Psychotherapies for the treatment of personality disorders: the state of the art.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Current Opinion in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000968
Paul M G Emmelkamp, Katharina Meyerbröker
{"title":"Psychotherapies for the treatment of personality disorders: the state of the art.","authors":"Paul M G Emmelkamp, Katharina Meyerbröker","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To provide an update of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and recent clinical outcome studies for personality disorder (PD) in order to investigate the state of the art of the evidence of psychotherapy for personality disorders.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Few outcome studies in patients with Cluster A and Cluster C PD have been conducted, which limits the conclusions which can be drawn. Most recently published research has been conducted with borderline PD. There is limited evidence that dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), mentalization based therapy and schema therapy are more effective than treatment as usual. There is no convincing evidence that long and intensive therapy is more effective than short and less intensive therapy. Drop-out is rather high for patients with borderline PD. Group therapy results in more drop-outs than individual therapy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is a clear need of studies evaluating whether psychotherapies developed for PDs are more effective than CBT for patients with Cluster C PD. Given that studies with patients with Cluster B PD suggest that longer treatment of DBT and mentalization-based treatment is not more effective than shorter treatment this needs to be studied with other evidence-based therapies as well. Serious efforts are needed to evaluate therapies for patients with Cluster A PDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: To provide an update of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and recent clinical outcome studies for personality disorder (PD) in order to investigate the state of the art of the evidence of psychotherapy for personality disorders.

Recent findings: Few outcome studies in patients with Cluster A and Cluster C PD have been conducted, which limits the conclusions which can be drawn. Most recently published research has been conducted with borderline PD. There is limited evidence that dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), mentalization based therapy and schema therapy are more effective than treatment as usual. There is no convincing evidence that long and intensive therapy is more effective than short and less intensive therapy. Drop-out is rather high for patients with borderline PD. Group therapy results in more drop-outs than individual therapy.

Summary: There is a clear need of studies evaluating whether psychotherapies developed for PDs are more effective than CBT for patients with Cluster C PD. Given that studies with patients with Cluster B PD suggest that longer treatment of DBT and mentalization-based treatment is not more effective than shorter treatment this needs to be studied with other evidence-based therapies as well. Serious efforts are needed to evaluate therapies for patients with Cluster A PDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗人格障碍的心理疗法:最新进展。
综述目的:提供有关人格障碍(PD)的系统综述、荟萃分析和最新临床结果研究的最新情况,以调查人格障碍心理治疗证据的最新进展:针对 A 群和 C 群人格障碍患者的疗效研究很少,这限制了可得出的结论。最近发表的大多数研究都是针对边缘型人格障碍的。有有限的证据表明,辩证行为疗法(DBT)、心智化疗法和模式疗法比常规治疗更有效。没有令人信服的证据表明长期强化治疗比短期和低强度治疗更有效。边缘型帕金森病患者的辍学率相当高。总结:对于C群型帕金森病患者而言,显然有必要开展研究,评估针对帕金森病开发的心理疗法是否比CBT更有效。鉴于对B群型帕金森病患者的研究表明,DBT和基于精神化的较长时间治疗并不比较短时间治疗更有效,因此还需要对其他循证疗法进行研究。我们需要认真努力,评估针对 A 群型帕金森病患者的疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Mortality in people with mental disorders in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide, register-based cohort study. Early intervention for eating disorders. Effectiveness and predictors of psychotherapy in eating disorders: state-of-the-art and future directions. Systematic review of the epidemiology of eating disorders in the Arab world. Eating disorders: etiology, risk factors, and suggestions for prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1