Neuroticism and cognitive correlates of depression and anxiety in endometriosis: A meta-analytic review, evidence appraisal, and future recommendations
R.A. Davenport , I. Krug , P.L. Dang , N. Rickerby , L. Kiropoulos
{"title":"Neuroticism and cognitive correlates of depression and anxiety in endometriosis: A meta-analytic review, evidence appraisal, and future recommendations","authors":"R.A. Davenport , I. Krug , P.L. Dang , N. Rickerby , L. Kiropoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This meta-analytic review aimed to synthesise evidence on personality and cognitive factors related to depression and anxiety in endometriosis and determine whether sociodemographic and clinical variables moderate factor-symptom relations. Additionally, this review aimed to evaluate the quality of research and formulate recommendations for future research.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted across databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, ProQuest) through to February 2024. Search terms were used for endometriosis, depression, anxiety, cognitive factors and personality traits. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to produce pooled weighted effects (<em>r</em>) for factor-symptom relationships.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen studies (11 samples; <em>N</em> = 3287; M<sub>age</sub> 33.89 ± 2.48) were included in a narrative synthesis. One study provided evidence for a positive association between neuroticism and depression. Seven studies contributed to meta-analyses on three cognitive factors. Medium-to-large associations were identified between illness perceptions of low control/power (<em>r</em> = 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.01,0.62), rumination (<em>r</em> = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.09, 0.78), pain-catastrophising (<em>r</em> = 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.28, 0.45) and higher levels of depression. The statistical power to detect significant effects was >80 %. Findings for anxiety were non-significant, although limited data were available. Quality appraisal revealed a high risk of within-study bias (4.69 ± 1.38, range: 3–7), with issues related to sample representativeness and measurement selection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Rumination, pain-catastrophising, and illness perceptions of low control/power are important in understanding depression in endometriosis. There is a lack of research on personality traits, necessitating further study. Findings highlight the importance of prioritising modifiable cognitive factors in psychological research and clinical practice in endometriosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 111906"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003180/pdfft?md5=529d62b42fc285a09c8de50fd79e9189&pid=1-s2.0-S0022399924003180-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This meta-analytic review aimed to synthesise evidence on personality and cognitive factors related to depression and anxiety in endometriosis and determine whether sociodemographic and clinical variables moderate factor-symptom relations. Additionally, this review aimed to evaluate the quality of research and formulate recommendations for future research.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted across databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, ProQuest) through to February 2024. Search terms were used for endometriosis, depression, anxiety, cognitive factors and personality traits. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to produce pooled weighted effects (r) for factor-symptom relationships.
Results
Thirteen studies (11 samples; N = 3287; Mage 33.89 ± 2.48) were included in a narrative synthesis. One study provided evidence for a positive association between neuroticism and depression. Seven studies contributed to meta-analyses on three cognitive factors. Medium-to-large associations were identified between illness perceptions of low control/power (r = 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.01,0.62), rumination (r = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.09, 0.78), pain-catastrophising (r = 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.28, 0.45) and higher levels of depression. The statistical power to detect significant effects was >80 %. Findings for anxiety were non-significant, although limited data were available. Quality appraisal revealed a high risk of within-study bias (4.69 ± 1.38, range: 3–7), with issues related to sample representativeness and measurement selection.
Conclusion
Rumination, pain-catastrophising, and illness perceptions of low control/power are important in understanding depression in endometriosis. There is a lack of research on personality traits, necessitating further study. Findings highlight the importance of prioritising modifiable cognitive factors in psychological research and clinical practice in endometriosis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.