为性别变异者/不符合性别者,7 名(1.9%)写入了自己的性别认同(例如,变性者、性别扩展),3 名(0.8%)被认定为跨性别男性,2 名(0.6%)未对该项目做出回应。种族和民族背景如下:白人(87.3%)、多种族(5.5%)、拉美裔或西班牙裔或西班牙语(2.8%)、黑人或非裔美国人(1.4%)、亚裔(0.8%)、中东裔(0.8%)和五人未对该项目做出回应(1.4%)。我们发现,在所有三个时间点上,PSS-4 都具有单维性,而且回答类别是单调有序的。我们还发现,在所有时间点上,个人的平均位置都低于项目的平均位置,这表明 PSS-4 可能无法很好地针对这一心理健康辅导员样本。我们没有观察到时间点、每周工作时数和工作年限之间存在明显的交互作用。研究结果的意义,包括讨论 PSS-4 作为压力的总体测量方法对心理健康顾问的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
期刊最新文献
Destructive Self-Leadership? Self-Leadership, Maladaptive Coping, and Stress in College Students. Global Research on Cyberchondria: Scientometric and Visual Analysis From 2003 to 2022. Psychological Distress, Resources, and Coping Strategies Among Evacuees and Non-Evacuees From an Armed Conflict Zone: A Network Analysis. Reflective Abstract Processing Reduces Negative Emotions Independent of Self-Perspective. The Impact of Physical Activity on the Disability-Related Stress of Individuals With Physical Disabilities: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1