Longitudinal Multiparametric Quantitative MRI Evaluation of Acute and Chronic Multiple Sclerosis Paramagnetic Rim Lesions.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1002/jmri.29583
Ahmed M Elkady, Colm Elliott, Dumitru Fetco, David Araujo, Zahra Karimaghaloo, Marco Ganzetti, David Clayton, Licinio Craveiro, Agne Kazlauskaite, Sridar Narayanan, Douglas L Arnold, David A Rudko
{"title":"Longitudinal Multiparametric Quantitative MRI Evaluation of Acute and Chronic Multiple Sclerosis Paramagnetic Rim Lesions.","authors":"Ahmed M Elkady, Colm Elliott, Dumitru Fetco, David Araujo, Zahra Karimaghaloo, Marco Ganzetti, David Clayton, Licinio Craveiro, Agne Kazlauskaite, Sridar Narayanan, Douglas L Arnold, David A Rudko","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are markers of chronic active biology and exhibit complex iron and myelin changes that may complicate quantification when using conventional MRI approaches.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To conduct a multiparametric MRI analysis of PRLs.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Retrospective/longitudinal.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Ninety-five progressive MS subjects with at least one persistent PRL who were enrolled in the CONSONANCE trial.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3-T/Susceptibility-weighted, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Acute/chronic PRLs and non-PRLs were measured at screening, 24, 48, and 96 weeks using quantitative magnetic susceptibility (QS), R2*, and standardized T1w/T2w ratio (sT1w/T2w). PRL analyses were performed for whole lesion, core, and rim. The correlations between PRL core and rim sT1w/T2w, QS, and R2* were assessed.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Linear mixed models. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant decrease in sT1w/T2w (-0.24 ± -5.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup>) and R2* (-3.6 ± 2.2 Hz) but a significant increase in QS (+21 ± 1.3 ppb) using whole-lesion analysis of chronic PRLs compared to non-PRLs at screening. Tissue damage accumulated at the 96-week time point was more evident in acute/chronic PRLs compared to acute/chronic non-PRLs (ΔsT1w/T2w = -0.21/-0.24 ± 0.033/0.0053; ΔR2* = -4.4/-3.6 ± 1.4/2.2 Hz). New, acute PRL sT1w/T2w significantly increased in lesion core (+4.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup> ± 1.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup>) and rim (+5.6 × 10<sup>-3</sup> ± 1.2 × 10<sup>-4</sup>) 24 weeks post lesion inception, suggestive of partial recovery. Chronic PRLs, contrastingly, showed significant decreases in sT1w/T2w over the initial 24 weeks for both core (-2.1 × 10<sup>-4</sup> ± 2.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and rim (-2.4 × 10<sup>-4</sup> ± 2.0 × 10<sup>-5</sup>), indicative of irreversible tissue damage. Significant positive correlations between PRL core and rim sT1w/T2w (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.53), R2* (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.69) and QS (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.52) were observed.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>Multiparametric assessment of PRLs has the potential to be a valuable tool for assessing complex iron and myelin changes in chronic active PRLs of progressive MS patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are markers of chronic active biology and exhibit complex iron and myelin changes that may complicate quantification when using conventional MRI approaches.

Purpose: To conduct a multiparametric MRI analysis of PRLs.

Study type: Retrospective/longitudinal.

Subjects: Ninety-five progressive MS subjects with at least one persistent PRL who were enrolled in the CONSONANCE trial.

Field strength/sequence: 3-T/Susceptibility-weighted, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery.

Assessment: Acute/chronic PRLs and non-PRLs were measured at screening, 24, 48, and 96 weeks using quantitative magnetic susceptibility (QS), R2*, and standardized T1w/T2w ratio (sT1w/T2w). PRL analyses were performed for whole lesion, core, and rim. The correlations between PRL core and rim sT1w/T2w, QS, and R2* were assessed.

Statistical tests: Linear mixed models. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: There was a significant decrease in sT1w/T2w (-0.24 ± -5.3 × 10-3) and R2* (-3.6 ± 2.2 Hz) but a significant increase in QS (+21 ± 1.3 ppb) using whole-lesion analysis of chronic PRLs compared to non-PRLs at screening. Tissue damage accumulated at the 96-week time point was more evident in acute/chronic PRLs compared to acute/chronic non-PRLs (ΔsT1w/T2w = -0.21/-0.24 ± 0.033/0.0053; ΔR2* = -4.4/-3.6 ± 1.4/2.2 Hz). New, acute PRL sT1w/T2w significantly increased in lesion core (+4.3 × 10-3 ± 1.2 × 10-4) and rim (+5.6 × 10-3 ± 1.2 × 10-4) 24 weeks post lesion inception, suggestive of partial recovery. Chronic PRLs, contrastingly, showed significant decreases in sT1w/T2w over the initial 24 weeks for both core (-2.1 × 10-4 ± 2.0 × 10-5) and rim (-2.4 × 10-4 ± 2.0 × 10-5), indicative of irreversible tissue damage. Significant positive correlations between PRL core and rim sT1w/T2w (R2 = 0.53), R2* (R2 = 0.69) and QS (R2 = 0.52) were observed.

Data conclusion: Multiparametric assessment of PRLs has the potential to be a valuable tool for assessing complex iron and myelin changes in chronic active PRLs of progressive MS patients.

Level of evidence: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对急性和慢性多发性硬化症顺磁边缘病变的纵向多参数定量 MRI 评估
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)顺磁性边缘病变(PRLs)是慢性活动性生物标志物,表现出复杂的铁和髓鞘变化,这可能使传统 MRI 方法的量化变得复杂:研究类型:回顾性/纵向研究:研究类型:回顾性/纵向研究。受试者:95名进展期多发性硬化症受试者,他们至少有一个持续性PRL,并参加了CONSONANCE试验:3-T/感度加权、T1加权、T2加权和液体衰减反转恢复:在筛查、24、48 和 96 周时使用定量磁感应强度 (QS)、R2* 和标准化 T1w/T2w 比值 (sT1w/T2w) 测量急性/慢性 PRL 和非 PRL。对整个病灶、核心和边缘进行了 PRL 分析。评估了 PRL 核心和边缘 sT1w/T2w、QS 和 R2* 之间的相关性:线性混合模型。A P值 结果:与筛查时的非PRL相比,通过对慢性PRL进行全组织分析,sT1w/T2w(-0.24 ± -5.3 × 10-3)和R2*(-3.6 ± 2.2 Hz)明显下降,但QS(+21 ± 1.3 ppb)明显上升。与急性/慢性非 PRL 相比,急性/慢性 PRL 在 96 周时间点累积的组织损伤更为明显(ΔsT1w/T2w = -0.21/-0.24 ± 0.033/0.0053;ΔR2* = -4.4/-3.6 ± 1.4/2.2 Hz)。新的急性PRL sT1w/T2w在病变开始后24周在病变核心(+4.3 × 10-3 ± 1.2 × 10-4)和边缘(+5.6 × 10-3 ± 1.2 × 10-4)显著增加,提示部分恢复。相反,慢性 PRL 在最初的 24 周内,核心(-2.1 × 10-4 ± 2.0 × 10-5)和边缘(-2.4 × 10-4 ± 2.0 × 10-5)的 sT1w/T2w 均显著下降,表明组织损伤不可逆转。在 PRL 核心和边缘 sT1w/T2w (R2 = 0.53)、R2* (R2 = 0.69) 和 QS (R2 = 0.52) 之间观察到显著的正相关:数据结论:PRL的多参数评估有可能成为评估进展期多发性硬化症患者慢性活动性PRL中复杂的铁和髓鞘变化的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Utility of DTI-ALPS in Identifying Dysfunction in the "Glymphatic" System. Simultaneous Bilateral T1, T2, and T Relaxation Mapping of Hip Joint With 3D-MRI Fingerprinting. Editorial for "Assessing the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Assistance for Prostate MRI: A Two-Center Study Involving Radiologists With Different Experience Levels". A Review of MRI Acoustic Noise Outputs and Hearing Protection Device Performance. Incorporating Radiologist Knowledge Into MRI Quality Metrics for Machine Learning Using Rank-Based Ratings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1