Urogenital Infections Among Women Attending Mwingi Hospital, Kitui County, Kenya: Safeguarding Antibiotics Through Microbiological Diagnosis.

The East African health research journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.24248/eahrj.v8i1.754
Christine Musungi Mbuvi, Boniface Nzioki Musila, Anthony Kebira Nyamache
{"title":"Urogenital Infections Among Women Attending Mwingi Hospital, Kitui County, Kenya: Safeguarding Antibiotics Through Microbiological Diagnosis.","authors":"Christine Musungi Mbuvi, Boniface Nzioki Musila, Anthony Kebira Nyamache","doi":"10.24248/eahrj.v8i1.754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urogenital infections pose a considerable public health threat, as almost half of women will experience urinary and reproductive system infections at some point in their lives. However, the urogenital infection burden is often not clear in some regions. Nevertheless, the misuse of antimicrobial agents, including self-prescription, has increased widespread antimicrobial resistance, limiting treatment benefits. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the various urogenital infections, associated risk factors, and profile the bacterial isolates, and assess their antibiotic resistance among women attending Mwingi Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 322 women aged between the ages of 15 to 44 years. Urine and high vaginal swabs were collected from all participants and analyzed within 6 hours. Microscopic examination on wet mounts was done, bacterial isolation was done and those with significant growth were confirmed and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing using specific media. Descriptive statistics were used in expressing the infection frequencies and antimicrobial resistance. Odds ratios were used to determine the risk of urogenital infection. The level of significance was considered at a P value of less than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 322 women, 45.3% (146) had a urogenital infection, with bacteria being the primary cause (26.4%). The infections included UTI (22.7%), <i>Candidiasis</i> (15.2%), <i>Trichomoniasis</i> (3.7%), <i>Gonorrhea</i> (2.5%), and <i>Bacterial vaginitis</i> (1.2%). Antibiotic use was 32.9%, with only 2.8% receiving a microbiological diagnosis before antibiotic use. The overall antibiotic resistance was 53%, with the lowest resistance observed against penicillin and combinations (31.4%) and 3rd Cephalosporins (39.4%). The highest resistance was observed against nalidixic acid (74.8%) and cotrimoxazole (62.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women attending Mwingi Hospital are commonly affected by various urogenital infections. Antibiotic use without microbiological diagnosis was observed. Among the antibiotics tested, 3<sup>rd</sup> generation cephalosporins and penicillin combination agents were noted as the most effective in treating bacterial urogenital infections, while nalidixic acid and cotrimoxazole were ineffective. Improved diagnosis and targeted treatments are necessary to prevent further development of antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":74991,"journal":{"name":"The East African health research journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The East African health research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24248/eahrj.v8i1.754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urogenital infections pose a considerable public health threat, as almost half of women will experience urinary and reproductive system infections at some point in their lives. However, the urogenital infection burden is often not clear in some regions. Nevertheless, the misuse of antimicrobial agents, including self-prescription, has increased widespread antimicrobial resistance, limiting treatment benefits. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the various urogenital infections, associated risk factors, and profile the bacterial isolates, and assess their antibiotic resistance among women attending Mwingi Hospital.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 322 women aged between the ages of 15 to 44 years. Urine and high vaginal swabs were collected from all participants and analyzed within 6 hours. Microscopic examination on wet mounts was done, bacterial isolation was done and those with significant growth were confirmed and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing using specific media. Descriptive statistics were used in expressing the infection frequencies and antimicrobial resistance. Odds ratios were used to determine the risk of urogenital infection. The level of significance was considered at a P value of less than 0.05.

Results: Among the 322 women, 45.3% (146) had a urogenital infection, with bacteria being the primary cause (26.4%). The infections included UTI (22.7%), Candidiasis (15.2%), Trichomoniasis (3.7%), Gonorrhea (2.5%), and Bacterial vaginitis (1.2%). Antibiotic use was 32.9%, with only 2.8% receiving a microbiological diagnosis before antibiotic use. The overall antibiotic resistance was 53%, with the lowest resistance observed against penicillin and combinations (31.4%) and 3rd Cephalosporins (39.4%). The highest resistance was observed against nalidixic acid (74.8%) and cotrimoxazole (62.6%).

Conclusion: Women attending Mwingi Hospital are commonly affected by various urogenital infections. Antibiotic use without microbiological diagnosis was observed. Among the antibiotics tested, 3rd generation cephalosporins and penicillin combination agents were noted as the most effective in treating bacterial urogenital infections, while nalidixic acid and cotrimoxazole were ineffective. Improved diagnosis and targeted treatments are necessary to prevent further development of antibiotic resistance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚基图伊县 Mwingi 医院就诊妇女的泌尿生殖系统感染:通过微生物诊断保护抗生素。
背景:泌尿生殖系统感染对公共卫生构成了相当大的威胁,因为几乎一半的女性在一生中都会经历泌尿和生殖系统感染。然而,在一些地区,泌尿生殖系统感染的负担往往并不明确。然而,抗菌药的滥用,包括自行开药,增加了抗菌药耐药性的普遍性,限制了治疗效果。因此,本研究旨在确定各种泌尿生殖系统感染、相关风险因素、细菌分离概况,并评估在 Mwingi 医院就诊的妇女对抗生素的耐药性:方法:对 322 名年龄在 15 至 44 岁之间的女性进行了横断面研究。研究人员收集了所有参与者的尿液和阴道拭子,并在 6 小时内进行了分析。对湿拭子进行显微镜检查,进行细菌分离,对有明显生长的细菌进行确认,并使用特定培养基进行抗菌药敏感性测试。描述性统计用于表示感染频率和抗菌药耐药性。用比值比来确定泌尿生殖系统感染的风险。显著性水平以 P 值小于 0.05 为准:在 322 名妇女中,45.3%(146 人)患有泌尿生殖系统感染,细菌是主要原因(26.4%)。感染包括尿道炎(22.7%)、念珠菌病(15.2%)、滴虫病(3.7%)、淋病(2.5%)和细菌性阴道炎(1.2%)。使用抗生素的比例为 32.9%,其中只有 2.8%在使用抗生素前接受了微生物学诊断。总体抗生素耐药性为 53%,耐药性最低的是青霉素及其复方制剂(31.4%)和第三代头孢菌素(39.4%)。耐药性最高的是萘啶酸(74.8%)和复方新诺明(62.6%):结论:在 Mwingi 医院就诊的妇女通常会受到各种泌尿生殖系统感染的影响。结论:在 Mwingi 医院就诊的妇女通常会受到各种泌尿生殖系统感染的影响。在测试的抗生素中,第三代头孢菌素和青霉素类复方制剂被认为是治疗泌尿生殖系统细菌感染最有效的药物,而萘啶酸和复方新诺明则无效。为防止抗生素耐药性的进一步发展,有必要改进诊断和有针对性的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adherence to Lifestyle Recommendations among Adults Attending Hypertension Clinics in Selected Hospitals in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice on Schistosomiasis in Pujini Shehia, Pemba Island, Tanzania: A Blueprint for Planning Community-based Interventions. Community Perceptions on Health Conditions Related to Indoor Air Pollution Among Adults Living in Urban Informal Settlements in Mwanza City, Tanzania. Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Health Workers and General Public in Tanzania. Experiences and Challenges of Mothers in Caring for Infants with Delayed Developmental Milestones: A Case of Dodoma Region, Tanzania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1