Does the presence of preoperative neck pain impact clinical outcomes after posterior decompression in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament?: Retrospective multicenter cohort study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spinal cord Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1038/s41393-024-01027-z
Toshiki Okubo, Narihito Nagoshi, Takahito Iga, Takashi Tsuji, Yosuke Horiuchi, Kazuya Kitamura, Kenshi Daimon, Haruki Funao, Kazuki Takeda, Masahiro Ozaki, Satoshi Suzuki, Osahiko Tsuji, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe, Ken Ishii, Junichi Yamane
{"title":"Does the presence of preoperative neck pain impact clinical outcomes after posterior decompression in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament?: Retrospective multicenter cohort study","authors":"Toshiki Okubo, Narihito Nagoshi, Takahito Iga, Takashi Tsuji, Yosuke Horiuchi, Kazuya Kitamura, Kenshi Daimon, Haruki Funao, Kazuki Takeda, Masahiro Ozaki, Satoshi Suzuki, Osahiko Tsuji, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe, Ken Ishii, Junichi Yamane","doi":"10.1038/s41393-024-01027-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retrospective multicenter study. To evaluate how preoperative neck pain influences clinical outcomes following posterior decompression for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Fourteen medical institutions in Japan. We enrolled 90 patients with cervical OPLL who underwent posterior decompression and were followed for a minimum of two years. We collected demographic data, medical history, and imaging findings. Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative neck pain presence (Pre-op. neck pain (−) and (+) groups), and their outcomes were compared. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the Pre-op. neck pain (−) and (+) groups. Both groups showed similar distributions of ossification types and K-line positivity. Perioperative complications were comparable between the two groups. Radiographic analysis revealed no significant differences in C2–7 angles or cervical range of motion, pre- and postoperatively. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in postoperative Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) scores, but there were no significant differences in scores or recovery rates. In the Pre-op. neck pain (−) group, factors associated with appearance of postoperative neck pain included pre- and postoperative lower JOA scores and larger C2–7 angles in neutral and extension positions. It emerges that lower pre- and postoperative JOA scores or larger C2–7 angles in neutral and extension positions predispose to postoperative neck pain even in those patients without preoperative neck pain. Therefore, this is worth discussing at the time of consenting patients for surgical decompression and fixation.","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":"62 11","pages":"619-624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-024-01027-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrospective multicenter study. To evaluate how preoperative neck pain influences clinical outcomes following posterior decompression for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Fourteen medical institutions in Japan. We enrolled 90 patients with cervical OPLL who underwent posterior decompression and were followed for a minimum of two years. We collected demographic data, medical history, and imaging findings. Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative neck pain presence (Pre-op. neck pain (−) and (+) groups), and their outcomes were compared. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the Pre-op. neck pain (−) and (+) groups. Both groups showed similar distributions of ossification types and K-line positivity. Perioperative complications were comparable between the two groups. Radiographic analysis revealed no significant differences in C2–7 angles or cervical range of motion, pre- and postoperatively. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in postoperative Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) scores, but there were no significant differences in scores or recovery rates. In the Pre-op. neck pain (−) group, factors associated with appearance of postoperative neck pain included pre- and postoperative lower JOA scores and larger C2–7 angles in neutral and extension positions. It emerges that lower pre- and postoperative JOA scores or larger C2–7 angles in neutral and extension positions predispose to postoperative neck pain even in those patients without preoperative neck pain. Therefore, this is worth discussing at the time of consenting patients for surgical decompression and fixation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎后纵韧带骨化症患者术前颈部疼痛是否会影响后路减压术后的临床效果?
研究设计回顾性多中心研究:评估颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)后路减压术后,术前颈部疼痛对临床疗效的影响:方法:我们招募了90名颈后纵韧带骨化症患者:我们招募了 90 名接受后路减压术的颈椎后纵韧带骨化症患者,并对他们进行了至少两年的随访。我们收集了人口统计学数据、病史和影像学检查结果。根据术前是否存在颈部疼痛将患者分为两组(术前颈部疼痛(-)组和(+)组),并对两组患者的治疗效果进行比较:结果:术前颈部疼痛(-)组和(+)组患者的人口统计学特征无明显差异。两组患者的骨化类型和 K 线阳性率分布相似。两组围手术期并发症相似。放射学分析表明,术前和术后 C2-7 角或颈椎活动范围无明显差异。两组患者术后的日本矫形协会(JOA)评分均有明显改善,但评分或恢复率无明显差异。在术前颈部疼痛(-)组中,与术后出现颈部疼痛相关的因素包括术前和术后较低的 JOA 评分以及在中立位和伸展位时较大的 C2-7 角度:结论:即使是术前无颈部疼痛的患者,术前和术后较低的 JOA 评分或在中立位和伸展位时较大的 C2-7 角也容易导致术后颈部疼痛。因此,在同意患者接受手术减压和固定时,这一点值得讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
期刊最新文献
The influencing factors for tracheostomy decannulation after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. "What should a rehabilitation hospital be like?" Priorities and expectations of people with spinal cord injury in Türkiye. The effect of abdominal functional electrical stimulation on blood pressure in people with high level spinal cord injury. Mortality and causes of death of traumatic spinal cord injury in Finland. Correspondence to "Walking improvement in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury with exoskeleton robotic training (WISE): a randomized controlled trial".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1