Impact of obstructive sleep apnoea on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
{"title":"Impact of obstructive sleep apnoea on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yajing Ni, Yan Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03154-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and postoperative complications in patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases were explored to identify relevant observational studies that reported incidences of OSA in CABG patients, and assessed OSA using standard objective methods such as polysomnography (PSG). The primary outcomes of interest were risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause mortality. Pooled effect sizes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were included. All studies, except one, had a prospective cohort design. CABG patients with OSA had increased risk of MACCE (OR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.16, 2.53), myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 2.21, 95% CI: 1.19, 4.13), pulmonary complications (OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.38), renal complications (OR 8.14, 95% CI: 2.07, 32.1), heart failure (OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.89) and need for revascularization (OR 2.80, 95% CI: 1.01, 7.75). However, risk of all-cause mortality (OR 1.63, 95% CI: 0.75, 3.52) was comparable in all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that OSA significantly correlates with the increased risk of major adverse events. Our results indicate that recognizing and managing OSA in CABG patients is crucial for mitigating associated risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":" ","pages":"2345-2353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03154-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the association between obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and postoperative complications in patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases were explored to identify relevant observational studies that reported incidences of OSA in CABG patients, and assessed OSA using standard objective methods such as polysomnography (PSG). The primary outcomes of interest were risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause mortality. Pooled effect sizes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Twelve studies were included. All studies, except one, had a prospective cohort design. CABG patients with OSA had increased risk of MACCE (OR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.16, 2.53), myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 2.21, 95% CI: 1.19, 4.13), pulmonary complications (OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.38), renal complications (OR 8.14, 95% CI: 2.07, 32.1), heart failure (OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.89) and need for revascularization (OR 2.80, 95% CI: 1.01, 7.75). However, risk of all-cause mortality (OR 1.63, 95% CI: 0.75, 3.52) was comparable in all patients.
Conclusion: This study showed that OSA significantly correlates with the increased risk of major adverse events. Our results indicate that recognizing and managing OSA in CABG patients is crucial for mitigating associated risks.
期刊介绍:
The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep.
Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.