A World Café Approach to Exploring Perspectives on Diabetes Stigma in the United Kingdom

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1111/hex.70023
Amy Elizabeth Burton, Alison Owen, Jennifer Taylor, Sarah Elizabeth Dean, Rachel Povey
{"title":"A World Café Approach to Exploring Perspectives on Diabetes Stigma in the United Kingdom","authors":"Amy Elizabeth Burton,&nbsp;Alison Owen,&nbsp;Jennifer Taylor,&nbsp;Sarah Elizabeth Dean,&nbsp;Rachel Povey","doi":"10.1111/hex.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Research has found that a high percentage of people with diabetes experience stigma, with perceptions of stigma being significantly higher among people with Type 1 diabetes compared to those with Type 2 diabetes. These experiences of diabetes stigma can lead to psychological, behavioural and medical consequences. The aim of the current study was to explore the perceptions of diabetes stigma and propose strategies for addressing this from the perspective of key stakeholders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A mixed methods design was used, commencing with an online qualitative survey (<i>n</i> = 128) and followed by a World Café (<i>n</i> = 11), where attendees reflected on their own experiences with stigma and discussed the survey findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The survey indicated that 75% of those with Type 1 diabetes and 51% with Type 2 had experienced diabetes stigma. The World Café identified three main areas that participants felt impacted their experiences with stigma or had the potential to help improve stigma: healthcare interactions, public awareness and media representations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings supported previous research showing that diabetes stigma is prevalent among people with diabetes. The World Café was an excellent means of sharing knowledge and experiences among stakeholders, the findings of which will inform strategies to bring about change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>World Café is a collaborative method where stakeholders contribute to the production and analysis of data through rounds of discussion and feedback.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Research has found that a high percentage of people with diabetes experience stigma, with perceptions of stigma being significantly higher among people with Type 1 diabetes compared to those with Type 2 diabetes. These experiences of diabetes stigma can lead to psychological, behavioural and medical consequences. The aim of the current study was to explore the perceptions of diabetes stigma and propose strategies for addressing this from the perspective of key stakeholders.

Methods

A mixed methods design was used, commencing with an online qualitative survey (n = 128) and followed by a World Café (n = 11), where attendees reflected on their own experiences with stigma and discussed the survey findings.

Results

The survey indicated that 75% of those with Type 1 diabetes and 51% with Type 2 had experienced diabetes stigma. The World Café identified three main areas that participants felt impacted their experiences with stigma or had the potential to help improve stigma: healthcare interactions, public awareness and media representations.

Conclusions

The findings supported previous research showing that diabetes stigma is prevalent among people with diabetes. The World Café was an excellent means of sharing knowledge and experiences among stakeholders, the findings of which will inform strategies to bring about change.

Patient or Public Contribution

World Café is a collaborative method where stakeholders contribute to the production and analysis of data through rounds of discussion and feedback.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以 "世界咖啡馆"(World Café)的方式探讨英国人对糖尿病耻辱的看法。
导言:研究发现,很大比例的糖尿病患者都有过被鄙视的经历,与 2 型糖尿病患者相比,1 型糖尿病患者被鄙视的程度明显更高。这些糖尿病耻辱感可导致心理、行为和医疗后果。本研究旨在从主要利益相关者的角度,探讨他们对糖尿病耻辱化的看法,并提出应对策略:研究采用混合方法设计,首先进行在线定性调查(128 人),然后举办世界咖啡馆(11 人),与会者在咖啡馆中反思自己的成见经历,并讨论调查结果:调查结果显示,75% 的 1 型糖尿病患者和 51% 的 2 型糖尿病患者都曾遭遇过糖尿病病耻感。世界咖啡馆确定了参与者认为影响他们的成见经历或有可能帮助改善成见的三个主要领域:医疗保健互动、公众意识和媒体表现:结论:研究结果支持了之前的研究,这些研究表明糖尿病耻辱化在糖尿病患者中普遍存在。世界咖啡馆 "是利益相关者分享知识和经验的绝佳方式,其研究结果将为改变现状的战略提供依据:患者或公众的贡献:世界咖啡馆是一种合作方法,利益相关者通过多轮讨论和反馈,为数据的生成和分析做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Patients and Members of the Public Contributing to Rapid Health Technology Assessments for NICE: A Qualitative Study. 'The Letter Says I May or May Not Be Eligible… It Is a Big Doubt and Frustrating:' A Qualitative Study on Barriers and Facilitators to Children's Oral Healthcare From the Perspective of Karen Refugee Parents in Victoria. Beyond the Queue: Exploring Waiting Practices in the Stories of Patients With Breast Cancer Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1