Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Dignity in Dementia: A Qualitative Analysis.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING Global Qualitative Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333936241278074
Frederik Schou-Juul, Rebecca Amalie Struwe Kjeldsen, Lucca-Mathilde Thorup Ferm, Sigurd Lauridsen
{"title":"Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Dignity in Dementia: A Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Frederik Schou-Juul, Rebecca Amalie Struwe Kjeldsen, Lucca-Mathilde Thorup Ferm, Sigurd Lauridsen","doi":"10.1177/23333936241278074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In dementia care, the concept of dignity has garnered substantial attention from both researchers and policymakers. However, the concept often remains vague and open to interpretation, potentially leading to misunderstandings and suboptimal care for people with dementia. As healthcare professionals occupy a critical role in upholding dignity, exploring their viewpoints on this complex concept is paramount. In this study, we explore Danish healthcare professionals' views on the dignity of people with dementia and discuss these perspectives against existing theoretical accounts. We employed thematic analysis of data collected during facilitated discussions with a total of 99 healthcare professionals, including nurses and healthcare workers, during which we posed the question, \"What is dignity to you?\" and documented their perspectives. Through a systematic process of data coding and interpretation, we identified recurring patterns in their responses. This approach allowed us to uncover the depth and complexity of their viewpoints, providing valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of dignity as perceived by healthcare professionals. Our findings revealed that healthcare professionals possessed a nuanced understanding of dignity, recognizing both a subjective element and a universal aspect applicable to all individuals, aligning with theoretical interpretations. However, conceptual ambiguity remained a challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":45940,"journal":{"name":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936241278074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In dementia care, the concept of dignity has garnered substantial attention from both researchers and policymakers. However, the concept often remains vague and open to interpretation, potentially leading to misunderstandings and suboptimal care for people with dementia. As healthcare professionals occupy a critical role in upholding dignity, exploring their viewpoints on this complex concept is paramount. In this study, we explore Danish healthcare professionals' views on the dignity of people with dementia and discuss these perspectives against existing theoretical accounts. We employed thematic analysis of data collected during facilitated discussions with a total of 99 healthcare professionals, including nurses and healthcare workers, during which we posed the question, "What is dignity to you?" and documented their perspectives. Through a systematic process of data coding and interpretation, we identified recurring patterns in their responses. This approach allowed us to uncover the depth and complexity of their viewpoints, providing valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of dignity as perceived by healthcare professionals. Our findings revealed that healthcare professionals possessed a nuanced understanding of dignity, recognizing both a subjective element and a universal aspect applicable to all individuals, aligning with theoretical interpretations. However, conceptual ambiguity remained a challenge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医护人员对痴呆症患者尊严的看法:定性分析。
在痴呆症护理领域,"尊严 "这一概念受到了研究人员和政策制定者的广泛关注。然而,这一概念往往仍然含糊不清,可有可无,有可能导致误解,并给痴呆症患者带来不尽人意的护理。由于医护人员在维护尊严方面扮演着至关重要的角色,因此探讨他们对这一复杂概念的观点至关重要。在本研究中,我们探讨了丹麦医护人员对痴呆症患者尊严的看法,并根据现有的理论论述对这些观点进行了讨论。在与包括护士和医护人员在内的共 99 名医护专业人员的讨论中,我们提出了 "对您来说什么是尊严?"的问题,并记录了他们的观点。通过系统的数据编码和解释过程,我们发现了他们回答中反复出现的模式。通过这种方法,我们发现了他们观点的深度和复杂性,为了解医护人员眼中尊严的多面性提供了宝贵的见解。我们的研究结果表明,医护专业人员对尊严有着细致入微的理解,既认识到主观因素,也认识到适用于所有人的普遍性,这与理论解释相一致。然而,概念的模糊性仍然是一个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Qualitative Nursing Research (GQNR) is a ground breaking, international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on qualitative research in fields relevant to nursing and other health professionals world-wide. The journal specializes in topics related to nursing practice, responses to health and illness, health promotion, and health care delivery. GQNR will publish research articles using qualitative methods and qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs as well as meta-syntheses and articles focused on methodological development. Special sections include Ethics, Methodological Development, Advancing Theory/Metasynthesis, Establishing Evidence, and Application to Practice.
期刊最新文献
Language Matters: Exploring Preferred Terms for Diverse Populations. Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Dignity in Dementia: A Qualitative Analysis. "The Walls Had Been Built": A Qualitative Study of Canadian Adolescent Perspectives on Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Beyond Burnout: Nurses' Perspectives on Chronic Suffering During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. Public Health Nurses in an Internal Negotiation Process When There Is Concern About the Child's Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1