Deep Learning Reconstruction in Abdominopelvic Contrast-Enhanced CT for The Evaluation of Hemorrhages.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiologic Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Akira Katayama, Koichiro Yasaka, Hiroshi Hirakawa, Yuta Ohtake, Osamu Abe
{"title":"Deep Learning Reconstruction in Abdominopelvic Contrast-Enhanced CT for The Evaluation of Hemorrhages.","authors":"Akira Katayama, Koichiro Yasaka, Hiroshi Hirakawa, Yuta Ohtake, Osamu Abe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effects of deep learning reconstruction on depicting arteries and providing suitable images for the evaluation of hemorrhages with abdominopelvic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 16 patients (mean age: 54.2 ± 22.1 years; 8 men and 8 women) with acute hemorrhage who underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Unenhanced axial, arterial phase axial, arterial phase coronal, and delayed phase axial images were reconstructed with deep learning reconstruction, hybrid iterative reconstruction, and filtered back projection, which was used as a control in qualitative analyses. Circular and line regions of interest were placed on the aorta and superior mesenteric artery (SMA), respectively, in quantitative analyses. Using a blind process, 2 radiologists independently evaluated image noise, depiction of arteries, and suitability for the evaluation of hemorrhage in qualitative image analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image noise in deep learning reconstruction was significantly reduced compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction in the quantitative (<i>P</i> < .001) and qualitative analyses (Reader 1, <i>P</i> ≤ .001 for all series; Reader 2, <i>P</i> = .002, .001, and < .001). The slope at the half maximum in deep learning reconstruction (123.8 ± 63.2 HU/mm) significantly improved compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (105.3 ± 51.0 HU/mm) in the CT attenuation profile of the SMA (<i>P</i> < .001). Qualitative analyses revealed a significantly improved depiction of arteries (Reader 1, <i>P</i> < .001 for all series; Reader 2, <i>P</i> = .037, .008, and < .001) and suitability for evaluating acute hemorrhage in the arterial phase image (Reader 1, <i>P</i> < .001 for both series; Reader 2, <i>P</i> = .041 and .004) with deep learning reconstruction compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Deep learning reconstruction provided images with a significantly better depiction of arteries and more suitable quality arterial phase images for the evaluation of abdominopelvic hemorrhage compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning reconstruction is better for reconstructing abdominopelvic contrast-enhanced CT images when evaluating hemorrhages; however, a prospective study including a large number of patients is needed to strengthen the findings of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":51772,"journal":{"name":"Radiologic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effects of deep learning reconstruction on depicting arteries and providing suitable images for the evaluation of hemorrhages with abdominopelvic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction.

Methods: This retrospective study included 16 patients (mean age: 54.2 ± 22.1 years; 8 men and 8 women) with acute hemorrhage who underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Unenhanced axial, arterial phase axial, arterial phase coronal, and delayed phase axial images were reconstructed with deep learning reconstruction, hybrid iterative reconstruction, and filtered back projection, which was used as a control in qualitative analyses. Circular and line regions of interest were placed on the aorta and superior mesenteric artery (SMA), respectively, in quantitative analyses. Using a blind process, 2 radiologists independently evaluated image noise, depiction of arteries, and suitability for the evaluation of hemorrhage in qualitative image analyses.

Results: Image noise in deep learning reconstruction was significantly reduced compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction in the quantitative (P < .001) and qualitative analyses (Reader 1, P ≤ .001 for all series; Reader 2, P = .002, .001, and < .001). The slope at the half maximum in deep learning reconstruction (123.8 ± 63.2 HU/mm) significantly improved compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (105.3 ± 51.0 HU/mm) in the CT attenuation profile of the SMA (P < .001). Qualitative analyses revealed a significantly improved depiction of arteries (Reader 1, P < .001 for all series; Reader 2, P = .037, .008, and < .001) and suitability for evaluating acute hemorrhage in the arterial phase image (Reader 1, P < .001 for both series; Reader 2, P = .041 and .004) with deep learning reconstruction compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction.

Discussion: Deep learning reconstruction provided images with a significantly better depiction of arteries and more suitable quality arterial phase images for the evaluation of abdominopelvic hemorrhage compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction.

Conclusion: Deep learning reconstruction is better for reconstructing abdominopelvic contrast-enhanced CT images when evaluating hemorrhages; however, a prospective study including a large number of patients is needed to strengthen the findings of this study.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估出血的腹盆腔对比增强 CT 中的深度学习重建。
目的:与混合迭代重建相比,研究深度学习重建对腹部盆腔对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)描绘动脉和提供适合评估出血图像的效果:这项回顾性研究纳入了 16 名接受造影剂增强 CT 检查的急性出血患者(平均年龄:54.2 ± 22.1 岁;男性 8 人,女性 8 人)。采用深度学习重建、混合迭代重建和滤波背投影重建未增强轴向、动脉相轴向、动脉相冠状和延迟相轴向图像,并将滤波背投影作为定性分析的对照。在定量分析中,主动脉和肠系膜上动脉(SMA)上分别设置了圆形和线形感兴趣区。在图像定性分析中,由两名放射科医生采用盲法独立评估图像噪音、动脉描绘和出血评估的适用性:在定量分析(P < .001)和定性分析中,深度学习重建的图像噪声比混合迭代重建明显降低(读者 1,所有系列的 P ≤ .001;读者 2,P = .002、.001 和 < .001)。与混合迭代重建(105.3 ± 51.0 HU/mm)相比,深度学习重建的半最大值斜率(123.8 ± 63.2 HU/mm)显著改善了SMA的CT衰减曲线(P < .001)。定性分析显示,与混合迭代重建相比,深度学习重建明显改善了动脉的描绘(读者1,所有系列P < .001;读者2,P = .037、.008和< .001),并适合评估动脉期图像中的急性出血(读者1,两个系列P < .001;读者2,P = .041和.004):讨论:与混合迭代重建相比,深度学习重建提供的图像对动脉的描绘明显更好,动脉相位图像质量更适合用于评估腹盆腔出血:结论:在评估出血时,深度学习重建更适合重建腹盆腔造影剂增强 CT 图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologic Technology
Radiologic Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Radiologic Technology is an official scholarly journal of the American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Published continuously since 1929, it circulates to more than 145,000 readers worldwide. This award-winning bimonthly Journal covers all disciplines and specialties within medical imaging, including radiography, mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, sonography and cardiovascular-interventional radiography. In addition to peer-reviewed research articles, Radi
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Types, Causes, and Levels of Radiologic Technologist Burnout During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Benchmarking for Success. Beyond Cardiac Output for Vessel Opacification in Computed Tomography. Cardiac CT: Assessing Anatomy, Physiology, And Plaque Formation. Deep Learning Reconstruction in Abdominopelvic Contrast-Enhanced CT for The Evaluation of Hemorrhages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1