Imatinib adherence prediction using machine learning approach in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35548
Li Liu, Ze Yu, Hefen Chen, Zhujun Gong, Xiao Huang, Linhua Chen, Ziying Fan, Jinyuan Zhang, Jiannan Yan, Hongkun Tian, Xiangyu Zeng, Zhiliang Chen, Peng Zhang, Hong Zhou
{"title":"Imatinib adherence prediction using machine learning approach in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.","authors":"Li Liu, Ze Yu, Hefen Chen, Zhujun Gong, Xiao Huang, Linhua Chen, Ziying Fan, Jinyuan Zhang, Jiannan Yan, Hongkun Tian, Xiangyu Zeng, Zhiliang Chen, Peng Zhang, Hong Zhou","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonadherence to imatinib is common in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), which is associated with poor prognosis and financial burden. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the adherence rate in patients with GIST and subsequently develop a model based on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to identify the associated factors and predict the risk of imatinib nonadherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All eligible patients completed four sections of questionnaires. After the data set was preprocessed, statistically significance variables were identified and further processed to modeling. Six ML and four DL algorithms were applied for modeling, including eXtreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), categorical boosting, random forest, support vector machine, artificial neural network, multilayer perceptron, NaiveBayes, TabNet, and Wide&Deep. The optimal ML model was used to identify potential factors for predicting adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 397 GIST patients were recruited. Nonadherence was observed in 185 patients (53.4%). LGBM exhibited superior performance, achieving a mean f1_score of 0.65 and standard deviation of 0.12. The predominant indicators for nonadherent prediction of imatinib were cognitive functioning, whether to perform therapeutic drug monitoring (if_TDM), global health status score, social support, and gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study represents the first real-world investigation using ML techniques to predict risk factors associated with imatinib nonadherence in patients with GIST. By highlighting the potential factors and identifying high-risk patients, the multidisciplinary medical team can devise targeted strategies to effectively address the daily challenges of treatment adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonadherence to imatinib is common in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), which is associated with poor prognosis and financial burden. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the adherence rate in patients with GIST and subsequently develop a model based on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to identify the associated factors and predict the risk of imatinib nonadherence.

Methods: All eligible patients completed four sections of questionnaires. After the data set was preprocessed, statistically significance variables were identified and further processed to modeling. Six ML and four DL algorithms were applied for modeling, including eXtreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), categorical boosting, random forest, support vector machine, artificial neural network, multilayer perceptron, NaiveBayes, TabNet, and Wide&Deep. The optimal ML model was used to identify potential factors for predicting adherence.

Results: A total of 397 GIST patients were recruited. Nonadherence was observed in 185 patients (53.4%). LGBM exhibited superior performance, achieving a mean f1_score of 0.65 and standard deviation of 0.12. The predominant indicators for nonadherent prediction of imatinib were cognitive functioning, whether to perform therapeutic drug monitoring (if_TDM), global health status score, social support, and gender.

Conclusions: This study represents the first real-world investigation using ML techniques to predict risk factors associated with imatinib nonadherence in patients with GIST. By highlighting the potential factors and identifying high-risk patients, the multidisciplinary medical team can devise targeted strategies to effectively address the daily challenges of treatment adherence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习方法预测胃肠道间质瘤患者的伊马替尼依从性
背景:胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者不坚持服用伊马替尼的情况很常见,这与预后不良和经济负担有关。本研究的主要目的是调查 GIST 患者的依从率,随后开发一个基于机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)技术的模型,以识别相关因素并预测伊马替尼不依从的风险:所有符合条件的患者均填写了四部分问卷。方法:所有符合条件的患者都填写了四部分问卷,在对数据集进行预处理后,确定了具有统计学意义的变量,并进一步进行建模处理。在建模过程中应用了六种 ML 算法和四种 DL 算法,包括极梯度提升算法(eXtreme gradient boosting)、轻梯度提升算法(light gradient boosting machine,LGBM)、分类提升算法(categorical boosting)、随机森林算法、支持向量机算法、人工神经网络算法、多层感知器算法、NaiveBayes 算法、TabNet 算法和 Wide&Deep 算法。最优的 ML 模型用于确定预测依从性的潜在因素:共招募了 397 名 GIST 患者。185名患者(53.4%)未坚持治疗。LGBM 表现优异,平均 f1_score 为 0.65,标准偏差为 0.12。预测伊马替尼非依从性的主要指标是认知功能、是否进行治疗药物监测(if_TDM)、总体健康状况评分、社会支持和性别:本研究是首次使用 ML 技术预测与 GIST 患者不依从伊马替尼相关的风险因素的真实世界调查。通过强调潜在因素和识别高风险患者,多学科医疗团队可以制定有针对性的策略,有效应对坚持治疗的日常挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-relevant outcomes in comprehensive cancer centers versus noncomprehensive cancer centers. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline update on palliative care for patients with cancer: Addressing the reality gap. Embrace with caution: The limitations of generative artificial intelligence in responding to patient health care queries. Expression of Concern. Global disparities in cancer care: Bridging the gap in affordability and access to medications between high and low-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1