Level, Motivation and Barriers to Participate in Physical Activity among Geriatric Population at Ahmedabad City, India: An Epidemiological Factsheet.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-05 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.5770/cgj.27.751
Viral R Dave, Neel B Desai, Vasu Rathod
{"title":"Level, Motivation and Barriers to Participate in Physical Activity among Geriatric Population at Ahmedabad City, India: An Epidemiological Factsheet.","authors":"Viral R Dave, Neel B Desai, Vasu Rathod","doi":"10.5770/cgj.27.751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the level of physical activity among geriatric population, to determine the motivating factors for being active and identifying barriers that prevent participants from engaging in physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out at one of the wards within Ahmedabad city following multi-stage random sampling. The calculated sample size was 230. A pre-designed, validated, short version International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and Behaviour Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-3) were used for data collection by personal interview. From selected sampling-frame, geriatric people residing in every 5th household were interviewed after obtaining oral informed consent following simple-random sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of total 230 study participants, 67 (29.13%) were physically active (cumulative for Category 2 and Category 3), while the remaining 163 (70.87%) were found physically inactive (i.e., minimally active [Category 1]). Motivational scores, particularly in identified regulation, showed higher median scores across subdomains of the BREQ-3. Amotivation exhibited a strong negative correlation with physical activity, while intrinsic regulation displayed a strong positive correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than two-third of study participants were physically inactive. Level of educational status, type of previous occupation involved, presence of addiction, BMI, electronic device usage duration per day and presence of chronic illness were statistically significant determinants to decide involvement of elderly people in category of physical activity. Amotivation, external and introjected regulation had negative correlation with physical activity, while intrinsic regulation and RAI (Relative Autonomy Index) showed positive correlation with physical activity. None of the behavioural regulators had statistically significant association with category of physical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"27 3","pages":"299-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.27.751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the level of physical activity among geriatric population, to determine the motivating factors for being active and identifying barriers that prevent participants from engaging in physical activity.

Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out at one of the wards within Ahmedabad city following multi-stage random sampling. The calculated sample size was 230. A pre-designed, validated, short version International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and Behaviour Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-3) were used for data collection by personal interview. From selected sampling-frame, geriatric people residing in every 5th household were interviewed after obtaining oral informed consent following simple-random sampling.

Results: Of total 230 study participants, 67 (29.13%) were physically active (cumulative for Category 2 and Category 3), while the remaining 163 (70.87%) were found physically inactive (i.e., minimally active [Category 1]). Motivational scores, particularly in identified regulation, showed higher median scores across subdomains of the BREQ-3. Amotivation exhibited a strong negative correlation with physical activity, while intrinsic regulation displayed a strong positive correlation.

Conclusion: More than two-third of study participants were physically inactive. Level of educational status, type of previous occupation involved, presence of addiction, BMI, electronic device usage duration per day and presence of chronic illness were statistically significant determinants to decide involvement of elderly people in category of physical activity. Amotivation, external and introjected regulation had negative correlation with physical activity, while intrinsic regulation and RAI (Relative Autonomy Index) showed positive correlation with physical activity. None of the behavioural regulators had statistically significant association with category of physical activity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度艾哈迈达巴德市老年人参加体育活动的水平、动机和障碍:流行病学概况介绍。
目的估计老年人群的体育锻炼水平,确定参加体育锻炼的动机因素,并找出阻碍参与者参加体育锻炼的障碍:通过多阶段随机抽样,在艾哈迈达巴德市的一个病房开展了一项基于社区的横断面研究。计算得出的样本量为 230 人。采用预先设计、经过验证的简短版国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ)和运动行为调节问卷(BREQ-3),通过个人访谈收集数据。从选定的抽样范围中,每 5 个家庭中就有一位老人,在获得口头知情同意后,研究人员通过简单随机抽样对他们进行了访谈:在总共 230 名研究参与者中,67 人(29.13%)身体活动量大(第 2 类和第 3 类累计),其余 163 人(70.87%)身体活动量小(即活动量小[第 1 类])。在 BREQ-3 的各个子域中,动机得分,尤其是识别调节方面的动机得分显示出较高的中位数。动机与身体活动呈强烈的负相关,而内在调节则呈强烈的正相关:结论:超过三分之二的研究参与者缺乏体育锻炼。受教育程度、以前从事的职业类型、是否上瘾、体重指数、每天使用电子设备的时间以及是否患有慢性病,这些因素在统计学上对老年人是否参与体育锻炼有显著的决定作用。动机、外在和内在调节与体育锻炼呈负相关,而内在调节和 RAI(相对自主指数)与体育锻炼呈正相关。没有一种行为调节方式与体育活动类别有显著的统计学关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
期刊最新文献
"How Can We Help You?" Older Adults' and Care Partners' Perspectives on Improving Care in Hospital: A Mixed Methods Study. Alternate Level of Care Patients in Canada: a Scoping Review. Balancing Patients' Eating Habits with Planetary Health-Pilot Study to Decrease Food Waste with Vegetarian Lunches using a Quality Improvement Approach. Canadian Clinical Guidelines on Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults. Determinants of First Practice Location among Canadian Geriatric Medicine Trainees and Recent Graduates: Findings of a Cross-sectional Survey in 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1