Give me a second life! Extending the life-span of luxury products through repair

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104055
Mona Mrad , Rania W. Semaan , George Christodoulides , Emanuela Prandelli
{"title":"Give me a second life! Extending the life-span of luxury products through repair","authors":"Mona Mrad ,&nbsp;Rania W. Semaan ,&nbsp;George Christodoulides ,&nbsp;Emanuela Prandelli","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the rise in luxury organizations’ efforts to embrace the circular economy and offer more sustainable options to consumers, research on luxury goods in the circular economy remains limited and primarily focused on “closing loop” strategies––mainly second-hand and rental business models that challenge the traditional concept of luxury. By contrast, there is a complete paucity of research on luxury product repairs that represent a “slowing loop” strategy that aims to prolong the lifecycle of the luxury good. To investigate this phenomenon, we employed a methodology involving 40 interviews with luxury consumers in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), a significant luxury goods market. The findings distinguish between different types of repairs (i.e., luxury brands, luxury department stores, or independent services) and reveal three key barriers to repairs (i.e., the time frame required for the repairs, perceived inconvenience, and lack of experience/awareness). The results further point to three rational (e.g., investment value) and three emotional (e.g., inheritance value) drivers of repairs, as well as positive (e.g., pleasure or pride) and negative (e.g., compromised brand relationship) outcomes. This study contributes to the emerging literature on luxury in a circular economy by specifically examining luxury product repair context and the outcomes of luxury repairs by demonstrating that these outcomes can be either positive or negative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104055"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003515","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the rise in luxury organizations’ efforts to embrace the circular economy and offer more sustainable options to consumers, research on luxury goods in the circular economy remains limited and primarily focused on “closing loop” strategies––mainly second-hand and rental business models that challenge the traditional concept of luxury. By contrast, there is a complete paucity of research on luxury product repairs that represent a “slowing loop” strategy that aims to prolong the lifecycle of the luxury good. To investigate this phenomenon, we employed a methodology involving 40 interviews with luxury consumers in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), a significant luxury goods market. The findings distinguish between different types of repairs (i.e., luxury brands, luxury department stores, or independent services) and reveal three key barriers to repairs (i.e., the time frame required for the repairs, perceived inconvenience, and lack of experience/awareness). The results further point to three rational (e.g., investment value) and three emotional (e.g., inheritance value) drivers of repairs, as well as positive (e.g., pleasure or pride) and negative (e.g., compromised brand relationship) outcomes. This study contributes to the emerging literature on luxury in a circular economy by specifically examining luxury product repair context and the outcomes of luxury repairs by demonstrating that these outcomes can be either positive or negative.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
给我第二次生命通过维修延长奢侈品的使用寿命
尽管奢侈品组织越来越努力地拥抱循环经济,并为消费者提供更多可持续发展的选择,但有关循环经济中奢侈品的研究仍然有限,而且主要集中在 "闭环 "战略上--主要是挑战传统奢侈品概念的二手和租赁商业模式。相比之下,关于奢侈品维修的研究却少之又少,而这种维修代表着一种旨在延长奢侈品生命周期的 "减速循环 "战略。为了研究这一现象,我们采用了一种方法,在阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)这一重要的奢侈品市场,对奢侈品消费者进行了 40 次访谈。研究结果区分了不同类型的维修(即奢侈品牌、奢侈品百货公司或独立服务),并揭示了维修的三个主要障碍(即维修所需的时间、感知到的不便以及缺乏经验/意识)。研究结果进一步指出了维修的三个理性驱动因素(如投资价值)和三个感性驱动因素(如继承价值),以及积极(如愉悦或自豪)和消极(如品牌关系受损)的结果。本研究通过对奢侈品维修背景和奢侈品维修结果的专门研究,证明了这些结果可能是积极的,也可能是消极的,从而为循环经济中有关奢侈品的新兴文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Customers’ reuse intention to autonomous delivery vehicles in terminal delivery service: A valence theory perspective We match! Building online brand engagement behaviours through emotional and rational processes From popularity to pitfalls: Diagnosing consumer issues and engineering solutions for an ink-inspired mobile theme system Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1