Country need in the allocation of foreign assistance

IF 2 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Development Policy Review Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1111/dpr.12795
Jake Grover
{"title":"Country need in the allocation of foreign assistance","authors":"Jake Grover","doi":"10.1111/dpr.12795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>Donors allocate huge sums for assistance intended for poverty reduction to countries that arguably do not need it. For example, the United States spends more in Jordan—with no extreme poverty—than it does in the six countries with the highest poverty rates in the world combined, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Somalia. Prior studies have suggested that if global aid were allocated according to need, it could roughly double its impact on poverty reduction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Country need can be broken down into the magnitude of the development challenge and the domestic resources available. This study examines these two components of development need to determine which countries have the greatest need for foreign assistance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach and methods</h3>\n \n <p>I produce a set of data-driven observations documenting the magnitude of the challenge and the resources available. I first explore which countries have the highest rates of absolute and multidimensional poverty. I then examine which countries have the ability to redistribute by comparing their poverty gaps with the potential domestic resources available. This produces the marginal tax rate (MTR) required for a country to finance its own poverty eradication.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>There is a clear trend in the magnitude of the challenge: low-income countries (LICs) have the highest poverty rates by far; lower middle-income countries (LMICs) are more mixed; and upper middle-income countries (UMICs) have comparatively little extreme poverty, except in a small handful of countries. The implied MTRs required to close a country's extreme poverty gap are excessively high for LICs and most LMICs but easily manageable for most UMICs. This strongly suggests that both the magnitude of the challenge is much greater and the resources available much lower in LICs and LMICs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>The policy implication is that LICs and LMICs should be strongly favoured in terms of aid allocation. The two different components of country need point in the same direction and both suggest a strong focus on allocating assistance towards the poorest countries.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivation

Donors allocate huge sums for assistance intended for poverty reduction to countries that arguably do not need it. For example, the United States spends more in Jordan—with no extreme poverty—than it does in the six countries with the highest poverty rates in the world combined, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Somalia. Prior studies have suggested that if global aid were allocated according to need, it could roughly double its impact on poverty reduction.

Purpose

Country need can be broken down into the magnitude of the development challenge and the domestic resources available. This study examines these two components of development need to determine which countries have the greatest need for foreign assistance.

Approach and methods

I produce a set of data-driven observations documenting the magnitude of the challenge and the resources available. I first explore which countries have the highest rates of absolute and multidimensional poverty. I then examine which countries have the ability to redistribute by comparing their poverty gaps with the potential domestic resources available. This produces the marginal tax rate (MTR) required for a country to finance its own poverty eradication.

Findings

There is a clear trend in the magnitude of the challenge: low-income countries (LICs) have the highest poverty rates by far; lower middle-income countries (LMICs) are more mixed; and upper middle-income countries (UMICs) have comparatively little extreme poverty, except in a small handful of countries. The implied MTRs required to close a country's extreme poverty gap are excessively high for LICs and most LMICs but easily manageable for most UMICs. This strongly suggests that both the magnitude of the challenge is much greater and the resources available much lower in LICs and LMICs.

Policy implications

The policy implication is that LICs and LMICs should be strongly favoured in terms of aid allocation. The two different components of country need point in the same direction and both suggest a strong focus on allocating assistance towards the poorest countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外国援助分配中的国家需求
动机 捐助国将用于减贫的巨额援助资金分配给那些可以说并不需要的国家。例如,美国在约旦(没有极端贫困人口)的支出比在刚果民主共和国和索马里等六个世界上贫困率最高的国家的支出总和还要多。先前的研究表明,如果根据需求来分配全球援助,其减贫效果大约可以翻倍。 目的 国家需求可细分为发展挑战的严重程度和可用的国内资源。本研究探讨了发展需求的这两个组成部分,以确定哪些国家最需要外国援助。 途径和方法 我制作了一套数据驱动的观察结果,记录了挑战的严重程度和可用资源。我首先探讨哪些国家的绝对贫困率和多维贫困率最高。然后,我通过比较贫困差距和潜在的国内可用资源,考察哪些国家有能力进行再分配。这就得出了一个国家为本国消除贫困提供资金所需的边际税率(MTR)。 研究结果 挑战的严重程度有一个明显的趋势:到目前为止,低收入国家的贫困率最高;中低收入国家的情况较为复杂;中高收入国家的极端贫困现象相对较少,只有少数几个国家例外。消除一国极端贫困差距所需的隐含中期目标对低收入国家和大多数低收入国家来说过高,但对大多数中上收入国家来说却很容易控制。这有力地表明,低收入国家和低收入中等收入国家面临的挑战更大,可利用的资源更少。 政策含义 政策含义是,在援助分配方面,应大力向低收入国家和低收入中等收入国家倾斜。国家需求的两个不同组成部分指向同一个方向,都表明应大力注重向最贫穷国家分配援助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Assessing the success of National Human Rights Action Plans from a political economy perspective: The case of Chile Reshaping gender norms: Exploring the ripple effect of refugeeism on women's empowerment Does subsidizing seed help farmers? Nepal's rice seed subsidies Social sustainability discourse in cohesion policy: A critical review of Interreg Europe 2021–2027
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1