Hosna Asma Ull, Misha P T Kaandorp, Andras Jakab, Hyun Gi Kim
Brain age is an emerging concept that reflects complex, time-dependent changes in brain structure, identifying departures from expected neurodevelopmental patterns. In the developing brain, accurate MRI-based age estimation is a quantitative biomarker for detecting atypical neurodevelopment, facilitating early diagnosis, guiding clinical decision-making, and potentially improving long-term outcomes. Data-driven models applied to neuroimaging have provided valuable insights into the pathogenesis of various congenital and acquired pediatric conditions. In particular, advanced deep learning approaches have recently gained prominence in a wide range of pediatric neuroimaging studies, offering state-of-the-art performance in estimating developmental brain age. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of the current MRI applications of deep learning methodologies for developmental brain age (fetal stage-2 years) estimation. We provide details on both clinical and technical aspects, open-access developmental MRI datasets, and compare the performance of these models utilizing evaluation metrics. Additionally, we discuss the applications of brain age estimation in clinical research contexts, highlighting its importance in understanding neurodevelopmental disorders. Finally, we address the challenges faced and propose future research directions to advance the field of brain age estimation. We aim to provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners, facilitating advancements in both theoretical understanding and practical applications of MRI-based deep learning brain age estimation of the developing brain. Evidence Level: 3. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.
{"title":"Developmental Brain Age Estimation From MRI Data: A Systematic Review of Deep Learning Approaches and Open Datasets.","authors":"Hosna Asma Ull, Misha P T Kaandorp, Andras Jakab, Hyun Gi Kim","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain age is an emerging concept that reflects complex, time-dependent changes in brain structure, identifying departures from expected neurodevelopmental patterns. In the developing brain, accurate MRI-based age estimation is a quantitative biomarker for detecting atypical neurodevelopment, facilitating early diagnosis, guiding clinical decision-making, and potentially improving long-term outcomes. Data-driven models applied to neuroimaging have provided valuable insights into the pathogenesis of various congenital and acquired pediatric conditions. In particular, advanced deep learning approaches have recently gained prominence in a wide range of pediatric neuroimaging studies, offering state-of-the-art performance in estimating developmental brain age. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of the current MRI applications of deep learning methodologies for developmental brain age (fetal stage-2 years) estimation. We provide details on both clinical and technical aspects, open-access developmental MRI datasets, and compare the performance of these models utilizing evaluation metrics. Additionally, we discuss the applications of brain age estimation in clinical research contexts, highlighting its importance in understanding neurodevelopmental disorders. Finally, we address the challenges faced and propose future research directions to advance the field of brain age estimation. We aim to provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners, facilitating advancements in both theoretical understanding and practical applications of MRI-based deep learning brain age estimation of the developing brain. Evidence Level: 3. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145781405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emre Kopanoglu, Michael Steckner, Michael N Hoff, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn, Andrew G Webb, Scott B Reeder, Vikas Gulani
Despite its unequivocal value in radiological diagnosis, access to conventional high-field MRI systems remains extremely uneven across the world. Access is particularly limited in underfunded and remote settings, due to the high cost and infrastructure requirements of MRI systems. Low-field MRI offers a range of benefits including affordability, portability, suitability for use in intensive care units, and for point-of-care imaging. Different low-field configurations enhance flexibility in various clinical scenarios, including imaging claustrophobic or obese subjects, accommodating different body postures, extremity-focused investigations, and neonatal imaging. Moreover, lower field strengths offer important safety benefits. However, the overarching assumption that lower fields are safe without exception may foster a false sense of security, potentially leading to hazardous situations. On behalf of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, this paper provides a comprehensive review of important safety considerations for low-field MRI, aiming to inform users and stakeholders of both its benefits and limitations, and to empower them toward its safe use. These recommendations are likely to evolve as new evidence becomes available. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
{"title":"MRI and Implant Safety at Low-Field and Ultralow-Field Strengths.","authors":"Emre Kopanoglu, Michael Steckner, Michael N Hoff, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn, Andrew G Webb, Scott B Reeder, Vikas Gulani","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite its unequivocal value in radiological diagnosis, access to conventional high-field MRI systems remains extremely uneven across the world. Access is particularly limited in underfunded and remote settings, due to the high cost and infrastructure requirements of MRI systems. Low-field MRI offers a range of benefits including affordability, portability, suitability for use in intensive care units, and for point-of-care imaging. Different low-field configurations enhance flexibility in various clinical scenarios, including imaging claustrophobic or obese subjects, accommodating different body postures, extremity-focused investigations, and neonatal imaging. Moreover, lower field strengths offer important safety benefits. However, the overarching assumption that lower fields are safe without exception may foster a false sense of security, potentially leading to hazardous situations. On behalf of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, this paper provides a comprehensive review of important safety considerations for low-field MRI, aiming to inform users and stakeholders of both its benefits and limitations, and to empower them toward its safe use. These recommendations are likely to evolve as new evidence becomes available. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145794196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrated FDG PET-MRI images suggest increased risk for underlying Alzheimer's disease pathology in 73 year old with memory loss and word finding difficulty. On MRI there is severe hippocampal atrophy (A; axial FLAIR; arrow), mild biparietal sulcal prominence (B; coronal MPRAGE; arrows) and mild white matter changes (C; axial FLAIR; arrow). FDG surface maps demonstrate symmetric confluent parietotemporal lobe FDG hypometabolism (D; arrows). By Shepherd and Dogra (60–78)