{"title":"Turning the ships around: The Russia-Ukraine conflict reshapes the US LNG maritime transportation network","authors":"Sheng Zhang , Liehui Wang , Adolf K.Y. Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy exports are considered a form of power. Following the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the US, as an emerging natural gas exporter, has strengthened energy transport with its allies. However, quantitative analysis of how geopolitical events influence the US's exercise of energy power remains an underexplored area. In this study, we used Automatic Identification System data and US ally relationship data to explore the spatial impacts of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on global liquefied natural gas (LNG) maritime transport and changes in US transport patterns before and after the conflict. The results show that the conflict has tightened US alliances. Transatlantic shipping activity increased the most during the time of soaring global LNG prices, with US treaty allies' coastal areas becoming the most active. Owing to the rerouting of transport ships, traffic through the Panama Canal decreased while Strait of Dover traffic increased, significantly enhancing the US’ transport route coverage to core treaty allies. Our results highlight the potential for future conflict events and emphasize the need to enhance global energy security resilience; prevent LNG from becoming a political tool; and design secure, efficient, and resilient national energy policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124003363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Energy exports are considered a form of power. Following the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the US, as an emerging natural gas exporter, has strengthened energy transport with its allies. However, quantitative analysis of how geopolitical events influence the US's exercise of energy power remains an underexplored area. In this study, we used Automatic Identification System data and US ally relationship data to explore the spatial impacts of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on global liquefied natural gas (LNG) maritime transport and changes in US transport patterns before and after the conflict. The results show that the conflict has tightened US alliances. Transatlantic shipping activity increased the most during the time of soaring global LNG prices, with US treaty allies' coastal areas becoming the most active. Owing to the rerouting of transport ships, traffic through the Panama Canal decreased while Strait of Dover traffic increased, significantly enhancing the US’ transport route coverage to core treaty allies. Our results highlight the potential for future conflict events and emphasize the need to enhance global energy security resilience; prevent LNG from becoming a political tool; and design secure, efficient, and resilient national energy policies.
期刊介绍:
Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels.
We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts.
Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.