The feasibility of carotid evaluation by resident radiologists to expand access to ultrasound services.

Jia Liu, Mei Liao, Hui Zhang, Jie Ren
{"title":"The feasibility of carotid evaluation by resident radiologists to expand access to ultrasound services.","authors":"Jia Liu, Mei Liao, Hui Zhang, Jie Ren","doi":"10.11152/mu-4434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of our study was to determine resident radiologists' accuracy in diagnosing carotid atherosclerotic plaque and to assess any factors leading to incorrect findings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The results of preliminary carotid scanning performed by radiology residents from December 1, 2021, to August 1, 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. These scans received an instant review by experts. The discrepancy rates of the resident radiologists were evaluated using expert diagnoses. Then, the plaque detection rate of the resident radiologists was investigated for different plaque characteristics. The causes of incorrect stenosis diagnoses were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the investigation of carotid plaque detection, a total of 274 carotid scans from 137 patients were evaluated in our hospital. The overall agreement rate of plaque detection was 90.9%. Echolucent plaques, plaques in the lateral or near wall, and plaques in the carotid bulbs were more likely to be misdiagnosed by resident radiologists. A total of 325 plaques were included in the investigation of carotid artery stenosis classification. The overall agreement rate of stenosis evaluation was 67.7%. The misclassification of moderate stenosis was greater than that of mild and severe stenosis (p=0.0003). The sensitivity was as low as 55.56%. Nonstandard sonographic techniques and incorrect application of interpretive criteria were two main causes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resident radiologists could accurately and efficiently detect carotid plaques. Scanning by resident radiologists can expand access to ultrasound services. Only the diagnosis of moderate stenosis by resident radiologists was not satisfactory and may require a specialized review from experienced radiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":94138,"journal":{"name":"Medical ultrasonography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of our study was to determine resident radiologists' accuracy in diagnosing carotid atherosclerotic plaque and to assess any factors leading to incorrect findings.

Materials and methods: The results of preliminary carotid scanning performed by radiology residents from December 1, 2021, to August 1, 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. These scans received an instant review by experts. The discrepancy rates of the resident radiologists were evaluated using expert diagnoses. Then, the plaque detection rate of the resident radiologists was investigated for different plaque characteristics. The causes of incorrect stenosis diagnoses were analyzed.

Results: In the investigation of carotid plaque detection, a total of 274 carotid scans from 137 patients were evaluated in our hospital. The overall agreement rate of plaque detection was 90.9%. Echolucent plaques, plaques in the lateral or near wall, and plaques in the carotid bulbs were more likely to be misdiagnosed by resident radiologists. A total of 325 plaques were included in the investigation of carotid artery stenosis classification. The overall agreement rate of stenosis evaluation was 67.7%. The misclassification of moderate stenosis was greater than that of mild and severe stenosis (p=0.0003). The sensitivity was as low as 55.56%. Nonstandard sonographic techniques and incorrect application of interpretive criteria were two main causes.

Conclusions: Resident radiologists could accurately and efficiently detect carotid plaques. Scanning by resident radiologists can expand access to ultrasound services. Only the diagnosis of moderate stenosis by resident radiologists was not satisfactory and may require a specialized review from experienced radiologists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由放射科住院医生进行颈动脉评估以扩大超声波服务范围的可行性。
目的:我们的研究旨在确定放射科住院医师诊断颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的准确性,并评估导致错误结果的任何因素:回顾性审查了放射科住院医生在 2021 年 12 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 1 日期间进行的初步颈动脉扫描结果。专家对这些扫描结果进行了即时审查。通过专家诊断评估了放射科住院医生的差异率。然后,针对不同的斑块特征调查了常驻放射科医生的斑块检出率。结果:在颈动脉斑块检测调查中,我院共对 137 名患者的 274 张颈动脉扫描图像进行了评估。斑块检测的总体一致率为 90.9%。回声斑块、侧壁或近壁斑块以及颈动脉球部斑块更容易被放射科住院医生误诊。共有325个斑块被纳入颈动脉狭窄分类调查。狭窄评估的总体一致率为 67.7%。中度狭窄的误诊率高于轻度和重度狭窄(P=0.0003)。灵敏度低至 55.56%。非标准超声技术和错误应用解释标准是两个主要原因:结论:放射科住院医生能准确有效地检测颈动脉斑块。由放射科住院医生进行扫描可以扩大超声服务的覆盖范围。只有中度狭窄的诊断结果不尽人意,可能需要经验丰富的放射科医生进行专门复查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic accuracy of transcranial ultrasonography for detecting stenosis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatic cancer liver metastasis mimicking focal nodular hyperplasia. A case report. The impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans for confirming rectosigmoid endometriosis detected by transvaginal ultrasonography. Advancements and challenges in Shear-Wave Elastography of tendons: a comprehensive review. An [illustrative] update on pediatric emergency ultrasound: part 3 - cerebral, musculoskeletal and other applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1