Establishing a Standard for Creating Angle-Corrected, Reformatted Brain CT Images.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiologic Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Yuhao Wu, Momina Mateen, Matthew Stewart, Brent Burbridge
{"title":"Establishing a Standard for Creating Angle-Corrected, Reformatted Brain CT Images.","authors":"Yuhao Wu, Momina Mateen, Matthew Stewart, Brent Burbridge","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish a standardized method of reformatting axial images for computed tomography (CT) brain examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anatomic line between the superior orbital rim and the base of the occipital bone (SOR-BS line) was chosen as the standardized reference line. In June 2022, CT technologists at a tertiary care center received an educational presentation and a 1-page reference handout on making standardized CT reformats. This was the quality-of-care intervention. Subsequently, 100 CT brain examinations performed on July 1 to 10, 2020 (preintervention) were analyzed and compared with 100 CT brain examinations performed on July 1 to 10, 2022 (postintervention).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the mean angle differences measured between the preintervention (6.2 ± 5.8°) and the postintervention (5.8 ± 4.7°) groups (<i>P</i> = .67). However, the number of CT brain studies with an angle difference of more than 20° decreased from 4 studies to 1 study. In addition, the number of CT brain studies without reformatted images decreased from 5 to 2 studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cause for the less-than-optimal adoption of the expected change in CT workflow might be complex and multifactorial. However, the institution in this study is a busy tertiary care center with a chronic shortage of CT technologists. The busy workflow might have contributed to lack of significance for the parameters assessed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a slight but not significant improvement between preintervention and postintervention data.</p>","PeriodicalId":51772,"journal":{"name":"Radiologic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To establish a standardized method of reformatting axial images for computed tomography (CT) brain examinations.

Methods: An anatomic line between the superior orbital rim and the base of the occipital bone (SOR-BS line) was chosen as the standardized reference line. In June 2022, CT technologists at a tertiary care center received an educational presentation and a 1-page reference handout on making standardized CT reformats. This was the quality-of-care intervention. Subsequently, 100 CT brain examinations performed on July 1 to 10, 2020 (preintervention) were analyzed and compared with 100 CT brain examinations performed on July 1 to 10, 2022 (postintervention).

Results: There were no significant differences in the mean angle differences measured between the preintervention (6.2 ± 5.8°) and the postintervention (5.8 ± 4.7°) groups (P = .67). However, the number of CT brain studies with an angle difference of more than 20° decreased from 4 studies to 1 study. In addition, the number of CT brain studies without reformatted images decreased from 5 to 2 studies.

Discussion: The cause for the less-than-optimal adoption of the expected change in CT workflow might be complex and multifactorial. However, the institution in this study is a busy tertiary care center with a chronic shortage of CT technologists. The busy workflow might have contributed to lack of significance for the parameters assessed.

Conclusion: There was a slight but not significant improvement between preintervention and postintervention data.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立创建角度校正、重新格式化脑 CT 图像的标准。
目的:建立计算机断层扫描(CT)脑部检查轴向图像重新格式化的标准化方法:方法:选择眶上缘与枕骨基底之间的解剖线(SOR-BS 线)作为标准化参考线。2022 年 6 月,一家三级医疗中心的 CT 技术人员收到了关于制作标准化 CT 重整图的教育讲座和 1 页参考手册。这就是护理质量干预。随后,对2020年7月1日至10日(干预前)进行的100例脑部CT检查与2022年7月1日至10日(干预后)进行了分析和比较:干预前(6.2 ± 5.8°)和干预后(5.8 ± 4.7°)两组测量的平均角度差异无明显差异(P = .67)。然而,角度差超过 20° 的脑部 CT 研究从 4 项减少到 1 项。此外,未重新格式化图像的脑部 CT 研究从 5 项减少到 2 项:讨论:CT 工作流程中的预期变化未得到最佳采用的原因可能是复杂的、多因素的。然而,本研究中的医疗机构是一家繁忙的三级医疗中心,长期缺乏 CT 技术人员。繁忙的工作流程可能是导致评估参数缺乏显著性的原因之一:干预前和干预后的数据有轻微改善,但不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologic Technology
Radiologic Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Radiologic Technology is an official scholarly journal of the American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Published continuously since 1929, it circulates to more than 145,000 readers worldwide. This award-winning bimonthly Journal covers all disciplines and specialties within medical imaging, including radiography, mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, sonography and cardiovascular-interventional radiography. In addition to peer-reviewed research articles, Radi
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Types, Causes, and Levels of Radiologic Technologist Burnout During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Benchmarking for Success. Beyond Cardiac Output for Vessel Opacification in Computed Tomography. Cardiac CT: Assessing Anatomy, Physiology, And Plaque Formation. Deep Learning Reconstruction in Abdominopelvic Contrast-Enhanced CT for The Evaluation of Hemorrhages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1