Self-reported follow-up care needs can be met in both facility and self-managed abortion: Evidence from low- and middle-income countries.

Laura E Jacobson, Ruvani Jayaweera, Katy Footman, Julia M Goodman, Caitlin Gerdts, Blair G Darney
{"title":"Self-reported follow-up care needs can be met in both facility and self-managed abortion: Evidence from low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Laura E Jacobson, Ruvani Jayaweera, Katy Footman, Julia M Goodman, Caitlin Gerdts, Blair G Darney","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand in-facility follow-up care-seeking behavior among both people who self-managed medication abortions and those who obtained facility-managed care in low-and-middle-income countries. We explore factors that contribute to meeting individual self-reported follow-up care needs, core to person-centered care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a qualitative, codebook thematic analysis of 67 in-depth interviews conducted with people who self-managed medication abortions or obtained facility-managed medication abortion care. We first classified individuals as having their follow-up care needs met (not seeking care when the participant felt confident that additional care was not warranted or desired or receiving care if it was desired) or not. Our a priori analytic domains came from the Anderson model of health services utilization - predisposing, enabling, or need factors (perceived and evaluated need for health services) that contributed to having follow-up care needs met or not. We also describe emergent themes within each domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (n=59, 88%) had their follow-up care needs met; half (n=33, 49%) sought follow-up care in a facility. Prior birth or abortion experiences emerged as predisposing factors for having follow-up care needs met. Having accompaniment support (from activists or hotlines who provide abortion guidance outside of clinical settings), knowing what to expect, and information sources were key enabling factors for having follow-up care needs met. Need factors included flexible follow-up care guidelines. Those who did not have their follow-up care needs met described predisposing negative health system experiences; enabling factors including health system challenges, stigma from providers, and legal risk; and need factors of required follow-up care guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medication abortion follow-up care experiences are diverse, and individual needs can be met both in and outside of health facilities. Understanding prior experiences, enabling accompaniment support, and considering flexible follow-up care guidelines can support meeting individual follow-up care needs, which is essential to person-centered abortion care.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Follow-up care needs, essential to ensuring access to high-quality abortion services, can be met in both self-managed and in-facility medication abortion models. Policies that require follow-up care when it is not needed or desired by the person can reinforce ideas that self-managed abortion is not safe or effective, despite existing evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To understand in-facility follow-up care-seeking behavior among both people who self-managed medication abortions and those who obtained facility-managed care in low-and-middle-income countries. We explore factors that contribute to meeting individual self-reported follow-up care needs, core to person-centered care.

Study design: We conducted a qualitative, codebook thematic analysis of 67 in-depth interviews conducted with people who self-managed medication abortions or obtained facility-managed medication abortion care. We first classified individuals as having their follow-up care needs met (not seeking care when the participant felt confident that additional care was not warranted or desired or receiving care if it was desired) or not. Our a priori analytic domains came from the Anderson model of health services utilization - predisposing, enabling, or need factors (perceived and evaluated need for health services) that contributed to having follow-up care needs met or not. We also describe emergent themes within each domain.

Results: Most participants (n=59, 88%) had their follow-up care needs met; half (n=33, 49%) sought follow-up care in a facility. Prior birth or abortion experiences emerged as predisposing factors for having follow-up care needs met. Having accompaniment support (from activists or hotlines who provide abortion guidance outside of clinical settings), knowing what to expect, and information sources were key enabling factors for having follow-up care needs met. Need factors included flexible follow-up care guidelines. Those who did not have their follow-up care needs met described predisposing negative health system experiences; enabling factors including health system challenges, stigma from providers, and legal risk; and need factors of required follow-up care guidelines.

Conclusions: Medication abortion follow-up care experiences are diverse, and individual needs can be met both in and outside of health facilities. Understanding prior experiences, enabling accompaniment support, and considering flexible follow-up care guidelines can support meeting individual follow-up care needs, which is essential to person-centered abortion care.

Implications: Follow-up care needs, essential to ensuring access to high-quality abortion services, can be met in both self-managed and in-facility medication abortion models. Policies that require follow-up care when it is not needed or desired by the person can reinforce ideas that self-managed abortion is not safe or effective, despite existing evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗机构和自我管理的人工流产都能满足自我报告的后续护理需求:来自中低收入国家的证据。
目的:了解中低收入国家自我管理药物流产者和获得机构管理护理者寻求机构内后续护理的行为。我们探讨了有助于满足个人自我报告的后续护理需求的因素,这些因素是以人为本的护理的核心:研究设计:我们对 67 个深度访谈进行了定性、代码主题分析,访谈对象为自行管理药物流产或获得机构管理药物流产护理的患者。我们首先将受访者的后续护理需求分为得到满足和未得到满足(当受访者确信没有必要或不需要额外护理时不寻求护理,或在需要护理时接受护理)。我们的先验分析领域来自安德森医疗服务利用模型--导致后续护理需求是否得到满足的先决条件、有利因素或需求因素(对医疗服务需求的感知和评估)。我们还描述了每个领域中出现的主题:大多数参与者(人数=59,88%)的后续护理需求得到了满足;半数参与者(人数=33,49%)在医疗机构寻求后续护理。之前的生育或堕胎经历是满足后续护理需求的诱因。获得陪伴支持(来自在临床环境外提供堕胎指导的积极分子或热线)、了解预期情况以及信息来源是满足后续护理需求的关键有利因素。需要因素包括灵活的后续护理指南。那些后续护理需求未得到满足的人描述了他们在医疗系统中的负面经历;有利因素包括医疗系统的挑战、来自医疗服务提供者的羞辱以及法律风险;需求因素包括所需的后续护理指南:结论:药物流产后续护理经历多种多样,医疗机构内外均可满足个人需求。了解先前的经历、提供陪伴支持以及考虑灵活的后续护理指南可帮助满足个人的后续护理需求,这对于以人为本的人工流产护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation. Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study. Ongoing contraceptive goals of patients who did not achieve desired postpartum permanent contraception prior to hospital discharge. The association of insertion methods on immediate postpartum intrauterine device expulsion rates: A retrospective cohort study. Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: Strategies and considerations for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1