‘Where #freedom and #patriotism live:’ Linking digital media to far-right geographies

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Political Geography Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103195
{"title":"‘Where #freedom and #patriotism live:’ Linking digital media to far-right geographies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores some ways that far-right worldviews are digitally encoded and strategically-assembled in and through built environments. The paper argues that an understanding of far-right spatiality will be limited without a more inter-scalar, relational and material framing of the various components of far-right world-building. Assemblage ontologies, seen through comparative cases, therefore hold value in making sense of the far-right today.</p><p>Explorations of how digital media and the far-right are entangled with and co-producing built environments, are thus vital. As ideologies and philosophies (e.g., nationalism or conspiracism) travel across networked medias, complex hybridizations become infrastructurally-fixed-in-place. These affixations produce, and are produced by, geographical communities (e.g., urban developments). Far-right material infrastructures thereby extend from, and into, the digital, mediated by both human and nonhuman processes (such as generative AI), thus becoming co-constitutive elements of place, via land ownership, buildings, aesthetics, social encounters and practices, urban planning processes, and electoral politics; e.g., the assembled spatialities of everyday life.</p><p>The paper juxtaposes two international cases, drawn from ethnography and critical discourse/visual analyses. The first is the territorialisation of circulating notions of American hyper-patriotic nationalism in the suburban South via urban developments and recreational spaces. The second case explores how far-right representations of conspiracism and debates around urban traditionalism versus modernity, are contested online and offline in Dresden, Saxony. Both cases point to the powerful entanglements of far-right ideology, digital media, and <em>place.</em> Conceptually, the paper juxtaposes phenomenological notions of far-right space/place with ideas of ‘strategic assemblage’ and online/offline ‘code space’, as ontological lenses to interrogate the relationships between far-right online worlds and the material configurations of physical infrastructures and materials which have troubling implications for everyday environments and democratic life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001446/pdfft?md5=a97cb21db46c85c019ce4a7b5027ac18&pid=1-s2.0-S0962629824001446-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001446","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores some ways that far-right worldviews are digitally encoded and strategically-assembled in and through built environments. The paper argues that an understanding of far-right spatiality will be limited without a more inter-scalar, relational and material framing of the various components of far-right world-building. Assemblage ontologies, seen through comparative cases, therefore hold value in making sense of the far-right today.

Explorations of how digital media and the far-right are entangled with and co-producing built environments, are thus vital. As ideologies and philosophies (e.g., nationalism or conspiracism) travel across networked medias, complex hybridizations become infrastructurally-fixed-in-place. These affixations produce, and are produced by, geographical communities (e.g., urban developments). Far-right material infrastructures thereby extend from, and into, the digital, mediated by both human and nonhuman processes (such as generative AI), thus becoming co-constitutive elements of place, via land ownership, buildings, aesthetics, social encounters and practices, urban planning processes, and electoral politics; e.g., the assembled spatialities of everyday life.

The paper juxtaposes two international cases, drawn from ethnography and critical discourse/visual analyses. The first is the territorialisation of circulating notions of American hyper-patriotic nationalism in the suburban South via urban developments and recreational spaces. The second case explores how far-right representations of conspiracism and debates around urban traditionalism versus modernity, are contested online and offline in Dresden, Saxony. Both cases point to the powerful entanglements of far-right ideology, digital media, and place. Conceptually, the paper juxtaposes phenomenological notions of far-right space/place with ideas of ‘strategic assemblage’ and online/offline ‘code space’, as ontological lenses to interrogate the relationships between far-right online worlds and the material configurations of physical infrastructures and materials which have troubling implications for everyday environments and democratic life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由与爱国主义之所在:"将数字媒体与极右翼地域联系起来
本文探讨了极右翼世界观在建筑环境中进行数字编码和战略组合的一些方式。本文认为,如果不对极右翼世界构建的各个组成部分进行更具跨尺度、关系性和物质性的构架,那么对极右翼空间性的理解将是有限的。探索数字媒体和极右翼如何与建筑环境纠缠在一起并共同制造建筑环境,因此至关重要。随着意识形态和哲学(如民族主义或阴谋论)在网络媒体中传播,复杂的混合体在基础设施中固定下来。这些固定化产生了地理社群(如城市发展),同时也被地理社群所产生。极右翼的物质基础设施由此从人类和非人类过程(如生成性人工智能)中延伸出来,并进入数字领域,从而通过土地所有权、建筑、美学、社会交往和实践、城市规划过程和选举政治,成为地方的共同构成要素;例如,日常生活的集合空间性。第一个案例是美国超爱国主义民族主义概念通过城市发展和休闲空间在南方郊区的地域化。第二个案例探讨了在萨克森州的德累斯顿,极右翼的阴谋论表述以及围绕城市传统主义与现代性的争论是如何在线上和线下展开的。这两个案例都指出了极右翼意识形态、数字媒体和地方之间的强大纠葛。在概念上,本文将极右空间/地点的现象学概念与 "战略组合 "和线上/线下 "代码空间 "的概念并列,作为本体论的视角来审视极右网络世界与物质基础设施和材料的物质配置之间的关系,这对日常环境和民主生活产生了令人不安的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
‘I felt’: Intimate geographies of sentient diplomacy Knowledge popularization in a technocratic-populist context, or how the Israeli state shaped media coverage of large-scale urban plans Introduction to the special issue – Frontiers of property: promises, pitfalls, and ambivalences of ‘resurgent collectivisation’ in global land and resource governance Checkpoints, competing ‘sovereignties’, and everyday life in Iraq
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1